That's not what he asked though. He asked why you thought GD should come before head to head - not if you thought it was a good method.SpaceCruiser wrote:I'm not disagreeing with the concept of head-to-head especially what you said in response to my post - it does make sense, actually. I was just responding to RR to say why I thought GD was a good method.Stranded wrote:It is but are you honestly saying that if we end up on the same points as say Russia having lost away and drawn at home to them, we'd deserve to qualify because we scored more goals against Andorra?SpaceCruiser wrote: The whole point of GD is to encourage attacking play and goals, isn't it?
Actually the reason was made Germany 2006 was down to the form of Lampard, believe he got 6 or 7 goals in the 12 games.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see us getting there without some sort of one man crusade of excellence from Beckham or Owen, who lets face it, are the only reason we made the world cup.
We might get somewhere if McLaren is sacked on thursday, but only by the skin of our teeth.
If we don't win tomorrow we need to sack Mclaren, write off the competition and start over with a fresh persepective. And when I say fresh, I don't mean the head coach under McLaren's tenure. I mean someone currently completely outside the England set up who actually knows their arse from their elbow.
must have been thinking of the previous tournament or making it up. Wow, Frank was actually good in 04-05.Katie Marsden wrote:Actually the reason was made Germany 2006 was down to the form of Lampard, believe he got 6 or 7 goals in the 12 games.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see us getting there without some sort of one man crusade of excellence from Beckham or Owen, who lets face it, are the only reason we made the world cup.
We might get somewhere if McLaren is sacked on thursday, but only by the skin of our teeth.
If we don't win tomorrow we need to sack Mclaren, write off the competition and start over with a fresh persepective. And when I say fresh, I don't mean the head coach under McLaren's tenure. I mean someone currently completely outside the England set up who actually knows their arse from their elbow.
The fresh perspective needs to start at (cliche alert) grass roots level.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see us getting there without some sort of one man crusade of excellence from Beckham or Owen, who lets face it, are the only reason we made the world cup.
We might get somewhere if McLaren is sacked on thursday, but only by the skin of our teeth.
If we don't win tomorrow we need to sack Mclaren, write off the competition and start over with a fresh persepective. And when I say fresh, I don't mean the head coach under McLaren's tenure. I mean someone currently completely outside the England set up who actually knows their arse from their elbow.
Yup, there's games missing.Silver Fox wrote:I'm sure that leaves Russia with 2 more games to play and as one of those is ANdorra I reckon they'll get at least 3 more points
Did it work in the 70s?Royal Rother wrote:I actually kind of hope we don't qualify.
And then kind of hope we don't qualify for the next World Cup.
Such disasters would be the only things likely to shake up the whole coaching system (kids up) sufficiently to bring real progress into our game.
(One disaster won't be enough to shake off the complacency. 2 should just about do it.)
Royal Rother wrote:I actually kind of hope we don't qualify.
And then kind of hope we don't qualify for the next World Cup.
Such disasters would be the only things likely to shake up the whole coaching system (kids up) sufficiently to bring real progress into our game.
(One disaster won't be enough to shake off the complacency. 2 should just about do it.)
With no English manager having won the premiership for how long?vision wrote: It is absolutely no coincidence as far as I'm concerned that the 2 supposedly biggest underacheivers in the European game have the strongest, richest and most powerful domestic leagues.
You're not really a fan, are you?Royal Rother wrote:I actually kind of hope we don't qualify.
And then kind of hope we don't qualify for the next World Cup.
I don't think the England players are actually as good as the English media likes to portray them.there is nothing wrong with the ability of our current crop of players,
They're a pretty good bunch in the main; there are a couple of excellent players and one or two duffers but I think player for player the team compares favourably to most of the teams in Europe. As such England probably have about as much chance as, say, Germany or Spain or Holland of winning the competition - provided they qualify.papereyes wrote:I don't think the England players are actually as good as the English media likes to portray them.there is nothing wrong with the ability of our current crop of players,
They'd like to think that they are, the media and the fans would like to think that they are but given the years of the side not performing to the levels that you might expect from such players, perhaps the truth is that they're good, very good, but not truly great?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 105 guests