Noted.floyd__streete wrote:paulthealltoorepresentativereadingfan wrote:If your upper tier - just dont stand in front of me - seats are for sitting!!
Noted.floyd__streete wrote:paulthealltoorepresentativereadingfan wrote:If your upper tier - just dont stand in front of me - seats are for sitting!!
same 'sit down son' but it wasn't that bad.I liked the way the stewards marched up and down the pitch ordering the spurs fans to sit down.Jerry St Clair wrote:As predicted, there were squeals of "sit down" from behind me less than 20 seconds into the game.
I did notice that virtually none of the Reading fans, even those on the back rows, stood. Perhaps I should just give up and accept that there's no real desire to stand amongst my fellow fans.
And they obliged. Obviously the Spurs fans respect the stewards and viser versa, where as we have a set of c**ts who just get off on being Hitler's.Royalshow wrote:same 'sit down son' but it wasn't that bad.I liked the way the stewards marched up and down the pitch ordering the spurs fans to sit down.Jerry St Clair wrote:As predicted, there were squeals of "sit down" from behind me less than 20 seconds into the game.
I did notice that virtually none of the Reading fans, even those on the back rows, stood. Perhaps I should just give up and accept that there's no real desire to stand amongst my fellow fans.
The tango at the front had a real rapport going with them. They took the piss out of his "Dylan Kerr My Lord"-style motioning, and he responded by carrying on, but in a non-confrontational manner. I think he acceoted that they were going to ignore him, but he'd carry on doing his job anyway.Coppelled Streets wrote: And they obliged. Obviously the Spurs fans respect the stewards and viser versa, where as we have a set of c**ts who just get off on being Hitler's.
I was sat on the back row of the top tier and I was told to sit down by stewards several times. Annoying, given that the home fans behind the goal spent most of the game standing.reading_lad wrote:stood up all game in the upper tier, makes a change, to be fair only because there was those yellow bars behind me, so couldnt block anyones view.
Unless unreserved seating is introduced, Groups of reading fans will rarely stand during games
Me and my mate thought we would have problems with the stewards, but they said nothing. Why they can't just leave the fans at the back causing no trouble alonerabidbee wrote:I was sat on the back row of the top tier and I was told to sit down by stewards several times. Annoying, given that the home fans behind the goal spent most of the game standing.reading_lad wrote:stood up all game in the upper tier, makes a change, to be fair only because there was those yellow bars behind me, so couldnt block anyones view.
Unless unreserved seating is introduced, Groups of reading fans will rarely stand during games
More details pleaseAthleticoSpizz wrote:AF1 needs a seat near the toilets tho'
Big up to the Spurs stewards who sat him in the disabled toilet for 20 minutes of the game
Care in the community rules supreme
After all the posts on this subject - i have to say i dont know what the fuss is all about.Jerry St Clair wrote:As predicted, there were squeals of "sit down" from behind me less than 20 seconds into the game.
I did notice that virtually none of the Reading fans, even those on the back rows, stood. Perhaps I should just give up and accept that there's no real desire to stand amongst my fellow fans.
Not completely true. I think there are quite a few who want to stand, however with people who want to sit having tickets towards the back, it prevents people from standing. Also, can't forget the stewards, who kept getting a group of people at the back of the top tier to sit downpaultheroyal wrote:After all the posts on this subject - i have to say i dont know what the fuss is all about.Jerry St Clair wrote:As predicted, there were squeals of "sit down" from behind me less than 20 seconds into the game.
I did notice that virtually none of the Reading fans, even those on the back rows, stood. Perhaps I should just give up and accept that there's no real desire to stand amongst my fellow fans.
Majority - and i am talking 98% of Reading fans chose to sit down yesterday - when action is exciting or a goal then we stood in our droves...and then everyone returned to their seats naturally. A sprinkle of people remain stood up - but your in a complete minority and this should be just left alone now.
That's exactly why I hate using the online ordering system, it is completely random in terms of where you will be sat.reading_lad wrote:Not completely true. I think there are quite a few who want to stand, however with people who want to sit having tickets towards the back, it prevents people from standing. Also, can't forget the stewards, who kept getting a group of people at the back of the top tier to sit downpaultheroyal wrote:After all the posts on this subject - i have to say i dont know what the fuss is all about.Jerry St Clair wrote:As predicted, there were squeals of "sit down" from behind me less than 20 seconds into the game.
I did notice that virtually none of the Reading fans, even those on the back rows, stood. Perhaps I should just give up and accept that there's no real desire to stand amongst my fellow fans.
Majority - and i am talking 98% of Reading fans chose to sit down yesterday - when action is exciting or a goal then we stood in our droves...and then everyone returned to their seats naturally. A sprinkle of people remain stood up - but your in a complete minority and this should be just left alone now.
Ditto.bobby1413 wrote: I will stand if the person behind me is standing, or the person in front. I would prefer to stand, but will not do it if it means the person behind can't see.
I am happy with that...providing it follows all the way back - no problem.Jerry St Clair wrote:Ditto.bobby1413 wrote: I will stand if the person behind me is standing, or the person in front. I would prefer to stand, but will not do it if it means the person behind can't see.
Hopefully you won't have a ticket behind me for villa thenpaultheroyal wrote:I am happy with that...providing it follows all the way back - no problem.Jerry St Clair wrote:Ditto.bobby1413 wrote: I will stand if the person behind me is standing, or the person in front. I would prefer to stand, but will not do it if it means the person behind can't see.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Tinpot Royal and 33 guests