Enough about Hahnemann.Row Z Royal wrote:Poor goal keeping.
Enough about Hahnemann.Row Z Royal wrote:Poor goal keeping.
Yes. Him in the "Steve Harper" suit.Kes wrote:Enough about Hahnemann.Row Z Royal wrote:Poor goal keeping.
As they do at the last home game of every season, not sure if it was worthy of a mention to be honest.AF1 wrote:The vast majority of Man Utd fans stayed in the ground today to cheer the players round the pitch...
Let it go Spacey, let it go.Thaumagurist* wrote:I watched the end of the Arsenal game before they switched it to the Stoke v Leicester game. Why the f*ck were Arsenal players celebrating? They've won exactly f**k all.
But every single claub can play that game after virtually every single match. If we'd drawn at home with Bolton and Fulham (nbot even betaen them - just not lost to them!) we'd definitely be abovethe virtually-relegated Fulham and only needing a point at Derby to be mathematically safe.cmonurz wrote:On small things are big prizes decided….
Here’s something interesting (well, not very, but it shows how the odd stupid result, or late goal, can have a massive effect on a season). Liverpool will likely finish 11 points behind the league winners this season. But if they had secured home wins over Wigan and Birmingham, and not conceded late equalisers at home to Arsenal and Chelsea, they would be starting the last game of the season with a mathematical chance of winning the title. All ‘what ifs’ of course, but all very feasible too.
I know, and the point Kes has spectacularly missed is that I am saying those things do make a difference, just highlighting how an apparently large gap might look very different had some completely feasible things occurred. The ability of Chelsea to fight and get that draw at Anfield, and Liverpool’s dismal few weeks at home when they couldn’t buy a win - that’s what decides the title.Dirk Gently wrote:But every single claub can play that game after virtually every single match. If we'd drawn at home with Bolton and Fulham (nbot even betaen them - just not lost to them!) we'd definitely be abovethe virtually-relegated Fulham and only needing a point at Derby to be mathematically safe.cmonurz wrote:On small things are big prizes decided….
Here’s something interesting (well, not very, but it shows how the odd stupid result, or late goal, can have a massive effect on a season). Liverpool will likely finish 11 points behind the league winners this season. But if they had secured home wins over Wigan and Birmingham, and not conceded late equalisers at home to Arsenal and Chelsea, they would be starting the last game of the season with a mathematical chance of winning the title. All ‘what ifs’ of course, but all very feasible too.
And if Shane Long hadn't been a prat at Birmingham the same would apply - just a draw needed.
Chelsea would have been down to 10 men and Liverpool would have been awarded a pen.Kes wrote: its like me saying, what if that goal that never was in the CL semi final in 2005 between Liverpool and Chelsea wasn't given.
Thaumagurist* wrote:I watched the end of the Arsenal game before they switched it to the Stoke v Leicester game. Why the f*ck were Arsenal players celebrating? They've won exactly f**k all.
It's not rubbish, simply point out, as you have re Heskey's goal, how a 9-month, 38-game season is actually determined by a few coin-flips, which is what makes it so enthralling. Calm down Harold, I wasn't insulting Chelsea.Kes wrote:The point you are making is rubbish though.
its like me saying, what if that goal that never was in the CL semi final in 2005 between Liverpool and Chelsea wasn't given. Rafa would be out of a job by now.
What if Hesky hadn't scored in injury time against Chelsea a few weeks back.
All ifs and buts.
just chillax down to a panic m8Kes wrote:i think you've interpreted that I was annoyed.

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 105 guests