No.southstand67 wrote:Random question Slammed - and I don't want you to read anything into this; are you a steward?SLAMMED wrote:At the end of the day, they are there for our safety.
Thugs? What are you on? The stewarding at the Mad tad is pretty light touch for most sections of the ground, and even in the se corner it's not really full on. If the police objected to individuals standing, using offensive language, &c., it'd certainly be a lot worse.ankeny wrote:Im old school so I would rather see policemen standing around the ground then a lot of minimum wage legalised wannabe thugs telling us what to do.
Quite - it was a pair of coppers that told somebody near me to sit down early in the match yesterday, although they may also have been reacting to language being used.Dirk Gently wrote: That's all a technicality, of course - in reality it's not like that at many grounds.
Yes, absolutely, but if they're trying to enforce ground regulations where there's no disorder, swearing etc and no stewards are involved, they're technically out of order.rabidbee wrote:Quite - it was a pair of coppers that told somebody near me to sit down early in the match yesterday, although they may also have been reacting to language being used.Dirk Gently wrote: That's all a technicality, of course - in reality it's not like that at many grounds.
Wouldn't disorderly conduct be a broad enough offence to justify a police intervening in any situation anyway?

Yes, what the hell was that all about? Thousands of people all trying to leave the East Stand at once and the only way out is along a relatively narrow stretch of pavement because the numpties have still got the big gates shut!!jonboy29red wrote:there clueless had a argument with one today over the gate they use at half time for the smokers at the end of the game still closed causing a crush situation opened it and got told what was i doing!!!
all you will get its the same standered message back that your comments have been passed on to mr doyle and that he will look in to it i did report it to some one on the way out he said he would report it i dunno if he did or notThe 17 Bus wrote:Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
jonboy29red wrote:all you will get its the same standered message back that your comments have been passed on to mr doyle and that he will look in to it i did report it to some one on the way out he said he would report it i dunno if he did or notThe 17 Bus wrote:Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
Yh its Jeffmadreadingfan wrote:jeff i thinkThe 17 Bus wrote:Who is the Tango with the beard??
Seems to be right in the thick of all the problems, eyeballing fans all the time.
What's he got to do with it?jonboy29red wrote:your comments have been passed on to mr doyleThe 17 Bus wrote:Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
SCIAG wrote:jonboy29red wrote:your comments have been passed on to mr doyleThe 17 Bus wrote:Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
What's he got to do with it?
Anyone else see the problem he seems to have?whos pulled me out three times for standing, even though i sit
That's what it should be like - common-sense, flexible stewarding, with stewards having the authority to use their discretion to defuse situations (and having the intelligence to do so as well).RoyalBlue wrote:Whilst on the subject of stewards, top marks to the yellow coat who exercised common sense and discretion in allowing my kids to hand their flag over the wall last night. In the past some of the more jobs worths have immediately made them take it down. This guy realised that whilst it was slightly overlapping the top corner of the sponsors sign, it was in now way obsuring their name or anything else and allowed it to stay, despite the fact it was a televised match.
This was a situation of give on both sides, I think the steward saw me telling the kids to make sure that the flag covered as little of the board as possible, and shows that there are some good stewards at the Mad Stad. I think it also shows the value of trying to use the same stewards in the same areas of the stadium as much as possible so that they and the supporters get to know what each other is like.
Some Parking Attendants appear to regard it as a perk of the job!Dirk Gently wrote:That's what it should be like - common-sense, flexible stewarding, with stewards having the authority to use their discretion to defuse situations (and having the intelligence to do so as well).RoyalBlue wrote:Whilst on the subject of stewards, top marks to the yellow coat who exercised common sense and discretion in allowing my kids to hand their flag over the wall last night. In the past some of the more jobs worths have immediately made them take it down. This guy realised that whilst it was slightly overlapping the top corner of the sponsors sign, it was in now way obsuring their name or anything else and allowed it to stay, despite the fact it was a televised match.
This was a situation of give on both sides, I think the steward saw me telling the kids to make sure that the flag covered as little of the board as possible, and shows that there are some good stewards at the Mad Stad. I think it also shows the value of trying to use the same stewards in the same areas of the stadium as much as possible so that they and the supporters get to know what each other is like.
Agree also that continuity of stewards is a good thing - the problem is that when, every week, they are on the receiving end of the people who go to the game with a "them and us" attitude, many don't stay doing the job. Would you if you got abused every week for doing your job?
Actually no standing is the F.A's regulations which the stewards are there to enforce, some of the stewards are alright but what gets up my nose is the fact that myself and many others that sit in y26 are constantly being told to sit down and yesterday random people were being thrown out "to set an example" apparently BUT looking at the away end of the stadium there were a group of fans standing throughout the whole game even though there were stewards stood behind them and other tango's at the tunnel leading into the concourse.Dirk Gently wrote:Don't forget that the Police don't have jurisdiction over standing.
Standing is the ground regulations, which the stewards are there to enforce. The Police can only get involved to assist a steward after someone has been offensive to a steward or others or has refused to obey a steward's orders.
That's all a technicality, of course - in reality it's not like that at many grounds.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Orion1871, Royality creeps In and 70 guests