That seems to be suggesting that those two are the two easy games. Whilst that is certainly true with Andorra, I'm not so sure about Belarus. They're one of the up and coming nations. They beat Kazakhstan 5-1 away (similar to England), their U21s qualified for the finals, etc. Saying all that England should beat them on paper, but seeing how hard Ukraine made it for them I doubt it will be easy as Belarus are at a similar level to Ukraine these days.LUX wrote:I've just worked out that if we win at home to Andorra and Belarus, we cannot be caught, allowing us to lose in Ukraine and at home to Croatia.
(I do realise that the matches are not in that order, my point is that those two victories are definitely enough.)
When you've played 6 and won 6 the other results are pretty irrelevant.LUX wrote:Croatia 2 Ukraine 2.
Best result for us, I think?
I never understand why people say things like this, yes I know he's a Reading player but I have no ties with him, should he sign for another club I wouldn't watch him play international football. Whereas I will always watch and support England no matter how poorly we play - I'm English so they always come first.winchester_royal wrote:Watching Simon Church play for Wales >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Watching England.

ITVrabidbee wrote:Is this one going to be on the telly?
cmonurz wrote:Same team as Saturday, but Huddlestone for Barry.
Because it's Andorra at home, Huddlestone is a promising young defensive midfielder, and we are without a defensive midfielder.TBM wrote:cmonurz wrote:Same team as Saturday, but Huddlestone for Barry.- why Huddlesstone?
Personally i would put Beckham in and move Gerrard into the middle
'greed, well that or give me a gameTBM wrote:cmonurz wrote:Same team as Saturday, but Huddlestone for Barry.- why Huddlesstone?
Personally i would put Beckham in and move Gerrard into the middle
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests