It certainly shows that the 106 / 8th place team were greater than the sum of their parts.Einstein agogo wrote:i laugh at the " i'm too good for reading " mentality of these players who have all gone nowhere in the prem
The 106 team were a management miracle. And partly just a miracle.Z175 wrote: It certainly shows that the 106 / 8th place team were greater than the sum of their parts.
Which is why it was totally inept boardroom management to increase the wages paid to this team from £12,000,000 to over £30,000,000 in wages over this period.
Sidwell and Doyle are exceptions. Apart from that, every time one of the 106 team sinks back to their natural level, it only increases the standing of the man who gelled them all together.Z175 wrote:It certainly shows that the 106 / 8th place team were greater than the sum of their parts.Einstein agogo wrote:i laugh at the " i'm too good for reading " mentality of these players who have all gone nowhere in the prem
Which is why it was totally inept boardroom management to increase the wages paid to this team from £12,000,000 to over £30,000,000 in wages over this period.
Sidwell on loan to Palace next?
Z175 wrote:It certainly shows that the 106 / 8th place team were greater than the sum of their parts.Einstein agogo wrote:i laugh at the " i'm too good for reading " mentality of these players who have all gone nowhere in the prem
Which is why it was totally inept boardroom management to increase the wages paid to this team from £12,000,000 to over £30,000,000 in wages over this period.
Sidwell on loan to Palace next?
Thaumagurist* wrote:WTF has this got to do with us? Why another thread on this?
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=94505
Apart from in the eyes of Royalee .....CMRoyal wrote: Sidwell and Doyle are exceptions. Apart from that, every time one of the 106 team sinks back to their natural level, it only increases the standing of the man who gelled them all together.
They used to play for the Team. Remember?Thaumagurist* wrote:WTF has this got to do with us? Why another thread on this?
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=94505
It's quite misleading, isn't it. Made me think he'd signed for us.Focher wrote:Thaumagurist* wrote:WTF has this got to do with us? Why another thread on this?
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=94505no sleep for Spacey tonight
Take your common sense and piss off. Not welcome on HNA?brendywendy wrote:Z175 wrote:It certainly shows that the 106 / 8th place team were greater than the sum of their parts.Einstein agogo wrote:i laugh at the " i'm too good for reading " mentality of these players who have all gone nowhere in the prem
Which is why it was totally inept boardroom management to increase the wages paid to this team from £12,000,000 to over £30,000,000 in wages over this period.
Sidwell on loan to Palace next?
laughable to suggest that doubling their wages upon promotion to the prem- when we more than doubled our income, was inept.its market forces.
in fact what has happened since just confirms- if we had not doubled their wages-all of those players would have gone to other teams, and we would have been left with a rebuilding job in our very first year in the top flight-probably reducing our stay there by one year, and definitely reducing our 8th place finish to a lower bottom half one.
i suggest not rewarding those players, not keeping them happy here- that would have been the inept thing to do.
Thaumagurist* wrote:WTF has this got to do with us? Why another thread on this?
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=94505
Well, change the thread title then.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Read the thread, its developed along the lines of the value of the 106 team and not about Shorey specifically.
loyalty to players who have proven for two season that they produce and deserve that loyalty isnt misplaced imo.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Thaumagurist* wrote:WTF has this got to do with us? Why another thread on this?
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=94505
Increasing the salary may have been a bit dim, but really it worked well the first season in the Premiership and then was screwed by
a) SC failing to replace Little and Sidwell
b) Performances from some of th eplayers who seemed to think they were proven and could cruise it
c) SC showing too much loyalty to those players
F**k me, you are boring. How many years have you peddling the same sh*t ? Get a life, you loser.Thaumagurist* wrote:Well, change the thread title then.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Read the thread, its developed along the lines of the value of the 106 team and not about Shorey specifically.
you are not a modThaumagurist* wrote:Well, change the thread title then.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Read the thread, its developed along the lines of the value of the 106 team and not about Shorey specifically.
Re: a) - I think I'm right in saying that it wasn't for the want of trying. Simple fact is, players in and around the bottom end of the Prem/top end of the Championship didn't want to come to us so we had to look abroad.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Thaumagurist* wrote:WTF has this got to do with us? Why another thread on this?
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopi ... =3&t=94505Read the thread, its developed along the lines of the value of the 106 team and not about Shorey specifically.
Increasing the salary may have been a bit dim, but really it worked well the first season in the Premiership and then was screwed by
a) SC failing to replace Little and Sidwell
b) Performances from some of th eplayers who seemed to think they were proven and could cruise it
c) SC showing too much loyalty to those players
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests