Agreed. USA have been less than convincing with two somewhat lucky draws and a slightly lucky win. Ghana have actually looked a very good side in a genuinely difficult group. Lack a little in the goals, but well worth their win.Baines wrote:And why would it be incredible if Ghana pull this off? They've played well in all their games so far and put in an excellent performance in 2006, only getting knocked out by Brazil.
i would say only because of the history books. i think only three african nations have now reached the last 16 of a world cup. credit to them, as you say they have played some good football and look very strong. delighted for them, even if one half of my family are head in hands about the result. america can be proud of the team, the national team continue to develop and there's a lot to be positive about going forwards. where as if we lose tomorrow, all we'll here about is failure, disgrace and the end of the golden age (no more world cups for heskey, beckham, terry, ferdinand, a.cole, j.cole, barry, gerrard, lampard..)Baines wrote:And why would it be incredible if Ghana pull this off? They've played well in all their games so far and put in an excellent performance in 2006, only getting knocked out by Brazil.
Because in the 3 group games they never looked like scoring? They look OK in patches but are nothing special at all.Baines wrote:And why would it be incredible if Ghana pull this off? They've played well in all their games so far and put in an excellent performance in 2006, only getting knocked out by Brazil.
Tony Le Mesmer wrote:Because in the 3 group games they never looked like scoring? They look OK in patches but are nothing special at all.Baines wrote:And why would it be incredible if Ghana pull this off? They've played well in all their games so far and put in an excellent performance in 2006, only getting knocked out by Brazil.
Jay - it's happened five times with four countriesJay wrote:i would say only because of the history books. i think only three african nations have now reached the last 16 of a world cup. credit to them, as you say they have played some good football and look very strong. delighted for them, even if one half of my family are head in hands about the result. america can be proud of the team, the national team continue to develop and there's a lot to be positive about going forwards. where as if we lose tomorrow, all we'll here about is failure, disgrace and the end of the golden age (no more world cups for heskey, beckham, terry, ferdinand, a.cole, j.cole, barry, gerrard, lampard..)Baines wrote:And why would it be incredible if Ghana pull this off? They've played well in all their games so far and put in an excellent performance in 2006, only getting knocked out by Brazil.
If you were to see my text commentary posted elsewhere during and after the Algeria game, you'll conclude in short order that in my estim7ion, you've gone well soft on the ladArch wrote:Donovan, Dempsey, and Bradley all definitely belong on this stage, but for me Altidore is ouank
Agree in general but the Yanks are never going to make a major final.Ian Royal wrote:Altidore is a good athlete. But he ain't a footballer. Really missing a quality striker like McBride these days.
The defence and midfield is solid with the odd gem as already mentioned. Just not quite enough. Great mentality. If the yanks can find a top striker and not have to rely on the likes of DeMerit as a defender then they'd have the goods to potentially get to a final.
Ghana for me just allow themselves to drop deep and leave Gyan totally isolated too easily. He's a great player but not really seeming like he'll get many goals (penalties excluded). That means the likes of Ayew, Boateng and Asamoah need to chip in.
Uruguay - Ghana should be a good game. Both teams seem to me to like to play good passing football, but can play over the top as well. I suspect the Uruguayan defence will prove too strong. Not that I feel it's been tested by a particularly good attack yet.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests