Last time we were there the wage bill was just under £10m, so double would be almost £20m, £11m from parachute and £10m from sales, tho of course that would not all have been recieved at the time of the sale, tho we would be receiving cash from other sales in the past, if we are to believe it does not all come up front, how you must all love financesWycombe Royal wrote: I would hazard a guess that the money from the sales of Kitson, Shorey, Sonko disaapeared into our income that helped pay the huge wage bill we had last season, and hence why we had to offload those high earners this summer.
There's a pretty chunky 3 story addition to the ground on the South West side - wrongly called a media suite but actually it houses most of the people who run the club and other things. Before it was built people were housed all over the place, some in what was no more than a broom cupboard. 100% necessary ? Possibly not, but it must make the place more efficient.Victor Meldrew wrote:Looking at the numbers again.
Players 42
Football Management & coaching staff 57
Admin staff 96
Isn't it all a bit top heavy on the non-playing staff?
Presumably with all the cost cutting of recent times we will one day see much reduced numbers in all areas?
I would still like to see an explanation of those massive "infrastrucure" costs at nearly £7.5 million when the tangle assets come to less than £60million.
Has anybody seen the extension to the ground or any other massive changes around the ground?
Sun Tzu wrote:There's a pretty chunky 3 story addition to the ground on the South West side - wrongly called a media suite but actually it houses most of the people who run the club and other things. Before it was built people were housed all over the place, some in what was no more than a broom cupboard. 100% necessary ? Possibly not, but it must make the place more efficient.Victor Meldrew wrote:Looking at the numbers again.
Players 42
Football Management & coaching staff 57
Admin staff 96
Isn't it all a bit top heavy on the non-playing staff?
Presumably with all the cost cutting of recent times we will one day see much reduced numbers in all areas?
I would still like to see an explanation of those massive "infrastrucure" costs at nearly £7.5 million when the tangle assets come to less than £60million.
Has anybody seen the extension to the ground or any other massive changes around the ground?
Good to hear there is some visible evidence of infrastrucure expenditure.
BTW just heard from a source that in the past has come up with accurate stuff that the sale of the club is not far off and we are talking of Asian owners and not Arabs.
Interesting to see whether they will spend money on the playing side now that the infrastructure is well up to speed.
It still sounds like a hell of a lot of coaches and admin staff to me.
Hogwood has also had a lot of work on it. Again probably not strictly necessary but the story has always been that becasue we don't play top wages we try and make sure the players are offered the best facilities.
The numbers for coaches etc would almost certainly include all the coaches down through the age groups so the comparison of player to coaches is a bit false. If you assume we run a dozen teams all told then 3 coaches per team (which woul dbe under at the top level and over at the lower end) is maybe not so excessive.
I'm pretty sure the wage bill for last season would have been higher than £20m.Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:Last time we were there the wage bill was just under £10m, so double would be almost £20m, £11m from parachute and £10m from sales, tho of course that would not all have been recieved at the time of the sale, tho we would be receiving cash from other sales in the past, if we are to believe it does not all come up front, how you must all love financesWycombe Royal wrote: I would hazard a guess that the money from the sales of Kitson, Shorey, Sonko disaapeared into our income that helped pay the huge wage bill we had last season, and hence why we had to offload those high earners this summer.![]()
Because the accounts for the year ending 30/6/09 haven't been produced yet.Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:Well why not release the figure
^^ What he saidIan Royal wrote:Why should they bother. Give all the minute details and they get accused of trying to hide things in details and make it impossible to understand. Release a summary and keep it simple and they're trying to hide something by not giving us all the information.
Some people have made their minds up regardless what the club say. You can't accuse the club of not being open now though. What other club would have done this?
Won't he have to if it is a limited company?Uke wrote:^^ What he saidIan Royal wrote:Why should they bother. Give all the minute details and they get accused of trying to hide things in details and make it impossible to understand. Release a summary and keep it simple and they're trying to hide something by not giving us all the information.
Some people have made their minds up regardless what the club say. You can't accuse the club of not being open now though. What other club would have done this?
I'm sure Pompey's new owner will be regularly publishing this information in future
Doubt it.Victor Meldrew wrote:Won't he have to if it is a limited company?Uke wrote:^^ What he saidIan Royal wrote:Why should they bother. Give all the minute details and they get accused of trying to hide things in details and make it impossible to understand. Release a summary and keep it simple and they're trying to hide something by not giving us all the information.
Some people have made their minds up regardless what the club say. You can't accuse the club of not being open now though. What other club would have done this?
I'm sure Pompey's new owner will be regularly publishing this information in future
Yes, the people who published them doVictor Meldrew wrote:Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
Not if it's a dodgy airline or one from certain Eastern European or African countries!!Uke wrote:Yes, the people who published them doVictor Meldrew wrote:Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
I think my analogy still fits because in reality if you want to fly from Donetsk to Ulan Bator you haven't got a choice so it really doesn't matterRoyalBlue wrote:Not if it's a dodgy airline or one from certain Eastern European or African countries!!Uke wrote:Yes, the people who published them doVictor Meldrew wrote:Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
Also, of particular relevance is the fact that various safety groups are now beginning to express concern over the way in which standards may be compromised because even previously well respected airlines are over-desperate to cut costs.
I'm assuming Vic was responding to the Pompey reference - and as Pompey haven;t published anything that I've seen...Uke wrote:Yes, the people who published them doVictor Meldrew wrote:Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
You are right it was a reference to Pompey.Sun Tzu wrote:I'm assuming Vic was responding to the Pompey reference - and as Pompey haven;t published anything that I've seen...Uke wrote:Yes, the people who published them doVictor Meldrew wrote:Does ANYBODY know how it is structured?
You don't need to know
When you fly in a plane do you demand to know where each part hasbeen sourced? And see the training records for all the mechanics who serviced the plane?
Or are you happy enough to take the word of the Airline that it's in good enough nick to fly?
Agree with the general thrust though - I have no more need to understand th enuts an dbolt of RFC's finances than I do those of Tesco or BP. I'm a consumer, I pay my money in return for watching a game of football. If the club use some of the income they generate to do some building work, pay over the odds for a deputy second assistant groundsman etc etc then more fool them but am I especially bothered ?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 58 guests