
Pete Burns has toned down the makeup as he's got older then.That Friday Feeling wrote:Any excuse...
Me neither TBH.Deadlock wrote:Is that just a bad photo, or is she really that plain? Can't see the attraction myself.
We signed stack before he was cleared...facaldaqui wrote:This is why I disagree with the advice to do things the Stoke way in the premier; I don't want us signing the Woodgate and Pennant types of human being.soggy biscuit wrote:Jermain Pennant arrested and charged with drink driving, driving while disqualified and driving with no insurance after crashing into another car.
Without football clubs mollycoddling their assets like him these people would be screwed. I predict Pennant will be dead within 5 years of retiring.
We had him on the book while waiting for trial. For me it was a mistake to touch him with a lucky stick.Hoop Blah wrote:No we didn't.
We signed him on loan and then completed it when he was acquitted. If he hadn't of got off we wouldn't have signed him.
Innocent until proven guilty..........?working class hero wrote:We had him on the book while waiting for trial. For me it was a mistake to touch him with a lucky stick.Hoop Blah wrote:No we didn't.
We signed him on loan and then completed it when he was acquitted. If he hadn't of got off we wouldn't have signed him.
So as you say we signed him on loan because we weren't sure of an innocent verdict. It was an error... but hopefully a one off.
Mmmmm.... that is certainly the principle. But you wouldn't apply it to a suspected paedophile teacher would you? And if we were confident we would have signed him up before trial.cmonurz wrote:Innocent until proven guilty..........?working class hero wrote:We had him on the book while waiting for trial. For me it was a mistake to touch him with a lucky stick.Hoop Blah wrote:No we didn't.
We signed him on loan and then completed it when he was acquitted. If he hadn't of got off we wouldn't have signed him.
So as you say we signed him on loan because we weren't sure of an innocent verdict. It was an error... but hopefully a one off.
If it gets you to the nearest burger van then to the shop for cigs without being caught then yes, it is worth it.FiNeRaIn wrote:Why do people do it? Is it really worth it?
Aha, that's what having already been disqualified from driving meant, thanks for clearing that up.Simon's Church wrote:Second time he's done it as well...
Hoop Blah wrote:Aha, that's what having already been disqualified from driving meant, thanks for clearing that up.Simon's Church wrote:Second time he's done it as well...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests