by From Despair To Where? » 16 Feb 2017 21:15
16 Feb 2017 21:15
Sanguine wrote:Not football but had me chuckling. Venezuelan skier who had only trained on wheeled skis races on snow for the first time, at the world cross-country championships.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/ ... -the-eagle





Here is the review of the Fred Spiksley book from When Saturday Comes - anyone in London on evening of 19 May can come along to Southwark brewing Company and find out more about Fred. The images we've got are oldest in world from a Cup Final and International goalsWinston Smith wrote:Bloke on Talksport yesterday discussing a book he has written on Fred Spiksley. Spiksley was the most famous player in the country in the late 1800's/early 1900's, scored a hat-trick on his England debut against Wales, then another hat-trick on his 2nd appearance against Scotland, was considered to be the best player in the country by some distance and became a big celeb. ended up being mates with Charlie Chaplin and would appear on stage with him at his shows. Went on to travel the world as a football coach, was coaching in Germany when war broke out and was arrested there and subsequently escaped. Was also a big drinker, gambler, went bankrupt, and was always at the races. died at Goodwood races on Ladies Day.
sounds like a proper #lad and is one of them 'how is this not more well known?' kind of stories,
I might (probably) have this wrong, but I thought in a shoot-out that as soon as the ball was 'off-target', it was dead, specifically that this goal shouldn't stand. In the same way for example, I thought if the shot hits the post and cannons back in off the keeper, again it was no goal.
by 10539.4 Miles Away » 25 Oct 2017 06:13
25 Oct 2017 06:13I think it stands as neither the taker or keeper touched it after it smashed the cross bar, the spin took it back in, just the same as it clattering the post and then going in (without hitting the keeper) would stand.Sanguine wrote:I might (probably) have this wrong, but I thought in a shoot-out that as soon as the ball was 'off-target', it was dead, specifically that this goal shouldn't stand. In the same way for example, I thought if the shot hits the post and cannons back in off the keeper, again it was no goal.
The official rule is the ref decides when the penalty is "dead" so it does count10539.4 Miles Away wrote:I think it stands as neither the taker or keeper touched it after it smashed the cross bar, the spin took it back in, just the same as it clattering the post and then going in (without hitting the keeper) would stand.Sanguine wrote:I might (probably) have this wrong, but I thought in a shoot-out that as soon as the ball was 'off-target', it was dead, specifically that this goal shouldn't stand. In the same way for example, I thought if the shot hits the post and cannons back in off the keeper, again it was no goal.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 6 guests