As alluded to above, his Icelandic club would have got a solidarity payment (presumably as well as a sell on) when we sold him to Hoffenheim, and then another solidarity payment when he was sold from Hoffenheim to Spurs. Because International transfers of a professional player.West Stand Man wrote:KC Royal wrote:I've always wondered whether we had a sell-on for Gylfi even though there's been no evidence to suggest we have (unlike Antonio who i'm convinced we got money for after his moves to Forest and West Ham).genome wrote:
Probably calculating this wrong but my workings are showing we should've got £1,125,000 from the Gylfi sale to Everton
Gylfi's Icelandic club certainly had a sell-on though, 10% IIRC, so they've done particularly well out of the Everton deal.
Really? I don't think I have ever heard of a sell on clause that goes on for ever. In fact I suspect that it wouldn't (couldn't) be contractually binding to impose a sell on fee to a future sale. Maybe one of our resident lawyers might be able to comment?
It would just get silly, where every club was adding its own % sell on clause through the career of a player. You'd eventually end up with the actual selling club getting nothing! Or, even worse, that the selling club owed more than the transfer fee to all the previous clubs!
(By future sale I mean ones like Gyllfi to Everton, which is beyond our agreement with Hoffenheim.)
ayjaydee wrote:Aluko was the guest pundit on the Championship at the weekend. Came across as very knowledgeable about the Championship and players and was, imho, both erudite and personable. Was also very up front about whether he would celebrate if he scores against his former club(s) - hell yes!
In the words of Tim Nice But Dim " a bloody nice bloke" .
Yes. His comments found a target which more than his shots ever do.loyalroyal4life wrote:ayjaydee wrote:Aluko was the guest pundit on the Championship at the weekend. Came across as very knowledgeable about the Championship and players and was, imho, both erudite and personable. Was also very up front about whether he would celebrate if he scores against his former club(s) - hell yes!
In the words of Tim Nice But Dim " a bloody nice bloke" .
Better pundit than footballer?
According to TTE the Fulham CEO at their AGM last night said "Reading’s opening offer for Sone Aluko was £1m. Eventually rose to £7m. We didn’t want to sell but that offer was too good to turn down.”The Reverend wrote:Fulham have apparently bid £7.5M for Brentford's Jota
£7.5M for Aluko is BONKERS.
Fair fooks to Wiz for calling this oneWizard wrote:Isn't he actually dreadful? What a waste of money.
i THINK HE Will aswellCoppells Lost Coat wrote:I'm still holding out that he'll come good. Probs more fool me than anything.
I am hoping he will be exchanged for some magic beans this summer.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:I'm still holding out that he'll come good. Probs more fool me than anything.
not even fussed about the magic part to be honestOld Man Andrews wrote:I am hoping he will be exchanged for some magic beans this summer.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:I'm still holding out that he'll come good. Probs more fool me than anything.
Hound wrote:not even fussed about the magic part to be honestOld Man Andrews wrote:I am hoping he will be exchanged for some magic beans this summer.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:I'm still holding out that he'll come good. Probs more fool me than anything.
Hammond would have told them to take a hike somewhere around £2.5m. Going from £1m to £7m stinks of desperate cluelessness. And for Aluko FFS.Zip wrote:If true then can we trust Tevreden going forward? Shocking value for money
I reck there's loads of add-ons that bring it up to that price, but not up front stuff. Remember that the Fulham guy is going to want himself to look good too, it's not like he's a disinterested observer.Zip wrote:If true then can we trust Tevreden going forward? Shocking value for money
This.muirinho wrote:I reck there's loads of add-ons that bring it up to that price, but not up front stuff. Remember that the Fulham guy is going to want himself to look good too, it's not like he's a disinterested observer.Zip wrote:If true then can we trust Tevreden going forward? Shocking value for money
Probably 3-4 mill, with rest based on performance and promotion. So both of them could be telling the truth - as they see it.
In terms of value for money though, yes, whichever figure it is, he's been poor.
Yeah, I'd be surprised if we wrote a check for the full 7.5 mil and handed it over early doors. I agree, around 3mil up front is probably more accurate.muirinho wrote:I reck there's loads of add-ons that bring it up to that price, but not up front stuff. Remember that the Fulham guy is going to want himself to look good too, it's not like he's a disinterested observer.Zip wrote:If true then can we trust Tevreden going forward? Shocking value for money
Probably 3-4 mill, with rest based on performance and promotion. So both of them could be telling the truth - as they see it.
In terms of value for money though, yes, whichever figure it is, he's been poor.
tbf, Hammond's dined out on 'half a million for Andy Hughes' for yearsDenver Royal wrote: By the way, I thought it was poor of the Fulham 'exececutive' to come out with that in public. As in, 'Look at me, look what we fleeced them for, haha!'.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Sutekh and 455 guests