Yeah, complete backwards step.genome wrote:Spurs have gone from Tim Sherwood to Jose Mourinho in five years.
That's pretty impressive to be fair.
Yeah, complete backwards step.genome wrote:Spurs have gone from Tim Sherwood to Jose Mourinho in five years.
That's pretty impressive to be fair.
Why would say you this when he hasn't done so in the recent jobs he's had?paultheroyal wrote:He will learn lessons from the past.
Don't be so sure.....genome wrote:In the gilet department?

What is the "Spurs identity"? Complete and utter failure? If so then you're right, he doesn't fit that.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Spurs have always been my second team (family connections as a kid), but that is now officially binned off
I detest Mourinho with a passion and he just doesn't fit with the spurs identity for me.
So fukk Spurs bascially
there are fans at every club who make refernce to 'the (insert club name) way'. It's completely meaningless in 99% of cases. Makes certain people feel like their club has more of an identity (and one to be envied) than it really does, and by extension makes them feel good about themselves.Old Man Andrews wrote:What is the "Spurs identity"? Complete and utter failure? If so then you're right, he doesn't fit that.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Spurs have always been my second team (family connections as a kid), but that is now officially binned off
I detest Mourinho with a passion and he just doesn't fit with the spurs identity for me.
So fukk Spurs bascially
The only thing I'd say is he could instil a winning mentality into the club in the longer term. The pressure on Spurs' to win trophies is building each year (especially with the same crop of players) and with Mourinho, it's probably likely to happen more than under PochettinoFrom Despair To Where? wrote:I don't think anyone's saying he's a bad manager, just that he has a collosal ego who thrives on creating tension and instability. It's not a blueprint for long term success. He's a deluxe Martin Allen. Comes in, shakes things up but eventually pisses everybody off. If it's a short, sharp shock you're looking for then fine.
Actually in a round about way, I kind of am saying he's a bad manager.
John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Its a massive generalisation obvs but whether you like them or not, imo Spurs have always like their football to have flair. And the stability and identity of the club has always trumped having pcunts for managers
read it againURZZZZ wrote:You said identity had “always” triumphed for Spurs. Clearly it hasn’t
I’m blind...stealthpapes wrote:read it againURZZZZ wrote:You said identity had “always” triumphed for Spurs. Clearly it hasn’t
trumped
Fans want to see trophies don’t they?Hoop Blah wrote:I don't think you can really dispute the fact that Spurs are known for trying to play some form of attractive, attacking football with more than an element of flair to it.
It doesn't always bring success of course, well, hardly ever, but it is what the fans like to see and has been since the Bill Nicholson days hasn't it?
I'd say they were playing decent football more recently than that, but that's kind of irrelevant to either their identity or desired style. You could even use that to support the case for it as it'll be one of the reasons why they've ended up sacking him.URZZZZ wrote:Fans want to see trophies don’t they?Hoop Blah wrote:I don't think you can really dispute the fact that Spurs are known for trying to play some form of attractive, attacking football with more than an element of flair to it.
It doesn't always bring success of course, well, hardly ever, but it is what the fans like to see and has been since the Bill Nicholson days hasn't it?
Spurs did play decent football up until a couple of years ago when they had Dembele and an inform Wanyama as the two holding midfielders. Ever since Wanyama has gone out of form and something happened to Dembele, there’s been no link between the defence and attack so they’ve just ended up passing around the back four. Apart from a decent run November - February time last season, they haven’t really looked convincing for a while
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Sutekh and 7 guests