I'd pay 1 million a year to keep him away..Hound wrote:Losing Gourlay is an extra £1m a year...
We also haven’t replaced our Technical Director yet.Hound wrote:Losing Gourlay is an extra £1m a year...
How much do academy lads earn? Mafff had a very long list (33) of players that could/should go - some of them academy. Anybody care to have a go at pricing wages for this lot?NewCorkSeth wrote:Cheers for calculating that! I hoped we would be closer and someone could say my estimates on salary were a little generous..Snowflake Royal wrote:Income is about £18m. Wages are about £30m.NewCorkSeth wrote:So if McShane, O'Shea, Jaakkola, Popa, JvdB, Gravenberch and Harriott all leave on a free that's gotta be 60-70k in wages freed up right?
Add into that selling Kelly and Meyler and maybe another 25-30k in wages freed up? Would that really not be enough to turn the financial tide?
Obviously there are other player we could see gone to balance the books and then theres the question of Swift and Moore being possible transfer targets but imagining them staying surely there would be enough left wages wise to sign a couple?
£70k + £30k is £100k a week or £5.2m a year. So only about halfway there.
Potentially there is some bonuses in their too for these players?
Looks like shifting Gunter and McCleary is more important than i thought. Both must be on or around 20k a week.
The club is bound to have a salary cap for academy players. I imagine most are on less than 1k a week. Losing them wont change too much as other academy players will just turn 17 next season and get a similar contract.muirinho wrote:How much do academy lads earn? Mafff had a very long list (33) of players that could/should go - some of them academy. Anybody care to have a go at pricing wages for this lot?NewCorkSeth wrote:Cheers for calculating that! I hoped we would be closer and someone could say my estimates on salary were a little generous..Snowflake Royal wrote: Income is about £18m. Wages are about £30m.
£70k + £30k is £100k a week or £5.2m a year. So only about halfway there.
Potentially there is some bonuses in their too for these players?
Looks like shifting Gunter and McCleary is more important than i thought. Both must be on or around 20k a week.
https://twitter.com/maffff/status/1125186559467315200
https://twitter.com/maffff/status/1125186561405067264
He's not even including players already out on loan for part of next season (Mannone and Aloku).
I'd love to keep McCleary and Gunter - but I don't think we can. Unless club can persuade them to take serious salary cuts (Gunter has definitely done this before, but on getting a new contract, not on an existing one)
Lots of the players we'll be moving on are decent players, who've done their best for the club - it won't all be overpaid Gourlay nonsense. Just hope the fanbase treat them with some respect and don't come over all "you were crap anyway"
Possibly even worse. It was £35.3 million and £17.9 million last yearZip wrote:Ian are you sure that wages are that much higher than income? I know things are bad but those figures are horrible.
Broadly, if not generous.Zip wrote:Ian are you sure that wages are that much higher than income? I know things are bad but those figures are horrible.
I wish we just knew who was earning what. I mean the summer we signed Aluko must have covered the outgoing wages by himself. Mannone was apparently our highest paid player.Snowflake Royal wrote:Broadly, if not generous.Zip wrote:Ian are you sure that wages are that much higher than income? I know things are bad but those figures are horrible.
I feel like I've been saying every year for at least five years that we need to heavily cut the wage bill, for people to list a handful of players leaving, ignoring the incoming, and claiming that'll have done the job, only to find out 18 months later when the accounts are published that I wasn't far off.
You feel like that, because you honestly think you’re right all of the time and you know everything.Snowflake Royal wrote:Broadly, if not generous.Zip wrote:Ian are you sure that wages are that much higher than income? I know things are bad but those figures are horrible.
I feel like I've been saying every year for at least five years that we need to heavily cut the wage bill, for people to list a handful of players leaving, ignoring the incoming, and claiming that'll have done the job, only to find out 18 months later when the accounts are published that I wasn't far off.
In 2017 we spent a fortune on incomings and I cannot think of a single decent transfer fee we brought into the club. AAH left for not very much and Williams left on a free.NewCorkSeth wrote:I wish we just knew who was earning what. I mean the summer we signed Aluko must have covered the outgoing wages by himself. Mannone was apparently our highest paid player.Snowflake Royal wrote:Broadly, if not generous.Zip wrote:Ian are you sure that wages are that much higher than income? I know things are bad but those figures are horrible.
I feel like I've been saying every year for at least five years that we need to heavily cut the wage bill, for people to list a handful of players leaving, ignoring the incoming, and claiming that'll have done the job, only to find out 18 months later when the accounts are published that I wasn't far off.
It seems like we make good outgoing transfers and then bring in some overpaid players immediately putting us in the shit.
Appalling mismanagement. Our match day revenue will have fallen even further this season as our average gate has slumped to 14, 992. Not good.muirinho wrote:Possibly even worse. It was £35.3 million and £17.9 million last yearZip wrote:Ian are you sure that wages are that much higher than income? I know things are bad but those figures are horrible.
https://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/foot ... s-16148960
Didn't we sell Beerens for quite a bit - more than we paid for him?Zip wrote:In 2017 we spent a fortune on incomings and I cannot think of a single decent transfer fee we brought into the club. AAH left for not very much and Williams left on a free.NewCorkSeth wrote:I wish we just knew who was earning what. I mean the summer we signed Aluko must have covered the outgoing wages by himself. Mannone was apparently our highest paid player.Snowflake Royal wrote: Broadly, if not generous.
I feel like I've been saying every year for at least five years that we need to heavily cut the wage bill, for people to list a handful of players leaving, ignoring the incoming, and claiming that'll have done the job, only to find out 18 months later when the accounts are published that I wasn't far off.
It seems like we make good outgoing transfers and then bring in some overpaid players immediately putting us in the shit.
Yep good call although it was in 2018. The financial damage was in 2017.URZZZZ wrote:Didn't we sell Beerens for quite a bit - more than we paid for him?Zip wrote:In 2017 we spent a fortune on incomings and I cannot think of a single decent transfer fee we brought into the club. AAH left for not very much and Williams left on a free.NewCorkSeth wrote: I wish we just knew who was earning what. I mean the summer we signed Aluko must have covered the outgoing wages by himself. Mannone was apparently our highest paid player.
It seems like we make good outgoing transfers and then bring in some overpaid players immediately putting us in the shit.
I think transfer fees are often accounted for differently and don't always get paid in lump sums anyway.Zip wrote:Surely our income will have been boosted by the sales of Bacuna and Ilori. Plus their wages are off the books along with Edwards too. If Aluko and Mannone’s wages are being paid by the loan clubs then that closes the income/wage gap a little more.
While other teams' parachute payments and ambitions/reckless owners are certainly part of it, another is that we have been overextending ourself in recent seasons. Swiss Ramble posted a good thread on the most recent (2017/18) financials today. When you dig into the relative numbers, you see where the issues are:Elm Park Kid wrote:The issue is that in any one season you'll have a number of teams receiving parachute payments and a few more whose owners are rolling the dice and spending significantly more than they earn. So even if Reading were able to boost their income up towards those of the 'big boys', in all likelihood our wage budget would still be tens of millions behind the biggest spenders.
We need to go back to basics and just make sure that we have players in every position who meet the minimal standard required in this league. Don't spend £5m on a new forward if you don't have an established left back.
Only ones we sold in 2017 were Hurtado, Cooper, Samuel and Stacey. Imagine cooper may have gone for a bit, not sure though. Others would have been minimal I’d have thoughtZip wrote:Yep good call although it was in 2018. The financial damage was in 2017.URZZZZ wrote:Didn't we sell Beerens for quite a bit - more than we paid for him?Zip wrote:
In 2017 we spent a fortune on incomings and I cannot think of a single decent transfer fee we brought into the club. AAH left for not very much and Williams left on a free.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MICKLEOVER ROYAL and 236 guests