Then those people already know who he is and can see he is making a bit of a tit of himself without needing my comment for them to see that. But I fail to see how it will be a "slur on his good name within his field of business" if no-one in his field of business knows that he posts on here under the name of Schards (except those of course who know his real name as well).Royal Lady wrote:It might make people think twice before asking his advice in future - and there are plenty on here who know his real name. And do not patronise me please. My comment, unlike yours, was fair to make.Wycombe Royal wrote:oooohhhhhh.....Royal Lady wrote:What the hell has offering financial advice got to do with anything??? That could be read as a slur on his good name within his field of business and has NOTHING to do with his arguments on here.
Calm down dear its only a discussion forum.
Unless he goes by the name of Schards in his business environment I don't see how it could be a slur on his good name within his field of business.
I cant see where anyone suggested you did, the point regarding Schards profession is that he is obviously intelligent, and many on here cannot understand his view on this matter, not really a slur on how he does his job. Doubt that will make you feel better tho..Royal Lady wrote:When I have insulted anyone on this thread?
Now why couldn't I have put it like that......The 17 Bus wrote:the point regarding Schards profession is that he is obviously intelligent, and many on here cannot understand his view on this matter, not really a slur on how he does his job.
Spot onBehindu wrote:
The actual issue is not whether there are a few hundred people not buying tickets but whether expansion is justified, your 'facts' do nothing to show that expansion is not justified because you have delved off into a side show and ignored all the other points made that debunk your line of thinking.
The fact that people don't understand or agree with my view doesn't excuse the remarkable level of abuse which has now involved the political party I vote for and how I do my job.The 17 Bus wrote:I cant see where anyone suggested you did, the point regarding Schards profession is that he is obviously intelligent, and many on here cannot understand his view on this matter, not really a slur on how he does his job. Doubt that will make you feel better tho..Royal Lady wrote:When I have insulted anyone on this thread?
Royal Lady wrote:It might make people think twice before asking his advice in future - and there are plenty on here who know his real name. And do not patronise me please. My comment, unlike yours, was fair to make.Wycombe Royal wrote:oooohhhhhh.....Royal Lady wrote:What the hell has offering financial advice got to do with anything??? That could be read as a slur on his good name within his field of business and has NOTHING to do with his arguments on here.
Calm down dear its only a discussion forum.
Unless he goes by the name of Schards in his business environment I don't see how it could be a slur on his good name within his field of business.
That's because THEY removed it.The 17 Bus wrote:I cant see where anyone suggested you did, the point regarding Schards profession is that he is obviously intelligent, and many on here cannot understand his view on this matter, not really a slur on how he does his job. Doubt that will make you feel better tho..Royal Lady wrote:When I have insulted anyone on this thread?
Personally I don't think you've received any 'remarkable level of abuse' here, but any that you have been subjected to probably has more to with you're tone and comments you've made as opposed to the other parties understanding of, or agreement with, your views.Schards#2 wrote:The fact that people don't understand or agree with my view doesn't excuse the remarkable level of abuse which has now involved the political party I vote for and how I do my job.
ah ok I missed that fair do's, i bow to the knowledge that it was posted in that case. Carry on all.Royal Lady wrote:That's because THEY removed it.The 17 Bus wrote:I cant see where anyone suggested you did, the point regarding Schards profession is that he is obviously intelligent, and many on here cannot understand his view on this matter, not really a slur on how he does his job. Doubt that will make you feel better tho..Royal Lady wrote:When I have insulted anyone on this thread?
I think you mean after two successful(?!) seasons in the top flight rather than NOW.Royal Lady wrote:I can't be bothered to be honest. We'll see in the future if expanding NOW is right or not, until then I'm out.
Maybe, but at that point the decision will have been based on the facts and not the crap that you have come out with, although I'm sure one of your points might have some truth in it........Schards#2 wrote:What makes it worse is that if the club decided not to proceed, the likes of Behindu will duly U-turn and support the club's decision.
It's no good you getting punchy when everyone's gone homeThe 17 Bus wrote:Get back in the ring this is typical of you Sybil
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests