bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
in their first team every week ?
i dont consider that to be a shocker matee
flop of the summer has to be....Dossena at Liverpool
by jack_symmons » 04 Dec 2008 19:24
04 Dec 2008 19:24bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
by bishbosh92 » 04 Dec 2008 19:27
04 Dec 2008 19:27jack_symmons wrote:bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
in their first team every week ?
i dont consider that to be a shocker matee
flop of the summer has to be....Dossena at Liverpool
by jack_symmons » 04 Dec 2008 19:29
04 Dec 2008 19:29fair comment matebishbosh92 wrote:jack_symmons wrote:bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
in their first team every week ?
i dont consider that to be a shocker matee
flop of the summer has to be....Dossena at Liverpool
Yh maybe but missing key chances and not makign much of an impact tbh m8
greed wiv dossena tho waste of money
+1bishbosh92 wrote: greed wiv dossena tho waste of money
And in English?bishbosh92 wrote:
Yh maybe but missing key chances and not makign much of an impact tbh m8
greed wiv dossena tho waste of money
by andrew1957 » 04 Dec 2008 20:40
04 Dec 2008 20:40by SCIAG » 04 Dec 2008 20:46
04 Dec 2008 20:46Undisclosed, so very few actually know. I suspect it was more than that.andrew1957 wrote:Does anyone know what we actually got for Shorey. Some reports quote £3M and some £3.5M?
by heathrow royal » 04 Dec 2008 20:50
04 Dec 2008 20:50bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
by Platypuss » 04 Dec 2008 20:51
04 Dec 2008 20:51by heathrow royal » 04 Dec 2008 21:00
04 Dec 2008 21:00AgreedPlatypuss wrote:That list doesn't have Anton Ferdinand on it, so is flawed from the start.
by AlexY25 » 04 Dec 2008 21:11
04 Dec 2008 21:11+1heathrow royal wrote:AgreedPlatypuss wrote:That list doesn't have Anton Ferdinand on it, so is flawed from the start.
by heathrow royal » 04 Dec 2008 21:13
04 Dec 2008 21:13by AlexY25 » 04 Dec 2008 21:14
04 Dec 2008 21:14heathrow royal wrote:Darn it left myself open to an easy +1 opportunity
by bishbosh92 » 04 Dec 2008 21:45
04 Dec 2008 21:45Fair point there, but stoke no wat kitson is capable of as he proved it in our second year in the prem where he had a decent season. there fans must be wondering whats happened to him through the summerheathrow royal wrote:bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
Dont get me wrong but Kitson started most of the games at the beginning of the season but was always being subbed aroung the 60-65 minute mark. I know he has now picked another knee injury which is ruling him out.
Some Stoke fans most be thinking we signed a £5 million pound striker when is he going to start scoring.
by rg6royal » 04 Dec 2008 21:52
04 Dec 2008 21:52He had a decent season yet he didn't help (along with the other strikers) score aplenty of goals to keep us in the PL.bishbosh92 wrote:Fair point there, but stoke no wat kitson is capable of as he proved it in our second year in the prem where he had a decent season. there fans must be wondering whats happened to him through the summerheathrow royal wrote:bishbosh92 wrote:Kison Shoreys done k
Zoltan gera for fulham
hes had a shocker
Dont get me wrong but Kitson started most of the games at the beginning of the season but was always being subbed aroung the 60-65 minute mark. I know he has now picked another knee injury which is ruling him out.
Some Stoke fans most be thinking we signed a £5 million pound striker when is he going to start scoring.
by From Despair To Where? » 04 Dec 2008 23:06
04 Dec 2008 23:06by Wycombe Royal » 05 Dec 2008 09:31
05 Dec 2008 09:31According to Stoke fans that was not the intention. Pulis was actively trying to bring in wingers to the club and therefore change the way they played but the deals never materialised (Pennant and Ledley were two of them). Unfortunately for Stoke Kitson arrived first and without those wingers he was never going to work.From Despair To Where? wrote:The biggest flaw in the Kitson transfer is him signing for the one Premiership team guaranteed to not play to his strengths.
by tom_t69 » 05 Dec 2008 09:49
05 Dec 2008 09:49by bishbosh92 » 05 Dec 2008 10:16
05 Dec 2008 10:16Yeah got a good point there if they had better wingers who could put in good balls in the box he would do well for stoke. but doesnt matter anyway we got a decent amount of cash for him so im laughing at seeing him flop lol. :LWycombe Royal wrote:According to Stoke fans that was not the intention. Pulis was actively trying to bring in wingers to the club and therefore change the way they played but the deals never materialised (Pennant and Ledley were two of them). Unfortunately for Stoke Kitson arrived first and without those wingers he was never going to work.From Despair To Where? wrote:The biggest flaw in the Kitson transfer is him signing for the one Premiership team guaranteed to not play to his strengths.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 36 guests