No it was 1-1.Kitsondinho wrote:All the little Englanders phoning 606 and talking about how Barca are a one man team, over hyped etc........still beat Chelsea!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
......even Lovejoy is at it now.....Barca over rated.....did they not win?
Also, using the 'state and slate' technique with regard to the Henry penalty shout last week meant that he could scratch off one of tonight's without sounding too sore.Silver Fox wrote:Impressed that Hiddink mentions missed chances before the pens, until Shreeves drags the beef out of him, almost magnanimous, no wonder he's not staying
Although as I type he's getting more in the Stamford Bridge groove
Dunno about creating more chances but they were the only team actually trying to play football and not destroy it - at the risk of sounding philosophical where's the fun in winning the way that Chelsea do?TBM wrote:Over the two legs Barca played the better football, created more chances, created more clear cut chances and scored an away goal. Chelsea put 9 behind the ball in the first leg and relied on the long ball whilst Barca played the passing game in both legs - so really the best team DID win
Chelsea simply played long ball to Drogba in both games. What clear cut chances did Chelsea really have tonight?earleyroyal wrote:Dunno about creating more chances but they were the only team actually trying to play football and not destroy it - at the risk of sounding philosophical where's the fun in winning the way that Chelsea do?TBM wrote:Over the two legs Barca played the better football, created more chances, created more clear cut chances and scored an away goal. Chelsea put 9 behind the ball in the first leg and relied on the long ball whilst Barca played the passing game in both legs - so really the best team DID win
or don't
because the media like barcaweybridgewanderer wrote:why did iniesta not get booked for taking his shirt off?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests