well I can't say it's been a roaring successPepe the Horseman wrote:I'm almost a bit disappointed now. Was looking forward to it being a complete failure.
They haven't sneaked it past anyone. It's been widely discussed and the new format had been criticised by manyOrion1871 wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/mjshrimper/s ... 5573776384
You know they have just sneaked a 36-team Champions League with 225 games & VIP passes for two ESL-type clubs past the lot of you, right?
Fans of premier league fans can no longer celebrate a goal properly.Simmops wrote:Get a grip. VAR isn't ruining the game.JR wrote:I’ve been debating with mates all evening and have been the lone voice in seeing the potential in the ESL.
It will be a much more attractive option to viewers and broadcasters than the waining UCL.
Traditional football rights have peaked and with new types of forms of broadcast and players in the content market, it’s critical to get the product right.
This new “Swiss style” UCL approved today sounds horrendous and clearly not the solution for maximising broadcast revenues for the game.
The Dirty Dozen clearly don’t trust UEFA to organise an effective competition and maximise the media rights.
They’ve taken the nuclear route to negotiation which is a risky tactic. Time will tell if they achieve it by but they will have concessions planned.
I suspect governing bodies to cut the rhetoric and get in line when they get in to negotiations and some form of promotion / relegation and 2nd tier ESL brought in to get to a compromise.
VAR is ruining the game. The ESL will not.
Did he not read up on the history before taking ownership of the club? If you piss off the supporters then they will not stop until they have achieved the result they want, he would have known this if he had any interest in football. Good luck to him, he is going to need it.Uke wrote:Grovelling apology from the owner of the Merseyside Reds franchise just now
He apologises to the fans of the franchise explaining how they are important and refers to the club using the popular nickname “LFC” that the fans always use
https://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/first- ... supporters
Yep. FSG need to be looking for a buyer from now. Title or no title the fans will want them gone now.NathStPaul wrote:Did he not read up on the history before taking ownership of the club? If you piss off the supporters then they will not stop until they have achieved the result they want, he would have known this if he had any interest in football. Good luck to him, he is going to need it.Uke wrote:Grovelling apology from the owner of the Merseyside Reds franchise just now
He apologises to the fans of the franchise explaining how they are important and refers to the club using the popular nickname “LFC” that the fans always use
https://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/first- ... supporters
If you hear him using it in the audio, it’s clear it’s just another franchise and how it is listed on his spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations to the board. No feeling or genuine empathy at all.Silver Fox wrote:I think you're trying a bit hard slating the use of LFC there Uke. That seems like a reasonable enough statement from Henry who, as Stranded says, is going to have to mend some serious bridges here.
The main thing that has come out of this for me is don't these clubs have big expensive PR teams? This announcement couldn't have been rolled out worse if they got DD to plan it.
I actually did propose this to UEFA and FIFA when I did another VAR presentation, and they did not like itSilver Fox wrote:I think you're trying a bit hard slating the use of LFC there Uke. That seems like a reasonable enough statement from Henry who, as Stranded says, is going to have to mend some serious bridges here.
The main thing that has come out of this for me is don't these clubs have big expensive PR teams? This announcement couldn't have been rolled out worse if they got DD to plan it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests