I have received nothing , other than a text....................and I waved goodbye to my money back in MayRev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:I saw the short sleeve version in the club shop yesterday, and I have to say it looked a lot better than the one in the press release. The way the hoops on the sleeves joined the rest of the shirt didn't look anywhere near as awkward and the different colour sleeves were not as noticable.
Mind you, apparently all STHs were meant to be sent a voucher to claim £5 off - I know I haven't received one yet.
I'm still really annoyed about this league rule about hoops/stripes. Can you imagine what would happen if the league suggested a rule whereby all names and numbers had to be written in white, so Spurs, Bolton, &c would have to change their traditional colours (or even to red, so that Man United, Arsenal, Liverpool, &c would have to change their colours)? It just wouldn't happen. So why is it acceptable to make us, Newcastle, Shef United, &c have to change our traditional colours?midlandadie wrote:Its ok apart from that stupid collar! the best shirt was the home one from are division 2 title winning team back in the nineties! when we had hoops all the way round!
I thought S'land still had their stripes?!Bernals Dreads wrote:Spot on rabidee!
Have Newcastle changed their kit to not having stripes on the back though? Only they had stripes on the back last year and I didn't think they were changing their home kit this term.
I don't see why us and other teams it affects can't have numbers and player names in a coloured panel on the back like we have done in the past.
I did a tour of St James Park a couple of weeks ago. The tour guide told us that the ruling re patches on the back of shirts applied only to EUFA games - and that Newcastle were having one strip for the Prem (with stripes at the back and red numbers) and one for Europe (with a patch). Interesting to see if he got it right.Jay wrote:I thought S'land still had their stripes?!Bernals Dreads wrote:Spot on rabidee!
Have Newcastle changed their kit to not having stripes on the back though? Only they had stripes on the back last year and I didn't think they were changing their home kit this term.
I don't see why us and other teams it affects can't have numbers and player names in a coloured panel on the back like we have done in the past.
I forget, what league are Sunderland in again?Jay wrote:I thought S'land still had their stripes?!Bernals Dreads wrote:Spot on rabidee!
Have Newcastle changed their kit to not having stripes on the back though? Only they had stripes on the back last year and I didn't think they were changing their home kit this term.
I don't see why us and other teams it affects can't have numbers and player names in a coloured panel on the back like we have done in the past.
Maybe the club were really being really far-sighted last season, then?!...West Stand Man wrote:I did a tour of St James Park a couple of weeks ago. The tour guide told us that the ruling re patches on the back of shirts applied only to EUFA games - and that Newcastle were having one strip for the Prem (with stripes at the back and red numbers) and one for Europe (with a patch). Interesting to see if he got it right.
From a distance (and especially on telly), red against blue didn't always stand out. Remember back in the nineties, when we were pretty tight/cheap? You could see the blue and white underneath the very thinly-printed number. Anyway, this is a blanket rule, not one aimed specifically at us, or directly in response to us. I still think that it's an absurd over-reaction.Farnborough Royal wrote:You could see the numbers when the numbers were red. I don't see the problem.
But isn't their kit the same kit they wore last season?Rawlie19 wrote:I forget, what league are Sunderland in again?Jay wrote:I thought S'land still had their stripes?!Bernals Dreads wrote:Spot on rabidee!
Have Newcastle changed their kit to not having stripes on the back though? Only they had stripes on the back last year and I didn't think they were changing their home kit this term.
I don't see why us and other teams it affects can't have numbers and player names in a coloured panel on the back like we have done in the past.
Er.......we were talking about the QPR shirt.......JC wrote:Plain blue backs, but the back of the sleeves are white.Harold wrote:Looks like it's hoops all round Spacey. You can just see the seam on the side of the shirt....SpaceCruiser wrote: What is on the back, though?
http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/pa ... 19,00.html
All in the shirt and voucher threadAlan Titchmarsh wrote:So have we all had out discount vouchers for both shirt and book yet??? Or will that work out to be another farce like last summer's money off deals with some local businesses?
Having gone in today I noticed that the "neater version" on display, where the hoops on the sleeves join up with the hoops on the front, only appears to exist for one size. The rest all look as shoody as before. I didn't bother buying it in the end. The big blue back panel also looks awful unless you put a name and number on it.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:I saw the short sleeve version in the club shop yesterday, and I have to say it looked a lot better than the one in the press release. The way the hoops on the sleeves joined the rest of the shirt didn't look anywhere near as awkward and the different colour sleeves were not as noticable.
Mind you, apparently all STHs were meant to be sent a voucher to claim £5 off - I know I haven't received one yet.
My kids made the same comment so a smart marketing move there!Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:Having gone in today I noticed that the "neater version" on display, where the hoops on the sleeves join up with the hoops on the front, only appears to exist for one size. The rest all look as shoody as before. I didn't bother buying it in the end. The big blue back panel also looks awful unless you put a name and number on it.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:I saw the short sleeve version in the club shop yesterday, and I have to say it looked a lot better than the one in the press release. The way the hoops on the sleeves joined the rest of the shirt didn't look anywhere near as awkward and the different colour sleeves were not as noticable.
Mind you, apparently all STHs were meant to be sent a voucher to claim £5 off - I know I haven't received one yet.
How did you know what the stiching would be like this was posted over a month ago and is almost spot on what the shirt looks like. Club must of seen the thread and thought that looks good not!!!!!!!!!rfcfan13 wrote:The club sent out some trial versions of the new strip.
It took a while, but in the end I feel it was worthwhile. Only problem was that they sent out the wrong colour thread, it should infact be blue.
I should add that the club have informed me that the Puma transfers are to be sent out at a later date.
Judging by the serious quality problems now being experienced, looks like they also employed rfcfan13 to make them!!reading98 wrote:How did you know what the stiching would be like this was posted over a month ago and is almost spot on what the shirt looks like. Club must of seen the thread and thought that looks good not!!!!!!!!!rfcfan13 wrote:The club sent out some trial versions of the new strip.
It took a while, but in the end I feel it was worthwhile. Only problem was that they sent out the wrong colour thread, it should infact be blue.
I should add that the club have informed me that the Puma transfers are to be sent out at a later date.![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests