Whore JackieSanguineURZZZZ
Something in that
It’s about making that balance. Sure, having Trent on the pitch increase our chance of scoring but to what extent does it increase our chances of conceding? In games of “fine margins”, is it worth that risk? Given our manager is safety first, there’s your answer
It doesn’t make Southgate “right” or “wrong”, he sticks to his approach (an approach which has got us a semi final and final) because football is all about different people having different takes on the game. It’d be rather dull if everyone was unanimous
It does shine a light on how systems make players. Guardiola commented at the weekend that for all his brilliance, Haaland needs 'his mates' to get him the ball in the right places. TAA's excellence in recent seasons at Liverpool has been supported by a) the pace and positioning of their centre-backs in Van Dijk, Matip and Gomez and b) the willing cover provided by Henderson and Fabinho when he is in an attacking position. For England, Maguire just isn't as mobile a defender, and our defensive midfielders are more of a traditional roaming band of two through the middle than flexible pressers of the football and alternative full-backs.
So yeah, Southgate will stick to his way, but it feels increasingly like a waste. As great as Bellingham was against Italy recently, he is a different player altogether for Dortmund. Likewise Foden has more ineffective games for England than he does City.
That's been the case for as long as I can remember. Massively agree on Foden, Bellingham and TAA. Mount too always looks much better for Chelsea. Conversely, there's always some players who somehow look better for England. Maguire, Shaw and Pickford spring to mind. Going back, always thought Platt excelled more in an England shirt.
Foden, Mount and TAA all play with better players are their club. Maguire, Shaw and Pickford less so.