No, because it was handball!Handsome Man wrote:Wow - was that handball the worse decision in a major game since all those Swansea free kicks in the play-off final?
No, because it was handball!Handsome Man wrote:Wow - was that handball the worse decision in a major game since all those Swansea free kicks in the play-off final?
Can you explain your working please?paultheroyal wrote:No, because it was handball!Handsome Man wrote:Wow - was that handball the worse decision in a major game since all those Swansea free kicks in the play-off final?
So here's a thought. If you hate football so much - just fcuk off to Non League and stop boring us with your opinions.Royal Rother wrote:Can't say I particularly enjoyed that game.
Seemed to be lacking something.
I dunno - roll on August when the Combined Counties League restarts.
Always good to squeeze a reaction out of dear dear Leon.leon wrote:So here's a thought. If you hate football so much - just fcuk off to Non League and stop boring us with your opinions.Royal Rother wrote:Can't say I particularly enjoyed that game.
Seemed to be lacking something.
I dunno - roll on August when the Combined Counties League restarts.
You were giving us your opinions on Adkins reign when you hadn't even seen his team play.
And I'm always happy to give one.Royal Rother wrote:Always good to squeeze a reaction out of dear dear Leon.leon wrote:So here's a thought. If you hate football so much - just fcuk off to Non League and stop boring us with your opinions.Royal Rother wrote:Can't say I particularly enjoyed that game.
Seemed to be lacking something.
I dunno - roll on August when the Combined Counties League restarts.
You were giving us your opinions on Adkins reign when you hadn't even seen his team play.
paultheroyal wrote:No, because it was handball!Handsome Man wrote:Wow - was that handball the worse decision in a major game since all those Swansea free kicks in the play-off final?
Incredibly harsh to give that as handball, especially when there was a penalty shout for another unintentional ball the hand at the other end (with the player about ten yards away) that was waved away.No Fixed Abode wrote:paultheroyal wrote:No, because it was handball!Handsome Man wrote:Wow - was that handball the worse decision in a major game since all those Swansea free kicks in the play-off final?
Yep. Definitely the correct decision to disallow it. The ball wouldn't have gone in had it not struck Neymars hand. He didn't mean to do it but still would have gained an unfair advantage.
Where the ball goes or was going to go has no relation to it be handball though so yeah, harsh.No Fixed Abode wrote:Harsh? It hit his hand and went in the net.It would have gone wide otherwise.
Yep - it was handball. End of deb8.Hoop Blah wrote:Where the ball goes or was going to go has no relation to it be handball though so yeah, harsh.No Fixed Abode wrote:Harsh? It hit his hand and went in the net.It would have gone wide otherwise.
Exactly my thoughts.TBM wrote:It was like Ba's goal against us for Newcastle. Everyone was saying it shouldn't have stood - this was no different
The ball was skimming off Neymars head wide until it hit his hand and diverted it in the net.Royal Rother wrote:Observation - the change in direction of the ball caused by the deflection off Neymar's completely wrong-footed Buffon.
There is nothing in the rules of handball that make any mention on consequence.Royal Rother wrote:The handball caused the goal of that there is no doubt.
I really can't be arsed to seek out the exact wording of the relevant Laws of The Game but to be honest I cannot see any good reason why that should be allowed to stand as a goal.
The fact that it was accidental should be irrelevant.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 07 Jun 2015 16:03
07 Jun 2015 16:03But it was his own fault..... his sh*t header and his outstretched handtmesis wrote:There is nothing in the rules of handball that make any mention on consequence.Royal Rother wrote:The handball caused the goal of that there is no doubt.
I really can't be arsed to seek out the exact wording of the relevant Laws of The Game but to be honest I cannot see any good reason why that should be allowed to stand as a goal.
The fact that it was accidental should be irrelevant.
It's essentially, i, then it's handball. Other than that, it's not handball. If it deflects into the goal, or prevents a goal, it makes no difference to whether it is handball or not.
The rule is there to stop cheating, not to prevent good fortune.
Saying "I can't be bothered to find out what the rule is, but I'll give my opinion anyway" means you have a good potential career as a pundit for ITV.
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot] and 28 guests