Pictures??Coppelled Streets wrote:Chelsea have already unveiled their new kit for next season, anyone know if we're close to doing the same?
by who are ya? » 17 Mar 2008 17:13
17 Mar 2008 17:13Pictures??Coppelled Streets wrote:Chelsea have already unveiled their new kit for next season, anyone know if we're close to doing the same?
by Rawlie19 » 21 Mar 2008 14:16
21 Mar 2008 14:16Yes yes, we've heard that before. Surely everyone is entitled to wear whatever he or she pleases? I think people who wear a tie to work are twats (sorry bout that everyone) but that's just me.voyeur wrote:Anyone over the age of twelve who wears a replica shirt is pcunt
by Coppelled Streets » 21 Mar 2008 16:12
21 Mar 2008 16:12Google them. Fat Frank was in one a few weeks ago in a weekend paper. Yellow ish trim around a white colour. Yuk!who are ya? wrote:Pictures??Coppelled Streets wrote:Chelsea have already unveiled their new kit for next season, anyone know if we're close to doing the same?

by hiro » 23 Mar 2008 09:37
23 Mar 2008 09:37
by Forbury Lion » 23 Mar 2008 15:59
23 Mar 2008 15:59by brendywendy » 23 Mar 2008 18:17
23 Mar 2008 18:17by Stuka » 24 Mar 2008 13:06
24 Mar 2008 13:06That's a very scary interest in the shirt sponsor you have there.hiro wrote:Well, I am not expert of business analysis, so I don't know whether sponsoring Reading Kit for 5 million pounds a year( is it?) is worth it or not.
Kyocera has 180 subsidiaries and group companies, and they have over 63000 employee worldwide. Turnover in year 2006 was about 6000 million pounds and profit was around 500 million pounds. So would they need to quit sponsoring Reading soon?
Like JVC did to Arsenal, Sharp did to Man U, I only hope Kyocera continue partnership with Reading for many years to come until Reading got really big club like current Big four.
2007-08 away shirts of Kyocera's Kyoto Sanga FC.
by Rhys The Royal » 04 Apr 2008 15:23
04 Apr 2008 15:23by West Stand Man » 04 Apr 2008 15:47
04 Apr 2008 15:47Hmmm. So if the dress code in the office is ties you would get the sack rather than be a 'twat'? I think not, if the job is good and the pay is too. Plenty of jobs like that I am afraid.Rawlie19 wrote: Yes yes, we've heard that before. Surely everyone is entitled to wear whatever he or she pleases? I think people who wear a tie to work are twats (sorry bout that everyone) but that's just me.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 04 Apr 2008 19:46
04 Apr 2008 19:46worse are people who wear ties at the weekend. There's just something wrong there.West Stand Man wrote:Hmmm. So if the dress code in the office is ties you would get the sack rather than be a 'twat'? I think not, if the job is good and the pay is too. Plenty of jobs like that I am afraid.Rawlie19 wrote: Yes yes, we've heard that before. Surely everyone is entitled to wear whatever he or she pleases? I think people who wear a tie to work are twats (sorry bout that everyone) but that's just me.
by seahawk10 » 04 Apr 2008 20:50
04 Apr 2008 20:50by Rhys The Royal » 05 Apr 2008 14:50
05 Apr 2008 14:5050p?seahawk10 wrote:Half-priced shirts on the website and in the club megastore. I just bought a Matejovsky 28 away hoops. Also got a championship t-shirt for $1 and a half-priced polo. Get in!
by Rawlie19 » 06 Apr 2008 14:52
06 Apr 2008 14:52I don't understand why there needs to be a dress code that says you HAVE to wear a particular item of clothing (that is good for absolutely nothing... unless you're using it for a bib?). Surely so long as you are dressed smartly then what's the problem?West Stand Man wrote:Hmmm. So if the dress code in the office is ties you would get the sack rather than be a 'twat'? I think not, if the job is good and the pay is too. Plenty of jobs like that I am afraid.Rawlie19 wrote: Yes yes, we've heard that before. Surely everyone is entitled to wear whatever he or she pleases? I think people who wear a tie to work are twats (sorry bout that everyone) but that's just me.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 06 Apr 2008 18:24
06 Apr 2008 18:24Because some people expect it, particularly in a customer-facing role. To not dress with the formality expected implies a lack of respect or an unprofessional attitude.Rawlie19 wrote:I don't understand why there needs to be a dress code that says you HAVE to wear a particular item of clothing (that is good for absolutely nothing... unless you're using it for a bib?). Surely so long as you are dressed smartly then what's the problem?West Stand Man wrote:Hmmm. So if the dress code in the office is ties you would get the sack rather than be a 'twat'? I think not, if the job is good and the pay is too. Plenty of jobs like that I am afraid.Rawlie19 wrote: Yes yes, we've heard that before. Surely everyone is entitled to wear whatever he or she pleases? I think people who wear a tie to work are twats (sorry bout that everyone) but that's just me.
by Barry the bird boggler » 07 Apr 2008 09:24
07 Apr 2008 09:24Entirely agree, that's why I always wear a tie when I wear my Reading shirt into work.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote: Because some people expect it, particularly in a customer-facing role. To not dress with the formality expected implies a lack of respect or an unprofessional attitude.
Some people feel that having everyone in an office dress in business attire makes people act more business-like.
It all boils down to conforming with society. You can chose to not conform if you wish, but in the long run you'll just be hurting yourself. You may feel, for example, that not wearing a jack & tie to a job interview shouldn't matter as they should judge you for who you are, not what you wear, and you are right (I used to think exactly the same), but the problem is they'd judge you as being the sort of person who couldn't be bothered to dress properly for the interview.
by Rawlie19 » 10 Apr 2008 14:04
10 Apr 2008 14:04by West Stand Man » 10 Apr 2008 14:20
10 Apr 2008 14:20That's not the point though is it? The point is that some employers do have dress codes that are specific, and if you don't want to adhere to them your only optin is to not work there.Rawlie19 wrote:I don't understand why there needs to be a dress code that says you HAVE to wear a particular item of clothing (that is good for absolutely nothing... unless you're using it for a bib?). Surely so long as you are dressed smartly then what's the problem?West Stand Man wrote:Hmmm. So if the dress code in the office is ties you would get the sack rather than be a 'twat'? I think not, if the job is good and the pay is too. Plenty of jobs like that I am afraid.Rawlie19 wrote: Yes yes, we've heard that before. Surely everyone is entitled to wear whatever he or she pleases? I think people who wear a tie to work are twats (sorry bout that everyone) but that's just me.
by Rawlie19 » 10 Apr 2008 14:57
10 Apr 2008 14:57No, I'm going to refuse because I am grossly under qualified and a fan of the club. It bugged me that they kept asking me when Pardew left and I hope that when Coppell finally leaves they don't keep ringing again.West Stand Man wrote:That's not the point though is it? The point is that some employers do have dress codes that are specific, and if you don't want to adhere to them your only optin is to not work there.
For instance, I am willing to bet that there is a clause in the management contracts at Reading requiring them to go to the President's Lounge (Director's Box) after games; the dress code there is jacket and tie. Are you going to refuse to be manager of Reading just because you don't like wearing ties?



by Thaumagurist* » 10 Apr 2008 16:15
10 Apr 2008 16:15Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 136 guests