I would too, but it would kill the atmosphere, not improve it. Why? Because at home games you never get more than 1000 home fans singing, and from having a ST in the North Stand the first time we won promotion to the PL, the noise doesn't carry. It carried when 4000 away fans who were up for it and steaming were singing, but we wouldn't have that. The interaction with the away fans would be zero.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:There should be a standing section, it should be the north stand, and all you Y25ers should move to it.
This is the way to do it. Anything else would be pointless and ignored... or if over-enforced just another reason not to bother with home games.SPARTA wrote:I would too, but it would kill the atmosphere, not improve it. Why? Because at home games you never get more than 1000 home fans singing, and from having a ST in the North Stand the first time we won promotion to the PL, the noise doesn't carry. It carried when 4000 away fans who were up for it and steaming were singing, but we wouldn't have that. The interaction with the away fans would be zero.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:There should be a standing section, it should be the north stand, and all you Y25ers should move to it.
In my mind I would make the top half of the East Stand safe-standing. That way the lower half (4000 ish) can still sit, and the top half, plus 80% the FSF suggest the capacity increases by, get to stand. Best of both worlds for the same stand, and the current interaction with the away fans improves. There is no additional risk of trouble, as there is never any trouble with Reading fans, and if the club wanted to they could net off the area in front of the big screen, and being the top half standing, you can't move forward to get closer to the corner. Just my take on what I'd like.
sandman wrote:I'm sure you're allowed to stand up during matches Ian. After all, It is your living room.
Can't see there being much interest in the West.Winchester Royal wrote:How about the lower west, and the north?
The regular and frequent standing in the East would disagree with you. As would the good away attendences at grounds with terraces. And you'll note I never suggested it would be a majority, or even a large minority.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Nor the North, South and parts of the East....think that you would be surprised at just how many have NEVER stood at a game in their entire life...and just how many that used to (stand)..can't really be bothered to anymore
We have been sleepwalked into the changes over the past 25 years
At my school I get the impression that next to no one has ever stood for 90 minutes and they don't see it as part of the game for fans.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Who's arguing Ian?
Just making my tired old point....with my tired old legs.
Many young supporters (including my own kids), have never stood at a game for 90 minutes+
Good post.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Nor the North, South and parts of the East....think that you would be surprised at just how many have NEVER stood at a game in their entire life...and just how many that used to (stand)..can't really be bothered to anymore
We have been sleepwalked into the changes over the past 25 years
I'd rather campaign to have the roof removed over the away end, so they get soaked when it rains like in the old days.Ian Royal wrote:An obvious place to install it would be at the back of the South stand for the away fans, given they often stand anyway. I wonder if clubs would be brave enough to put in standing in away sections.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 122 guests