This is fair point, mind. I was thinking only yesterday that I can't imagine any solidarity at all between myself as an individual and the supporters trust of the club I support. Just worlds apart in what it means to follow a football club and what we look to get from the experience to the extent that I could follow Fulham instead for all the difference it'd make to either party.starliaison wrote:The one thing that should unite us is Reading FC but it seems to divide us as there are so many ideas on what is best for the club.
^Thissouthbank1871 wrote:Paula, I may not agree with you not wanting someone who attended the fan's forum to soy a summary on here (how about if they did it on an area of the board that you have to be registered to see?), but I can understand it, particularly if you've been out under pressure from the club. However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
More like the left wing loonies who "run" most local councils these days, (shudders in revulsion ....)moonwalklikebas wrote:TBM wrote:The Rouge wrote:4. Are these guys a bunch of helmets?Naaaaaa!TBM wrote:
![]()
Looks like a 80's Book club. Not one of a forward thinking modern football club.
+1 from mesouthbank1871 wrote:Paula, I may not agree with you not wanting someone who attended the fan's forum to soy a summary on here (how about if they did it on an area of the board that you have to be registered to see?), but I can understand it, particularly if you've been out under pressure from the club. However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
Nail. On. Head.southbank1871 wrote:Paula, I may not agree with you not wanting someone who attended the fan's forum to soy a summary on here (how about if they did it on an area of the board that you have to be registered to see?), but I can understand it, particularly if you've been out under pressure from the club. However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
Well there's a blindingly obvious weakness in your organisation I'm afraid STAR. This board may have it's fair share of idiots, WUMs and posters who don't actively watch the team play that often these days but it remains the largest and most active place for dicussion on all things RFC. If STAR don't recognise that and embrace it as the most popular and, believe it or not, representative place for fans to dicuss the progress, successes, failures and issues relating to the club and it's supporter base (that's the one the STAR board have pledged to represent and effectively work for) then it's perfectly understandable the criticism you're having to take.starliaison wrote:At the moment I am the only STAR board member willing to even post on here.
Probably the next logical step on the path to world domination now that he's got his mod status.southbank1871 wrote:Mags for STAR?
I have apologised and Cypry and I have had a conversation (where I got the pm right!) that has sorted things out.southbank1871 wrote:However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
We have had Board members who are some of the most frequent HNA contributors in the past but at present the negativity on here has put off the current members.Hoop Blah wrote:Well there's a blindingly obvious weakness in your organisation I'm afraid STAR. This board may have it's fair share of idiots, WUMs and posters who don't actively watch the team play that often these days but it remains the largest and most active place for dicussion on all things RFC. If STAR don't recognise that and embrace it as the most popular and, believe it or not, representative place for fans to dicuss the progress, successes, failures and issues relating to the club and it's supporter base (that's the one the STAR board have pledged to represent and effectively work for) then it's perfectly understandable the criticism you're having to take.starliaison wrote:At the moment I am the only STAR board member willing to even post on here.
The only other places that come close to this are Twitter and I guess the Facebook pages, but from what I've seen they're an even smaller pool of similar contributors
Have you guys tried recruiting a more representative cross section of support onto the board? Perhaps there should be a drive to encourage a member or two from your ranks with a more positive HNA perception to step up to a board position and engage with the forum some more. It's a massive communication problem if STAR fail to engage with this place. Perhaps you could even have a discussion about co-opting a reliable and forthright NHA contributor onto your board to give the place a voice in your organisation.
As I understand it, there was a bit of a public dressing down as well wasn't there? Or was that just from a couple of regular posters on here that jumped on his back a bit?starliaison wrote:I have apologised and Cypry and I have had a conversation (where I got the pm right!) that has sorted things out.southbank1871 wrote:However, I think it's the way you responded to Cypry that has got most people's backs up. It was his first fan's forum and he wasn't told that he couldn't post a summary on here, so your PM to him was pretty disgraceful IMO and he deserves an apology. I'm sure if you do this, we can all move on.
starliaison wrote:Of course it would mean outing them
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests