by Royal Lady » 04 May 2008 18:09
04 May 2008 18:09
by Coppelled Streets » 04 May 2008 18:34
04 May 2008 18:34When men were men, you could tackle tough, you could stand, swear and not have to listen to the grumpy bastards behind you telling people to sit down.Royal Lady wrote:Division 1 was the Premiership originally. Oh for the old days.
by cmonurz » 04 May 2008 19:40
04 May 2008 19:40And we were shit.Coppelled Streets wrote:When men were men, you could tackle tough, you could stand, swear and not have to listen to the grumpy bastards behind you telling people to sit down.Royal Lady wrote:Division 1 was the Premiership originally. Oh for the old days.
by Alan Partridge » 04 May 2008 20:12
04 May 2008 20:12Get that at Plainmoor, and the shit football.Coppelled Streets wrote:When men were men, you could tackle tough, you could stand, swear and not have to listen to the grumpy bastards behind you telling people to sit down.Royal Lady wrote:Division 1 was the Premiership originally. Oh for the old days.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 04 May 2008 20:17
04 May 2008 20:17When have Americans ever named their leagues like that?Coppelled Streets wrote:Er, no. It was Division 1 before Coca Cola brought in the Championship and replaced the name Division with League. There's the Americanisation.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:In that case shouldn't you be calling it Division 2?Coppelled Streets wrote:
It's Division 1. I hate all this Americanisation bullshit.
by Coppelled Streets » 04 May 2008 22:21
04 May 2008 22:21by Arch » 04 May 2008 22:38
04 May 2008 22:38Were you as bitter about Ryman, Unibond or Blue Square. The fact that this sponsor happens to be an American company is neither here nor there. If the leagues need the cash, they'll take the name. It's a long established English tradition.Coppelled Streets wrote:When Coca Cola agreed the contract to sponsor the Football League they wanted the names of the leagues to change as part of the rebranding exercise. It wasn't a choice of the FA or any other English footballing organisation, it was the sponsor itself.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 04 May 2008 23:24
04 May 2008 23:24Interesting. Where did you get this information from, exactly? A mate in the pub told you, perhaps?Coppelled Streets wrote:When Coca Cola agreed the contract to sponsor the Football League they wanted the names of the leagues to change as part of the rebranding exercise. It wasn't a choice of the FA or any other English footballing organisation, it was the sponsor itself.
by Platypuss » 05 May 2008 07:53
05 May 2008 07:53The IBM speaks again.Coppelled Streets wrote:When Coca Cola agreed the contract to sponsor the Football League they wanted the names of the leagues to change as part of the rebranding exercise. It wasn't a choice of the FA or any other English footballing organisation, it was the sponsor itself.
by Rawlie19 » 06 May 2008 16:47
06 May 2008 16:47How can you be spouting off on one about it not being Division 2 but still spouting on that it's Division 1? 1st Division, 2nd Division, 3rd Division, 4th Division, Non-league, Non-league South, Non-league North, Sunday Leagues. That's what they are.Coppelled Streets wrote:Er, no. It was Division 1 before Coca Cola brought in the Championship and replaced the name Division with League. There's the Americanisation.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:In that case shouldn't you be calling it Division 2?Coppelled Streets wrote: It's Division 1. I hate all this Americanisation bullshit.
by TFF » 12 May 2008 10:08
12 May 2008 10:08I've heard that a three year shirt deal was offered to FSC for a bargain £1.2million - yes, just £400k per season. I believe though that they cooled their interest when forced to commit prior to our league fate being confirmed.Huntley & Palmer wrote:I've just been going through our financials for last year, I don't think FSC have a spare few million to rub together currently
by ArfnipIsARoyal » 12 May 2008 20:11
12 May 2008 20:11Marcus in Daily Mail on Saturday wrote:Went for a jog for 20 minutes after training — sweating all the way in the sun — then off to a photo session for our new kit. What we'd give for it to come with Premier League patches. They told me to look mean. After the past few days, it was the only look I'd packed.
by comeonthebiscuitmen » 14 May 2008 12:02
14 May 2008 12:02Wasn't the Canon League Div 1 on ITV in the 80's?Arch wrote:Were you as bitter about Ryman, Unibond or Blue Square. The fact that this sponsor happens to be an American company is neither here nor there. If the leagues need the cash, they'll take the name. It's a long established English tradition.Coppelled Streets wrote:When Coca Cola agreed the contract to sponsor the Football League they wanted the names of the leagues to change as part of the rebranding exercise. It wasn't a choice of the FA or any other English footballing organisation, it was the sponsor itself.
by Dirk Gently » 14 May 2008 12:19
14 May 2008 12:19by Skyline » 14 May 2008 15:23
14 May 2008 15:23Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests