How did you not know about it?stealthpapes wrote:Wait what there's more to this.Hendo wrote:Was this from Leeds' Flamingo Land trip?stealthpapes wrote:
TO GOOGLE
It is oxf*rd golden.
How did you not know about it?stealthpapes wrote:Wait what there's more to this.Hendo wrote:Was this from Leeds' Flamingo Land trip?stealthpapes wrote:
TO GOOGLE
by Royal Rother » 23 Dec 2018 12:19
23 Dec 2018 12:19by Snowflake Royal » 23 Dec 2018 12:34
23 Dec 2018 12:34by Royal Rother » 31 Dec 2018 16:12
31 Dec 2018 16:12by Victor Meldrew » 31 Dec 2018 17:45
31 Dec 2018 17:45by Royal Rother » 31 Dec 2018 18:21
31 Dec 2018 18:21by Hoop Blah » 01 Jan 2019 09:08
01 Jan 2019 09:08I wouldn't be surprised if the run of easier fixtures was at least a factor in the timing of Mourinho's sacking, in two ways. Firstly it gives the new dawn a good chance of proving the decision right by having an easier start, but also imagine how negative it would've been for the club to go into that run of fixtures under Mourinho and struggle to beat those same teams. It wouldn't have been good for the squad, the share price or their reputation amongst potential transfer targets for January.Victor Meldrew wrote:Can a new manager have ever had an easier set of fixtures for his first 3 games, especially at home to Bournemouth who had lost 9 of their last eleven.
And after yet another easy one in Newcastle it is then the FA Cup and we all know about that one.
Let's see how they do away at Spurs before suggesting that the team and manager are special.
by Hoop Blah » 03 Jan 2019 14:04
03 Jan 2019 14:04I watched the game live and Newcastle, despite being a little too defensive for my taste, more than held their own. United were the better side yes, but Newcastle made a game of it until the last 20 minutes.BR0B0T wrote:Was Alan Shearer doing the editing on MoTD tonight?
Gave the impression that Newcastle were running the game despite Utd's 65% possession and twice as many shots on target
Old Man Andrews wrote:Really poor decision for me. They needed a guy in there who would get the best out of Pogba, Martial and Sanchez, don't think that is OGS.Winston Biscuit wrote:Solskjaer gets it for the remainder of the season
by Old Man Andrews » 03 Jan 2019 14:52
03 Jan 2019 14:52Let's see what happens when they play decent sides. Says a lot about your life that you even remember things like that. You clearly need to get laid.Hendo wrote:Old Man Andrews wrote:Really poor decision for me. They needed a guy in there who would get the best out of Pogba, Martial and Sanchez, don't think that is OGS.Winston Biscuit wrote:Solskjaer gets it for the remainder of the season
Lol. Was merely reading the last couple of pages and noticed the comment. Don't need to get so defensive m9.Old Man Andrews wrote:Let's see what happens when they play decent sides. Says a lot about your life that you even remember things like that. You clearly need to get laid.Hendo wrote:Old Man Andrews wrote:
Really poor decision for me. They needed a guy in there who would get the best out of Pogba, Martial and Sanchez, don't think that is OGS.
by stealthpapes » 03 Jan 2019 16:16
03 Jan 2019 16:16Not sure where I saw or heard it but a take I didn't disagree with was:Royal Rother wrote:Can’t believe what Roy Keane was saying about the situation this week.
He absolutely lambasted the players for “throwing Mourinho under the bus”.
WTAF has that Portuguese oxf*rd been doing to his players for the last 2 years?
And now some tossers in the media are suggesting that yesterday’s 5-1 win is an indication that they really weren’t giving their best under Mourinho.
Unbelievable.
They have been playing to his plans and his instructions under threat of being dropped and named and shamed if they didn’t do as told.
The shackles were off yesterday and they must have felt brilliant. And it showed.
Looks like now that Mourinho has gone the whole narrative is changing to paint him as a victim. Hilarious really.
The guy is a dinosaur, a once brilliant manager but now lightyears behind the progressive managers occupying the Top 5 places in the PL. Can’t see anyone wanting him but more fool any club side in the upper echelons of any decent league that do appoint him - unless it’s on a 1 year non-renewable contract, regardless of the apparent success in that year.
by Hoop Blah » 03 Jan 2019 16:28
03 Jan 2019 16:28Do you mean the first ever? Or the first of his generation?stealthpapes wrote:Sad, as I genuinely think he was one of the first, good tactical innovators in English football. That first Chelsea team was genuinely exciting.
by stealthpapes » 03 Jan 2019 16:54
03 Jan 2019 16:54Well, they're basically the same thing, but more the latter.Hoop Blah wrote:Do you mean the first ever? Or the first of his generation?stealthpapes wrote:Sad, as I genuinely think he was one of the first, good tactical innovators in English football. That first Chelsea team was genuinely exciting.
by stealthpapes » 03 Jan 2019 16:55
03 Jan 2019 16:55by Victor Meldrew » 03 Jan 2019 16:58
03 Jan 2019 16:58I think he has joined those who believe that football only started with the Premier League.Hoop Blah wrote:Do you mean the first ever? Or the first of his generation?stealthpapes wrote:Sad, as I genuinely think he was one of the first, good tactical innovators in English football. That first Chelsea team was genuinely exciting.
by Victor Meldrew » 03 Jan 2019 17:00
03 Jan 2019 17:00Was writing mine before you posted again m'lud.stealthpapes wrote:yeah, tbf, there's a modern missing in there.
Herbert Chapman needs props.
by St Pauli » 03 Jan 2019 19:47
03 Jan 2019 19:47https://www.reddit.com/r/soccerstreams/ ... liverpool/St Pauli wrote:Anyone got a link to a free streaming site? I'm bed ridden with a stomach bug so can't watch it down the local.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests