I'm sure the 400 posts on this thread telling you you're useless pale in significance compared to the deluge of fan mail you doubtless get every week.starliaison wrote:none taken. It has nevertheless grown in numbers and in the opinion of others both locally and nationally,which is enough for me.blindedbythelights wrote:No offence and all that but STAR has been next to awful under your tenure, things can only get better from here
Because it's stated aims are to represent it's members, Reading supporters and the community.melonhead wrote:id imagine looking after its own members was its raisin detra
why would it try to canvass opinion from a load of unnafiliated types?
We have always asked for specifics so that we can remove the dismissal by the club, but if we are aware of problems that are not specifically brought to us we will raise them in an attempt to get them sorted but our hand is stronger if we have a specific complaint hence the request.Hoop Blah wrote:It's not the way it's ever appeared to be handled from an HNA posters point of view though.
All we ever read on here is that you can't take anything posted on here back to STAR or the club because of the anonymity. If anyone has an issue it's usually met with a 'send us an email' response and we'll look into it.
I'd always assume that you don't just filter out all the good suggestions that get made on the board, but there's very little in the way of recognition of what's been taken away as food for thought and discussion at STAR and what's been dismissed as HNA just having a moan.
Yes of course its expected why do you think they are up there??? Also why dont you know about them after all no one have ever been told about them but its an unwritten rule that they are thereHoop Blah wrote:I think I've been on the STAR website 2, maybe 3 times in my life, so no I'm afraid I've never dug around reading meeting minutes and such like on there.
Do you expect people to? I didn't know anything like that existed either.
Hoop Blah wrote:Because it's stated aims are to represent it's members, Reading supporters and the community.melonhead wrote:id imagine looking after its own members was its raisin detra
why would it try to canvass opinion from a load of unnafiliated types?
I'd imagine they also want as many members in STAR as possible. That's not going to happen if they don't try and find out what those people not already members actually want from their group.
southbank1871 wrote:Not sure if serious.
leicsRoyal wrote:send to the club for vetting
its one of the only reasons youd join star though isnt it? to get this kind of inside infoleicsRoyal wrote:southbank1871 wrote:Not sure if serious.
Totally serious.
What a great opportunity for STAR to increase their membership. Get the notes typed up, send to the club for vetting and then stick them out in the big wide world.
Great PR for the club
Great PR and advertising for STAR
OK they are mentioned in the regular email to members, and to those who have registered to get emails from STAR, whenever they are posted and have been mentioned before now on HNA? if not every time.Hoop Blah wrote:I think I've been on the STAR website 2, maybe 3 times in my life, so no I'm afraid I've never dug around reading meeting minutes and such like on there.
Do you expect people to? I didn't know anything like that existed either.
Back to the issue of this being more a nudge, nudge, wink, wink type of group rather than one for the fans.melonhead wrote:its one of the only reasons youd join star though isnt it? to get this kind of inside infoleicsRoyal wrote:southbank1871 wrote:Not sure if serious.
Totally serious.
What a great opportunity for STAR to increase their membership. Get the notes typed up, send to the club for vetting and then stick them out in the big wide world.
Great PR for the club
Great PR and advertising for STAR
if you dont get the coaches, why else would you bother
starliaison wrote: I agree about Club Policies and that is what I read most.
I think the problem is that there is no collective of Reading fans. STAR attempts to represent them, but we do need them to bring us their problems/suggestions We can't guarantee to succeed but, as far as I am aware, any email is taken seriously. We all tend to have our friends at football but I feel that I have a wide range of Reading fans coming to me with problems. Through being Chairman I have got to know a lot of Reading supporters that I would not have known otherwise; it is not perfect but it is more representative than I would have been just talking to the people around me, or in the bar or friends. There is always room for improvement but you do need to start from somewhere.
Fair play for engaging here now and there is plenty of good intent in these posts. My challenge would be that you need to properly understand Reading fans' views. Speaking to people is all well and good but collecting tit-bits of anecdotal opinion is far from adequate. Yes, you will have to simply represent the majority of fans at times but:starliaison wrote:
Quite agree and you are stating the way I approach it, but I am pointing out where there are weaknesses. I have been told at a management meeting that 'there are a lot of other supporters than those on HNA' but pointing out that it is a legitimate source of fan opinion still falls at the anonymity.
RealLOLy?negative discrimination at worst
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 61 guests