by melonhead »
08 Apr 2013 11:15
Alexander Litvinenko I absolutely, absolutely *get* Twitter and its power in being a subject-based social-media. I've also been trained on it and given training on it.
I've seen the power it has when campaigning or trying to get communicate a message quickly and efficiently. It's effectiveness in getting a message out quickly has both sparked revolutions, overthrown dictators and saved lives across the globe. I absolutely do understand the massive power that it has to change the way we communicate and relate to each other.
Which is why I get so pissed off when I see Reading FC using such a phenomenally powerful tool as if it were Facebook (which I agree is pointless rubbish) - and by using it to send out endless banal shite.
The problem is when people - including RFC - don't appreciate the crucial differences between Facebook and Twitter together what you can do with them and how they should be used. Because they are massively different tools.
yet again. i spent a lot of time scrolling through what theyve been putting out. i found very little banal in there, mosly just info on various aspects of the club.
and i say again, if its the banality of the medium youre complaining about- then i respectfully suggest that you dont get it at all.
and massive lol at getting "trained" on twitter
Last edited by
melonhead on 08 Apr 2013 11:18, edited 1 time in total.