by Ian Royal »
13 Jul 2013 14:00
13 Jul 2013 14:00
melonhead wrote:Ian Royal wrote:Cobi wrote:Samuelson also said when the takeover was announced that we will later look at stadium sponsorship as well, and that makes perfect sense with FFP. I don't care what they cal the ground anyway, it's only ever "the football ground" to me.
Don't want the stadium name to change, don't like that sort of sponsorship. Happy to see each stand individually sponsored. I guess I could cope without too much grumbling about 'The "Blah blah" Madejski Stadium'.
Fine with the odd logo tastefully embalzoned on the kit. Short of something on the socks I think we're at the limit of tastefulness now though.
couldnt caere less about he name. the name means nothing.
its not like an ancient historic ground or any thing
Not yet. It will be one day. For me, the club name and the stadium name are the two constants (bar ground moves which happen so rarely) amongst constant flux. It's the inevitable frequent name change that comes with sponsorship that leaves me very very cold.