Actually its the Royals who are front runners ...colski boy's wrote:Apparntly the Royal's are the front runners..
Well he's also wrong on this occasion then, seeing as their career is nothing similar, he won't provide anything like the same level of higher level experience, he's only stepping down a level in the most technical of terms, and he's not going to be the catalyst to win us the league. Not keen on the signing, I'd rather give players like Liburd, Samuel, Cardwell and Novakovich a chance, but he probably won't be a) as injury ruined as Roberts, b) as costly. And he may score a few goals, though I have my doubts.WoodleyRoyal wrote:So Brian is quoted in the getreading article comparing him to the Jason Roberts signing... Ian royaLOL making a oxf*rd of himself since 2004Ian Royal wrote:In what way could it be a Jason Roberts sort of signing?
Roberts was a player with a pedigree of scoring goals where ever he went and was vastly experienced at the highest level of English football. Kermorgant has had a two or three good seasons in the Championship, has never done anything at PL level and at 34 you think he can step back down to the Championship and pick up where he left off in a new team?
Unless you mean we'll pay him for two and a half years whilst getting six months of actual service and a handful of goals. In which case, yay. Not.
An experienced striker who can hit the ground running. Exactly the sort of signing we need right now.msmivie wrote:Aged 34 - Is this really the sort of signing we are looking to make???
UNBELIEVABLE JEFF!!!
ThisRoyal Rother wrote:Jeez. Just play the fcuking youngsters ffs.
This +1000Nameless wrote:It's quite possible to plan long, short and medium term at the same time and without compromising either.
I'd agree Samuels is worth a run in the side but he may not click straightaway and he does have a record of injury. So signing short term, experienced cover whilst also blooding youngsters makes sense.
If we go with Samuel and his does his knee again on Feb 1st guess who will be first to slate the club for not having brought in an extra striker....
You've had a 'mare there RG7ersRG7Fan wrote:Actually its the Royals who are front runners ...colski boy's wrote:Apparntly the Royal's are the front runners..
'greed, we should definitely only sign players who've successfully managed to reverse the aging processRoyal_jimmy wrote:Decent enough record but he isn't getting any younger.
I have indeed ...3points wrote:You've had a 'mare there RG7ersRG7Fan wrote:Actually its the Royals who are front runners ...colski boy's wrote:Apparntly the Royal's are the front runners..
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 123 guests