damn right, I had a £1 on 4-1; I was willing Walsall to get a late consolationIf you still hate Futcher wrote:^Although it would've made things interesting had the shot from Sawyers been a few inches lower
People see what they want to see...Jano wrote:Really struggling to see how people can say Walsall were the better team in the first half, they offered almost nothing going forward except for Sawyers. Admittedly we weren't great, but they were not worrying us at all.
what was happening with their fans and the stewards in the second half. Couldn't see what was going on from the North Stand.paultheroyal wrote:It was pretty evens and cagey for first 20 or so and the second goal killed the game as a contest so attention turned to their fans!!
I said Walsall were the better team in the first half because we were shite until HRK scored. Walsall indeed had more of the balland created a few threats. At no point did I suggest they were dominating......just they were the better of the two teams playing during that section of the game. Once we went ahead, we were much better. During the 2nd half we were dominating them and could of scored 5 or 6.paultheroyal wrote:People see what they want to see...Jano wrote:Really struggling to see how people can say Walsall were the better team in the first half, they offered almost nothing going forward except for Sawyers. Admittedly we weren't great, but they were not worrying us at all.
They had a bit of possession and threatened which means they dominated clearly!!
It was pretty evens and cagey for first 20 or so and the second goal killed the game as a contest so attention turned to their fans!!
It appears that the stewards didn't want to allow that group back into that area, so barricaded the entrance.3points wrote:what was happening with their fans and the stewards in the second half. Couldn't see what was going on from the North Stand.paultheroyal wrote:It was pretty evens and cagey for first 20 or so and the second goal killed the game as a contest so attention turned to their fans!!
Too many sherbets at half time?Winchester Royal wrote:It appears that the stewards didn't want to allow that group back into that area, so barricaded the entrance.3points wrote:what was happening with their fans and the stewards in the second half. Couldn't see what was going on from the North Stand.paultheroyal wrote:It was pretty evens and cagey for first 20 or so and the second goal killed the game as a contest so attention turned to their fans!!
Which is exactly how I saw things Kitso!Kitsondinho wrote:I said Walsall were the better team in the first half because we were shite until HRK scored. Walsall indeed had more of the balland created a few threats. At no point did I suggest they were dominating......just they were the better of the two teams playing during that section of the game. Once we went ahead, we were much better. During the 2nd half we were dominating them and could of scored 5 or 6.paultheroyal wrote:People see what they want to see...Jano wrote:Really struggling to see how people can say Walsall were the better team in the first half, they offered almost nothing going forward except for Sawyers. Admittedly we weren't great, but they were not worrying us at all.
They had a bit of possession and threatened which means they dominated clearly!!
It was pretty evens and cagey for first 20 or so and the second goal killed the game as a contest so attention turned to their fans!!
Think that's more an indication of a Sean O'Driscoll team as much as it is a standard League 1 team although he hasn't been there that long.windermere_royal wrote:If Walsall are typical of a top L1 side then the gulf in class from championship level is huge, plenty of pretty football but absolutely sod all up front.
.
Not sure what the stewards were actually doing. They had them penned into the entrance gangway by blocking them in front and back. They couldn't get into the stand or back into the concourse. Eventually they let them back into the concourse and as expected suddenly appeared in the wheelchair area where they had to stay. Probably pissed up but from what I could see if was all gesturing and nothing more. No different to what some of the mongs in Y26 were doing.Ian Royal wrote:I was wondering why they stayed penned up going nowhere, when all they had to do was disperse and go through one of the two or three other gates.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 11 guests