which is odd considering they managed a grand total of 6 shots on goal, and were a prob a poor refereeing decision away from only getting a point.genome wrote:I think it speaks volumes that Millwall fans are saying we're the worst side to play them, including League One last season.
The problem with 4 at the back, is that the full backs push up as if they were wing backs, and the centre backs split, leaving a gaping hole through the middle of our half. Either that or Joey / Kelly get sucked in and end up playing the entire game between our centre backs at our D rather than anywhere that they could be productive going forward.holsgrove breaks a leg wrote:As I had previously posted on the match thread, it's now not only the slow ponderous football and lack of goals that is an issue, it's an alarming lack of concentration and failure to keep a clean sheet. So basically everything needs addressing at this early stage. I simply cannot understand why he persists with wing backs when Blackett and Gunter are a million miles away from being effective in that position. It also means the outside forwards are too isolated up the pitch and find themselves farting about in the middle. Far better to have a 4-2-3-1 so the wide players can run onto or receive the ball on the wing and do their thing. If JVB and Edwards are a threatening centre mid pairing then I dread to think really. We have fashioned together a squad that don't really do goal scoring, from the midfielders to the attackers he has bought, many seem to be on 4-5 max for the season given their past form.
Swift and Kelly are the nearest to bagging a few goals but in Swift we have a player in serious decline and Kelly there is a weight of expectation. Talking of Swift, it does now look increasingly alarming that Gourlay and Tevredens apparent 'success' of getting players tied down on long contracts could well come back to bite them- both an ineffectual Gunter and a declining mcleary have also been given the same treatment. Of course extending Kelly and moored contract was a good thing given they clearly have promise but the others phffff.
Why was he wearing Joey's shirt for their winner?Ivanhoe wrote:Edwards scores then gets outjumped for the equaliser and turned for the winner, both by an ex team mate !
No improvement here.
It's not being mentioned for a reason. We didn't deserve a draw based on the performance and it's more the performances than the results that are agitating fans.John Smith wrote:Three pages slagging off the best manager we've had in years and no mention of the absolute stonewall penalty in the last minute! Did any of you actually go to the game last night?
Come on mate, you're usually one of the better posters on here but what you've just written is complete and utter drivel: "I don't care that we lost and I wouldn't have cared if we won" what the oxf*rd? Are you a supporter? We were robbed last night with the team he put out - end of.NewCorkSeth wrote:It's not being mentioned for a reason. We didn't deserve a draw based on the performance and it's more the performances than the results that are agitating fans.John Smith wrote:Three pages slagging off the best manager we've had in years and no mention of the absolute stonewall penalty in the last minute! Did any of you actually go to the game last night?
Yes we should have had a penalty but that would only have papered over the cracks (provided we scored it) and allowed Stam room to continue his decline. Something has to change tactically and the result against Millwall has nothing to do with it.
We play terrible football. Most nobbers wanted a line up change for this match desperately, we didn't get it and we lost because of it. I can't speak for everyone but I doubt I'm alone in saying that I don't care that we lost and I wouldn't have cared if we won. I care that a team with great potential is being mismanaged at the moment by someone I still have a lot of faith in. The fact that it's so obvious to the fans what the problem is makes the whole thing unnerving.
Possibly also missing our player of the season, Ali Al Habsi and our best (only?) goalscoring striker, Not that I'm knocking our current goalkeeper, but maybe AAH was keeping us in the game when we really didn't deserve to be. In which case we are weaker at the back and up front so less likely to score and more likely to concede, but it's okay as we've got loads of midfielders.Top Flight wrote:We may well be.RoyalBlue wrote:Are we missing Steven Reid's coaching input?
It isn't odd. Just because we won doesn't mean we didn't have an off night too.Hound wrote:which is odd considering they managed a grand total of 6 shots on goal, and were a prob a poor refereeing decision away from only getting a point.genome wrote:I think it speaks volumes that Millwall fans are saying we're the worst side to play them, including League One last season.
Its my ambivalence that has developed over the last few games. If we had won that game playing as poorly as we did it would only allow Stam to continue with the nonsense tactics hes been deploying.John Smith wrote:Come on mate, you're usually one of the better posters on here but what you've just written is complete and utter drivel: "I don't care that we lost and I wouldn't have cared if we won" what the oxf*rd? Are you a supporter? We were robbed last night with the team he put out - end of.NewCorkSeth wrote:It's not being mentioned for a reason. We didn't deserve a draw based on the performance and it's more the performances than the results that are agitating fans.John Smith wrote:Three pages slagging off the best manager we've had in years and no mention of the absolute stonewall penalty in the last minute! Did any of you actually go to the game last night?
Yes we should have had a penalty but that would only have papered over the cracks (provided we scored it) and allowed Stam room to continue his decline. Something has to change tactically and the result against Millwall has nothing to do with it.
We play terrible football. Most nobbers wanted a line up change for this match desperately, we didn't get it and we lost because of it. I can't speak for everyone but I doubt I'm alone in saying that I don't care that we lost and I wouldn't have cared if we won. I care that a team with great potential is being mismanaged at the moment by someone I still have a lot of faith in. The fact that it's so obvious to the fans what the problem is makes the whole thing unnerving.
Well possibly we just didn't allow you to play the game you wanted? Tired etc is just an excuse as you say, same as every other team in the division. Didn't you have something like 30 shots to 1 against Leeds? Did they honestly look better than our own version of shambles last night?Bunny1885 wrote:It isn't odd. Just because we won doesn't mean we didn't have an off night too.Hound wrote:which is odd considering they managed a grand total of 6 shots on goal, and were a prob a poor refereeing decision away from only getting a point.genome wrote:I think it speaks volumes that Millwall fans are saying we're the worst side to play them, including League One last season.
I think that's the point, that was probably our most lackluster performance of the season, but yet we came away with a win. That's football I guess - we played far better v Forest and Ipswich, yet lost those games.
Harris tries to always put out the same side, and we play a very high energy game. I think having to play two games back to back with 10 men, a high octane game against old foes Leeds and a tough trip to Preston in recent weeks has taken its toll. We looked tired.
Reading may have the same excuses, I don't know. But, I think it is fair to say that Reading are the poorest side we faced this season so far. And that includes Bolton, although that was only the second game in & they still probably had a bit of optimism and fight about them at that point.
I try not to think about the play off final for these reasons. It really was thrown away and to think we were just a couple of penalties away still fcuking kills me to think about.FiNeRaIn wrote:One of the saddest days in the history of the club. If we'd have had a go and lost, it would have been disappointing but that's how football goes. The fact we played one of the most negative game plans in the history of playoff finals will always leave a bitter taste in my mouth. We got exactly what we deserved.yuomi wrote:Let's get this straight, Stam choked at Wembley last season. I've dwelt a lot on what happened that day and I cannot get away from the fact that we didn't set ourselves up in any way to get a result that day.
I said on another thread that I watched Brighton vs Newcastle and it was amazing to see two teams basically sprinting up the pitch at each other in blistering attacks forward, balls whipped in every other minute. It was intense play, with a drive and a purpose. Compared to us against Hull.Gobsheik wrote:Is it any wonder that Dutch football is in decline with tactics like Stam's, (DeBoer at Palace was given the boot quickly). The football served up is all pretty and neat but is not what is needed in the Championship. We have no passion for the game. Where is the SPIRIT, TENACITY, FLAIR?
You didn't go then I take it.NewCorkSeth wrote: It's not being mentioned for a reason. We didn't deserve a draw based on the performance and it's more the performances than the results that are agitating fans.
I assume you mean in regards to Stam and how long he keeps his job? If so I really don't get this attitude of sacking managers so quickly. We had an amazing season last season, getting to a play off final against all odds.Warfield ED Stand wrote:Entire way we play was summed up when we broke in the 1st half with Beerens only having the right back to beat and he was away. He stopped, and passed it backwards. Playing 2 games running with no recognized striker is just clueless garbage. Time is running out.
That would be hard to qualify - because we were so good against Leeds. We weren't very good last night, yet it was still an even game. I think tiredness is a far enough excuse for us though - we have a small squad (no million pound players on our bench) and play a high octane game, and have to do that while dealing with a striker injury/suspension crisis. In fact it is fairer to say that Morison looked knackered, rather than whole team. Ideally Gregory would be beside him & Elliot could come on for him. And when Morison looks leggy then we are not as potent a threat as a team.Hound wrote:Well possibly we just didn't allow you to play the game you wanted? Tired etc is just an excuse as you say, same as every other team in the division. Didn't you have something like 30 shots to 1 against Leeds? Did they honestly look better than our own version of shambles last night?Bunny1885 wrote:It isn't odd. Just because we won doesn't mean we didn't have an off night too.Hound wrote:
which is odd considering they managed a grand total of 6 shots on goal, and were a prob a poor refereeing decision away from only getting a point.
I think that's the point, that was probably our most lackluster performance of the season, but yet we came away with a win. That's football I guess - we played far better v Forest and Ipswich, yet lost those games.
Harris tries to always put out the same side, and we play a very high energy game. I think having to play two games back to back with 10 men, a high octane game against old foes Leeds and a tough trip to Preston in recent weeks has taken its toll. We looked tired.
Reading may have the same excuses, I don't know. But, I think it is fair to say that Reading are the poorest side we faced this season so far. And that includes Bolton, although that was only the second game in & they still probably had a bit of optimism and fight about them at that point.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Richard and 1123 guests