Dropped 5 clangers, costly mistakes, got lucky = not very good (in your eyes)Snowflake Royal wrote:I didn’t actually say he was shit. I was surprised he was being praised.Coppells Lost Coat wrote:I echo this.paultheroyal wrote:
I am coming in here to say, utter bollocks.
When you have an angst against a player you just do t let up. Like that school bully. Southwood dropped and off you squeal. Hein was excellent last night, in goal to co tribute for our first clean sheet in yonks. He was strong and made a number of class saves and attempted to clear and command his box. Save in first half was outstanding. Just give it up, for gods sake. Pathetic.
I was not in favour of dropping Southwood, but i am not going to say Hein was shit because of it. Clean sheet. A few brave moments and claiming well - also flapped at some but that was all that he could have done. The elements were there for a clanger to happen.
However I will say as I have done a few times - Heins kicking is awful wind or no wind.
Not sure about that. Estonia's climate is subject to frequent cyclones and winter temperatures down to minus 20 degrees.Jackson Corner wrote:Anyone Who has ever played in goal will know last night‘s conditions were the most difficult for a goalkeeper. Considering the amount of pressure the young lad was put under I thought he did okay. Granted is kicking was poor but again that was mainly down to the strong wind. At 19 he deserves some credit the Peterborough keeper was a lot more experienced And would’ve been more accustomed to those conditions.
Don't you mean ARTIC circle?Norfolk Royal wrote:Not sure about that. Estonia's climate is subject to frequent cyclones and winter temperatures down to minus 20 degrees.Jackson Corner wrote:Anyone Who has ever played in goal will know last night‘s conditions were the most difficult for a goalkeeper. Considering the amount of pressure the young lad was put under I thought he did okay. Granted is kicking was poor but again that was mainly down to the strong wind. At 19 he deserves some credit the Peterborough keeper was a lot more experienced And would’ve been more accustomed to those conditions.
Unless the Peterborough goalkeeper has played most of his football in the Arctic circle of course.
He is from Norfolk, cut him some slack please.Millsy wrote:Don't you mean ARTIC circle?Norfolk Royal wrote:Not sure about that. Estonia's climate is subject to frequent cyclones and winter temperatures down to minus 20 degrees.Jackson Corner wrote:Anyone Who has ever played in goal will know last night‘s conditions were the most difficult for a goalkeeper. Considering the amount of pressure the young lad was put under I thought he did okay. Granted is kicking was poor but again that was mainly down to the strong wind. At 19 he deserves some credit the Peterborough keeper was a lot more experienced And would’ve been more accustomed to those conditions.
Unless the Peterborough goalkeeper has played most of his football in the Arctic circle of course.
(for any watchers of The Apprentice)
In the East End that would mean a circle of articulated lorries.Millsy wrote:Don't you mean ARTIC circle?Norfolk Royal wrote:Not sure about that. Estonia's climate is subject to frequent cyclones and winter temperatures down to minus 20 degrees.Jackson Corner wrote:Anyone Who has ever played in goal will know last night‘s conditions were the most difficult for a goalkeeper. Considering the amount of pressure the young lad was put under I thought he did okay. Granted is kicking was poor but again that was mainly down to the strong wind. At 19 he deserves some credit the Peterborough keeper was a lot more experienced And would’ve been more accustomed to those conditions.
Unless the Peterborough goalkeeper has played most of his football in the Arctic circle of course.
(for any watchers of The Apprentice)
Prem=1st divNathStPaul wrote:What is a 3rd division game?
You apparently still live in the 1970's. Guess that explains your questionable views on all race related issues.South Coast Royal wrote:Prem=1st divNathStPaul wrote:What is a 3rd division game?
Champ=2nd div
League 1=3rd div
League 2=4th div
Nath=div.
NathStPaul wrote:You apparently still live in the 1970's. Guess that explains your questionable views on all race related issues.South Coast Royal wrote:Prem=1st divNathStPaul wrote:What is a 3rd division game?
Champ=2nd div
League 1=3rd div
League 2=4th div
Nath=div.
LolSouth Coast Royal wrote:Prem=1st divNathStPaul wrote:What is a 3rd division game?
Champ=2nd div
League 1=3rd div
League 2=4th div
Nath=div.
Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?Snowflake Royal wrote:I can see why you were a ref. Visually impaired and stupid.paultheroyal wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote: Nice sig.
That clean sheet was mainly thanks to Morrison and Peterborough's finishing inadequacy. They could have comfortably had 4.
Flapped at a header across him, Morro saves his skin on the line.
Came miles out and passed straight to a Posh player in 10 yards of space leaving the goal gaping.
Did a superman impression on a cross he got nowhere near leaving the goal gaping.
I forget the other.
We could comfortably had 2 - whats your point?
Thats Morro's job to do that, and that he did. You are absolutely clutching at straws to assassinate someone as it does not fit your agenda. Its pathetic. Because of Hein we got a point. End of.
Changed in the 90s m8NathStPaul wrote:You apparently still live in the 1970's. Guess that explains your questionable views on all race related issues.South Coast Royal wrote:Prem=1st divNathStPaul wrote:What is a 3rd division game?
Champ=2nd div
League 1=3rd div
League 2=4th div
Nath=div.
Tell Alf Garnett over there, he apparently isn't aware.Snowflake Royal wrote:Changed in the 90s m8NathStPaul wrote:You apparently still live in the 1970's. Guess that explains your questionable views on all race related issues.South Coast Royal wrote:
Prem=1st div
Champ=2nd div
League 1=3rd div
League 2=4th div
Nath=div.
For somebody who posts so much on here you don't seem to understand the structure of English football, i.e. it is divided (as in division) into 4 leagues ranging from 1-4.NathStPaul wrote:Tell Alf Garnett over there, he apparently isn't aware.Snowflake Royal wrote:Changed in the 90s m8NathStPaul wrote: You apparently still live in the 1970's. Guess that explains your questionable views on all race related issues.
Hein 5 - lots of mistakes, lucky not to be punished, poor kicking but rather he kicked it out than tried to pass out with a high press. Some good saves.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?Snowflake Royal wrote:I can see why you were a ref. Visually impaired and stupid.paultheroyal wrote:
We could comfortably had 2 - whats your point?
Thats Morro's job to do that, and that he did. You are absolutely clutching at straws to assassinate someone as it does not fit your agenda. Its pathetic. Because of Hein we got a point. End of.
Wouldn't argue too much with those Ian.Snowflake Royal wrote:Hein 5 - lots of mistakes, lucky not to be punished, poor kicking but rather he kicked it out than tried to pass out with a high press. Some good saves.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?Snowflake Royal wrote: I can see why you were a ref. Visually impaired and stupid.
Yiadom - 6 poor crossing, but put in a shift. Brownie points for speaking to fans
Rahman - 5 some nice some awful
Morrison - 6 some poor moments more than made up for by two goal line clearances
Holmes - 6 consistently ok ish
Rinomhota - 6 some hard work and good moments (burst through for the fk) but more mistakes than normal
Drinkwater - 5 best game in a while. Made some good tackles, chased hard sometimes. Still awol plenty and some really basic mistakes
Swift - 4 slow, didn't create, should have done much better with his chance
Ince - 5 didn’t really cope with the conditions, ok freekick... got it on target but not going to beat a keeper with it
Meite 5 this may seem harsh, because to start with he brings a complete different level of effort and positivity, but he quickly faded out of the game. Not even remotely ready to start IMO
Joao - 5 should have scored, although he made that on his own so ... like Swift, trying things you do on a run of wins at 2 up, not on a run of losses at 0-0. He's quality, but you can’t see him out there expecting to score and win, head drops quite quickly
Bashiru - 6 taken out when breaking through, otherwise not a lot
Happy?
I'd normally be looking at a 3 or a 4 for DD.South Coast Royal wrote:Wouldn't argue too much with those Ian.Snowflake Royal wrote:Hein 5 - lots of mistakes, lucky not to be punished, poor kicking but rather he kicked it out than tried to pass out with a high press. Some good saves.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?
Yiadom - 6 poor crossing, but put in a shift. Brownie points for speaking to fans
Rahman - 5 some nice some awful
Morrison - 6 some poor moments more than made up for by two goal line clearances
Holmes - 6 consistently ok ish
Rinomhota - 6 some hard work and good moments (burst through for the fk) but more mistakes than normal
Drinkwater - 5 best game in a while. Made some good tackles, chased hard sometimes. Still awol plenty and some really basic mistakes
Swift - 4 slow, didn't create, should have done much better with his chance
Ince - 5 didn’t really cope with the conditions, ok freekick... got it on target but not going to beat a keeper with it
Meite 5 this may seem harsh, because to start with he brings a complete different level of effort and positivity, but he quickly faded out of the game. Not even remotely ready to start IMO
Joao - 5 should have scored, although he made that on his own so ... like Swift, trying things you do on a run of wins at 2 up, not on a run of losses at 0-0. He's quality, but you can’t see him out there expecting to score and win, head drops quite quickly
Bashiru - 6 taken out when breaking through, otherwise not a lot
Happy?
I am not normally a Drinkwater basher but I thought, for a player once good enough to play at the top level , his passing both in terms of weight and direction was generally that of a Div 4player.
Snowflake Royal wrote:Hein 5 - lots of mistakes, lucky not to be punished, poor kicking but rather he kicked it out than tried to pass out with a high press. Some good saves.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?Snowflake Royal wrote: I can see why you were a ref. Visually impaired and stupid.
Yiadom - 6 poor crossing, but put in a shift. Brownie points for speaking to fans
Rahman - 5 some nice some awful
Morrison - 6 some poor moments more than made up for by two goal line clearances
Holmes - 6 consistently ok ish
Rinomhota - 6 some hard work and good moments (burst through for the fk) but more mistakes than normal
Drinkwater - 5 best game in a while. Made some good tackles, chased hard sometimes. Still awol plenty and some really basic mistakes
Swift - 4 slow, didn't create, should have done much better with his chance
Ince - 5 didn’t really cope with the conditions, ok freekick... got it on target but not going to beat a keeper with it
Meite 5 this may seem harsh, because to start with he brings a complete different level of effort and positivity, but he quickly faded out of the game. Not even remotely ready to start IMO
Joao - 5 should have scored, although he made that on his own so ... like Swift, trying things you do on a run of wins at 2 up, not on a run of losses at 0-0. He's quality, but you can’t see him out there expecting to score and win, head drops quite quickly
Bashiru - 6 taken out when breaking through, otherwise not a lot
Happy?
Agree with most of the above - would give Hein a little more credit due to conditions.Snowflake Royal wrote:Hein 5 - lots of mistakes, lucky not to be punished, poor kicking but rather he kicked it out than tried to pass out with a high press. Some good saves.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Just to clarify; after a 0:0 away draw its the keeper who you're highlighting as being poor?Snowflake Royal wrote: I can see why you were a ref. Visually impaired and stupid.
Yiadom - 6 poor crossing, but put in a shift. Brownie points for speaking to fans
Rahman - 5 some nice some awful
Morrison - 6 some poor moments more than made up for by two goal line clearances
Holmes - 6 consistently ok ish
Rinomhota - 6 some hard work and good moments (burst through for the fk) but more mistakes than normal
Drinkwater - 5 best game in a while. Made some good tackles, chased hard sometimes. Still awol plenty and some really basic mistakes
Swift - 4 slow, didn't create, should have done much better with his chance
Ince - 5 didn’t really cope with the conditions, ok freekick... got it on target but not going to beat a keeper with it
Meite 5 this may seem harsh, because to start with he brings a complete different level of effort and positivity, but he quickly faded out of the game. Not even remotely ready to start IMO
Joao - 5 should have scored, although he made that on his own so ... like Swift, trying things you do on a run of wins at 2 up, not on a run of losses at 0-0. He's quality, but you can’t see him out there expecting to score and win, head drops quite quickly
Bashiru - 6 taken out when breaking through, otherwise not a lot
Happy?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Royals and Racers and 265 guests