You suggesting he could afford to trade up nowRoyalBlue wrote:On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
You suggesting he could afford to trade up nowRoyalBlue wrote:On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.M4 Junction 11 wrote:You suggesting he could afford to trade up nowRoyalBlue wrote:On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
readingbedding wrote:Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.M4 Junction 11 wrote:You suggesting he could afford to trade up nowRoyalBlue wrote:On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!

My god! To think I'm described as cynical!readingbedding wrote:Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.M4 Junction 11 wrote:You suggesting he could afford to trade up nowRoyalBlue wrote:On the other hand it might not! I suspect they were together some time before he became a Premiership star. He certainly wouldn't have been getting £8K a week at Brentford!
It's the truth.RoyalBlue wrote:My god! To think I'm described as cynical!readingbedding wrote:Whatever, she wouldn't be there if he was working as a bin man.M4 Junction 11 wrote: You suggesting he could afford to trade up now
Couldn't agree with you more, money may seem important but if you do not like the person you are married I don't think even Beckham's money would be enough.Royal Lady wrote:How do you know it's the truth. Do you think she might have been attracted to him as a person, rather than his job?
westendgirl wrote:Couldn't agree with you more, money may seem important but if you do not like the person you are married I don't think even Beckham's money would be enough.Royal Lady wrote:How do you know it's the truth. Do you think she might have been attracted to him as a person, rather than his job?
It is interesting now many of the WAGs have been with their respectives for much longer than the recent success, but then why let a little fact like that get in the way of cynicism (or jealousy?).
You read it wrong - the discussion was about Ivar and his wife.The 17 Bus wrote:I thought it was meant that Mrs Sidders would not be on the programme if Sidders was a binman, not that she is only with him cos of his job, or did i read it wrong?
I genuinely didn't know she was doing that!!!Harold wrote:so it's not a celebrity reality tv show then?Royal Lady wrote:Spot on Mr A, except for Krystall Sidwell soon to be appearing in a celebrity reality TV show!Mr Angry wrote:What a surprise, the efforts of the wags of our team are being slagged off by supporters of, er....Man Utd, Liverpool and Chelsea.
![]()
I guess the fact that they aren't spending £100K a month on designer tat, or posing for lads mags or being invited onto the latest "celebrity" TV reality programme shows that we are still a little club.
Fair play to The Royal Families, they are raising money from the community to give to local worthy causes, and I, for one, will continue to support them.
As was once said, a cynic is someone who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 46 guests