they can't sing in time or the same song as it now, so it can't make things worse.Farnborough Royal wrote:the thing that worries me is when there are two tiers the songs get out of time. this is what happened at loads of away games this season, chelsea and man city spring to mind
What second tier? It'll remain a one tier stand!Farnborough Royal wrote:the thing that worries me is when there are two tiers the songs get out of time. this is what happened at loads of away games this season, chelsea and man city spring to mind
Just think though,the increase in complaints over our behaviour because of the corporate knobs not tolerating usRoyal Lady wrote:I thought that area was going to be the new disabled area. Anyway, we're Row W!!! Cheerio you miserable barstewards who sit directly behind us!!!
RFCMod wrote:Just think though,the increase in complaints over our behaviour because of the corporate knobs not tolerating usRoyal Lady wrote:I thought that area was going to be the new disabled area. Anyway, we're Row W!!! Cheerio you miserable barstewards who sit directly behind us!!!
I don't feel so sorry for all those that will lose their seats now if there's somewhere more comfortable for the rest of us to go get a drinkDirk Gently wrote:You're all assuming that this "hospitality area" will take the form of Executive Boxes like those on the West side.
But as I understand them this is actually an area for East Stand ST holders (i.e. home fans only) to pay a little extra and have access to a nicer area than the concourses (e.g. bar area, carpet on the floor, view of the pitch etc).
But definitely not Exec boxes where potentially away fans might be.
Yes there was a more controlled row of season ticket holders on SaturdayRoyal Lady wrote:RFCMod wrote:Just think though,the increase in complaints over our behaviour because of the corporate knobs not tolerating usRoyal Lady wrote:I thought that area was going to be the new disabled area. Anyway, we're Row W!!! Cheerio you miserable barstewards who sit directly behind us!!!Hooligan's brother seemed very well controlled.
Of course it is if not why have it?RoyalBlue wrote:I'd be interested in knowing how much the club believe they make per square foot of corporate hospitality compared to that they get from each square foot of ordinary supporter seating.
I wonder whether the difference in income per square foot is as much as people might assume.
Nice to see STAR have stuck true to form and decided to back the club rather than the supporters..STAR Campaigns wrote:Not really the topic for a Fans' Forum - it's not something that SC will want to comment on tonight, for instance.
But see http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60152 for STAR's line on this.
Nothing to stop you standing for election to the STAR board if you want to try and change things.bigmike wrote:Nice to see STAR have stuck true to form and decided to back the club rather than the supporters..STAR Campaigns wrote:Not really the topic for a Fans' Forum - it's not something that SC will want to comment on tonight, for instance.
But see http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60152 for STAR's line on this.
I hate to say it but in my opinion STAR reeks of I am in it for the kudos.
Now I know that not everyone that is involved with STAR is in it for themselves it certainly seems like it.
And now you're re-writing history. The West (Upper and Lower) have always been reserved, and the North was reserved before the East was. In fact, IIRC, the North was only made unreserved when the East was made reserved, because the club wanted to encourage the singers to move to the North stand.bigmike wrote:Why place the hospitality in the stand that due to demand was the first one in the ground that had inforced reserved seating.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests