Yeah i agree but did include those in my squad (previous page) - you just have to have someone like Defoe in the squad for the simple fact if Rooney gets injured you need a "similar" replacementpapereyes wrote:I wasn't sure of the significance of 39 appearances - so, imo, 6 seasons gave a better indication of how long he'd been buzzing around the squad. Wiki also rather helpfully adds that 8 of those goals came as pairs, suggesting he fills his boots when he gets the chance.
I can't see it being Agbonlahor now, he's had his chance.
If there's a surplus of decent wide attacking midfielders, then drop the striker and send along someone who can play in a number of positions. Walcott, Milner etc.
Agree with urz, with the current system of seeded qualifiers how often do we play competitive games against the best in the world? Even in the group stages of the EC and WC you generally get a bad team or two.cmonurz wrote:Macedonia 1
Liechenstein 1
Denmark 2
Iceland 2
Switzerland 2
Croatia 4
Argentina 1
Holland 1
Estonia 1
Russia 1
Kazakhstan 3
Belarus 2
Slovakia 2
Andorra 2
I've never really liked that argument. ^^ That's Rooney's international goals. Argies and Holland were friendlies, which just leaves Croatia for a significant team really.
Russia was a competitive game in a group that Russia qualified from at the expense of Englandcmonurz wrote:Macedonia 1
Liechenstein 1
Denmark 2
Iceland 2
Switzerland 2
Croatia 4
Argentina 1
Holland 1
Estonia 1
Russia 1
Kazakhstan 3
Belarus 2
Slovakia 2
Andorra 2
I've never really liked that argument. ^^ That's Rooney's international goals. Argies and Holland were friendlies, which just leaves Croatia for a significant team really.
RoyalChicagoFC wrote:Fair do's --just a spot of fun
Why the consensus thumbs down on Gabby, I wonder

Even if you're one of the swiftly dwindling group that still fails to appreciate what Heskey does you must surely be aware that he is not only going to South Africa but that he'll be starting the first game?Thomas L'Heureux wrote:Better option than Heskey to be honest mate. Why have you included him in your squad? Because "Rooney likes playing with him"?TBM wrote:Would you have CarLOLton CoLOLe instead then?papereyes wrote:If England take Defoe, then they may as well give up at the QF stage. The very definition of flat track bully.
The bloke has scored something like six goals in sixty internationals. For a centre-forward of any standard, that is truly awful.
If you mean did I boo him in the FA Cup game, then no, I didn't. I think Heskey is a fairly solid Premiership footballer but nothing more than that. His goal scoring record is particularly poor for a centre-forward, and no matter how much work you do across the pitch, that's ultimately what you'll be judged on when playing in that position and anyone trying to argue otherwise is deluded.Silver Fox wrote:Even if you're one of the swiftly dwindling group that still fails to appreciate what Heskey does you must surely be aware that he is not only going to South Africa but that he'll be starting the first game?Thomas L'Heureux wrote:Better option than Heskey to be honest mate. Why have you included him in your squad? Because "Rooney likes playing with him"?TBM wrote:Would you have CarLOLton CoLOLe instead then?
The bloke has scored something like six goals in sixty internationals. For a centre-forward of any standard, that is truly awful.
FWIW why has Darren Bent been forgotten as the 4th striker? He can't do any worse than Defoe and the truth is that it's going to be Rooney and Heskey (or Crouch) and if the spud faced nipper isn't playing England won't do very well, whoever replaces him
I bet Gareth Bale does.frimmers3 wrote:i bet a few wish gareth bale was english....
You had me right theresoggy biscuit wrote:LOLZ @ Spurs fans
Why?frimmers3 wrote:i bet a few wish gareth bale was english....
Sheep, mostly.frimmers3 wrote:i bet a few wish gareth bale was english....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests