3 defeats in 55 games.RG30 wrote:Lee Clark leaves Huddersfield reports Sky Sports
3 defeats in 55 games.RG30 wrote:Lee Clark leaves Huddersfield reports Sky Sports
by winchester_royal » 15 Feb 2012 14:21
15 Feb 2012 14:21by Barry the bird boggler » 15 Feb 2012 14:31
15 Feb 2012 14:31by Alan Partridge » 15 Feb 2012 14:37
15 Feb 2012 14:37LOADS of draws, 1 man team, massive budget and nothing to show for it. Those are the harsh facts.winchester_royal wrote:The scary thing is that the Huddersfield fans are celebrating the decision.
by winchester_royal » 15 Feb 2012 14:45
15 Feb 2012 14:45Fair enough, but they're 4th in the league, and the 3 teams above them have all been in the Premiership in the last 12 years.Alan Partridge wrote:LOADS of draws, 1 man team, massive budget and nothing to show for it. Those are the harsh facts.winchester_royal wrote:The scary thing is that the Huddersfield fans are celebrating the decision.
i am shocked by this still naturally and I do think it's a bit mental but the bloke is more overr8d than Fat Frank.
by Silver Fox » 15 Feb 2012 14:53
15 Feb 2012 14:53by Alan Partridge » 15 Feb 2012 14:54
15 Feb 2012 14:54by winchester_royal » 15 Feb 2012 15:02
15 Feb 2012 15:02Sounds a bit like our Brendan in that respect I suppose. Fans would have been a lot more forgiving during his first few months had he shown a bit more humility.Alan Partridge wrote:Like I said I still find it strange but he's a funny character. Not likeable and whilst that's not the be all and end all it bides you time sometimes. He's a sort of person i can see clashing with people, fans, players, board. He's spent a lot of money for that level, despite all the 'unbeaten run' stuff they still haven't won promotion. you'd have thought going unbeaten for 40 odd games you'd be either up or like Charlton top by miles but they draw loads.
i think the majority of their fan reaction is they are happy about this, I'm not that surprised to be honest.
by winchester_royal » 15 Feb 2012 15:04
15 Feb 2012 15:04I'd have thought getting dismissed for poor performance when your team is 4th in the league could be deemed as unfair.Silver Fox wrote:How do you get unfairly dismissed as a football manager? I can only think of that being possible if they alleged some sort of gross misconduct that you disputed
by Silver Fox » 15 Feb 2012 15:09
15 Feb 2012 15:09by Jerry St Clair » 15 Feb 2012 15:29
15 Feb 2012 15:29Was rather hoping you'd be on here calling for Ling's head today. Sadly, Cheltenham managed to put in an even more inept display against the Gulls last night than they did against Hereford at the weekend. The natives were extremely restless in the Skip by the end last night - I don't think it'll be too long before they want Yates's head on a pole.Alan Partridge wrote: i think the majority of their fan reaction is they are happy about this, I'm not that surprised to be honest.
by Terminal Boardom » 15 Feb 2012 16:35
15 Feb 2012 16:35Fail. Epic FAIL!!! Fans would have been more forgiving had the results and performances been so much better than they were. His BS was purely his way of covering up the squad's deficiences.winchester_royal wrote:Sounds a bit like our Brendan in that respect I suppose. Fans would have been a lot more forgiving during his first few months had he shown a bit more humility.Alan Partridge wrote:Like I said I still find it strange but he's a funny character. Not likeable and whilst that's not the be all and end all it bides you time sometimes. He's a sort of person i can see clashing with people, fans, players, board. He's spent a lot of money for that level, despite all the 'unbeaten run' stuff they still haven't won promotion. you'd have thought going unbeaten for 40 odd games you'd be either up or like Charlton top by miles but they draw loads.
i think the majority of their fan reaction is they are happy about this, I'm not that surprised to be honest.
by winchester_royal » 15 Feb 2012 16:41
15 Feb 2012 16:41Disagree.Terminal Boardom wrote:Fail. Epic FAIL!!! Fans would have been more forgiving had the results and performances been so much better than they were. His BS was purely his way of covering up the squad's deficiences.winchester_royal wrote:Sounds a bit like our Brendan in that respect I suppose. Fans would have been a lot more forgiving during his first few months had he shown a bit more humility.Alan Partridge wrote:Like I said I still find it strange but he's a funny character. Not likeable and whilst that's not the be all and end all it bides you time sometimes. He's a sort of person i can see clashing with people, fans, players, board. He's spent a lot of money for that level, despite all the 'unbeaten run' stuff they still haven't won promotion. you'd have thought going unbeaten for 40 odd games you'd be either up or like Charlton top by miles but they draw loads.
i think the majority of their fan reaction is they are happy about this, I'm not that surprised to be honest.
by Alan Partridge » 15 Feb 2012 16:58
15 Feb 2012 16:58That would be mental, Cheltenham and Torquay should be about 20th and 21st in the league. In terms of football that was the 2nd worst I've seen us play this year but we've won both of those games 1-0. So happy days.Jerry St Clair wrote:Was rather hoping you'd be on here calling for Ling's head today. Sadly, Cheltenham managed to put in an even more inept display against the Gulls last night than they did against Hereford at the weekend. The natives were extremely restless in the Skip by the end last night - I don't think it'll be too long before they want Yates's head on a pole.Alan Partridge wrote: i think the majority of their fan reaction is they are happy about this, I'm not that surprised to be honest.
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Feb 2012 18:08
15 Feb 2012 18:08by Royal Rother » 15 Feb 2012 18:57
15 Feb 2012 18:57Met him have you? He is actually a thoroughly decent and likeable bloke and your comment suggests you are a bit of a prick.winchester_royal wrote: Disagree.
Though we weren't fantastic by any means under Rodgers things were starting to pick up. He was disliked by most of the supporters (IMO) not because of how the team was playing, but because of his arrogant interviews, big watch, and constant name-dropping.
Indeed he was sacked not because of results, but because of him being a complete prick.
by soggy biscuit » 15 Feb 2012 19:01
15 Feb 2012 19:01Lesson learnt for me & many others I guess. Don't judge how a football club is going by league position and the odd minor headline. Their fans couldn't be happier that he is gone.winchester_royal wrote:The scary thing is that the Huddersfield fans are celebrating the decision.
by Jerry St Clair » 15 Feb 2012 21:07
15 Feb 2012 21:07Indeed, an appalling game. Luckily Crawley have been on a similar run so that's rather saved our bacon. We have some eminently winnable games coming up, so should get back on track. I can't help thinking it'll be the play-offs for the Robins, though.Alan Partridge wrote:That would be mental, Cheltenham and Torquay should be about 20th and 21st in the league. In terms of football that was the 2nd worst I've seen us play this year but we've won both of those games 1-0. So happy days.Jerry St Clair wrote:Was rather hoping you'd be on here calling for Ling's head today. Sadly, Cheltenham managed to put in an even more inept display against the Gulls last night than they did against Hereford at the weekend. The natives were extremely restless in the Skip by the end last night - I don't think it'll be too long before they want Yates's head on a pole.Alan Partridge wrote: i think the majority of their fan reaction is they are happy about this, I'm not that surprised to be honest.
by Royal Rother » 15 Feb 2012 21:16
15 Feb 2012 21:16Why was he so unpopular with some fans?soggy biscuit wrote:Lesson learnt for me & many others I guess. Don't judge how a football club is going by league position and the odd minor headline. Their fans couldn't be happier that he is gone.winchester_royal wrote:The scary thing is that the Huddersfield fans are celebrating the decision.
by winchester_royal » 15 Feb 2012 23:22
15 Feb 2012 23:22No but I know people inside the club who he managed to completely alienate, hence why they were all so eager to get shot of him. I believe Dirk can corroborate this particular 'story'.Royal Rother wrote:Met him have you? He is actually a thoroughly decent and likeable bloke and your comment suggests you are a bit of a prick.winchester_royal wrote: Disagree.
Though we weren't fantastic by any means under Rodgers things were starting to pick up. He was disliked by most of the supporters (IMO) not because of how the team was playing, but because of his arrogant interviews, big watch, and constant name-dropping.
Indeed he was sacked not because of results, but because of him being a complete prick.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests