We're ManchesteROFL United, we do what we want
-
Royal Rother
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
- Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes
-
Old Man Andrews
Royal Rother wrote:
They are all existing players some of which are on huge salaries and are also crap. United's transfer policy has clearly changed, they buy young players with potential but do not offer huge wages.
United refused to pay a 19 year old £150k a week, a simple search will find you that information.
-
Royal Rother
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
- Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes
I might be wrong but I thought Maguire and Wan Bissaka were their 2 most recent signings.
-
Old Man Andrews
Royal Rother wrote:I might be wrong but I thought Maguire and Wan Bissaka were their 2 most recent signings.
Maguire is a 27 year old England centre back and proven. He was also very much needed as their defence was/is shot. They had to pay up.
Wan Bissaka is on more or less what United offered Haaland.
You can see by the haggling they are doing over the Fernandes fee and their complete lack of activity this January that either there is very little or no money available or they are stitching Ole up deliberately so they can justify sacking him. It's a very weird situation at the club, one of the richest in world football but are living like paupers.
-
Royal Rother
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
- Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes
Sorry, I thought you said they only buy young players and don’t offer huge wages.
Oh look, you did!
You like facts. Let’s review the real facts shall we? Last 2 signings are Maguire, not young, on £190k pw. HUGE wages. Especially for a defender.
And Wan Bissaka, who is indeed young, but on £120k pw. HUGE wages. Especially for a young defender.
I don’t think it’s me who’s losing, do you?
You’re out of your depth trying to take me on.
Run along, I’m bored now.
Oh look, you did!
Old Man Andrews wrote:. United's transfer policy has clearly changed, they buy young players with potential but do not offer huge wages.
You like facts. Let’s review the real facts shall we? Last 2 signings are Maguire, not young, on £190k pw. HUGE wages. Especially for a defender.
And Wan Bissaka, who is indeed young, but on £120k pw. HUGE wages. Especially for a young defender.
I don’t think it’s me who’s losing, do you?
You’re out of your depth trying to take me on.
Run along, I’m bored now.
-
Old Man Andrews
Royal Rother wrote:Sorry, I thought you said they only buy young players and don’t offer huge wages.
Oh look, you did!Old Man Andrews wrote:. United's transfer policy has clearly changed, they buy young players with potential but do not offer huge wages.
You like facts. Let’s review the real facts shall we? Last 2 signings are Maguire, not young, on £190k pw. HUGE wages. Especially for a defender.
And Wan Bissaka, who is indeed young, but on £120k pw. HUGE wages. Especially for a young defender.
I don’t think it’s me who’s losing, do you?
You’re out of your depth trying to take me on.
Run along, I’m bored now.
Yes it has changed. As in changed now hence their approach for very young players of potential. They undervalued Haaland, he rightly held out for what he is worth. They bought Maguire because they didn't have much choice last summer. Haaland is a striker of potential and they already have Rashford, Martial, Greenwood who can play up top. Possibly they thought Haaland wouldn't be first choice so didn't want to part with 150k a week.
Wan Bissaka is on £90k a week according to the fraudulent document you've produced and not 120k as you just stated. It would help if you could read properly, it would help your point. 90k is about what Haaland was offered.
Stick to Windsor, that's your level. Bargain basement and going nowhere.
-
Winston Biscuit
- Hob Nob Legend
- Posts: 41380
- Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
- Location: Vote Biscuit
Genuinely thinking..."surely we can beat Tranmere??!!"
-
AthleticoSpizz
- Hob Nob Legend
- Posts: 26037
- Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
- Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park
-
Old Man Andrews
Old Man Andrews wrote:They are scumbags. Entitled, thick scumbags.
The depressing thing is there are loads of United fans defending it.
-
Old Man Andrews
genome wrote:Old Man Andrews wrote:They are scumbags. Entitled, thick scumbags.
The depressing thing is there are loads of United fans defending it.
Yep seen that this morning. The seem to be saying "Yeah the supporters went too far but......". There is no "but", the bloke has two young kids ffs.
-
Silver Fox
- Hob Nob Legend
- Posts: 27190
- Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
- Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies
Silver Fox wrote:I blame Ken Loach
lols...I watched that at the weekend
Masterful tactics from Ole...bore City to death and then get a set-piece
Lingard loses it for the 50th time
Ole “one more time Jesse and you’re off”
Two minutes later, Lingard loses it. Is then subbed off
What a waste of a shirt he is
Ole “one more time Jesse and you’re off”
Two minutes later, Lingard loses it. Is then subbed off
What a waste of a shirt he is
-
Old Man Andrews
Yeah Lingard is such an Everton player. The definition of that is a player who has been at an elite club for years, never did anything of note for them but still gets a big money move. See Theo Walcott.
I seem to remember him having a purple patch a couple of years ago where he scored a few games in a row, but has gone well off the boil since then.
Didn't realise he was 27, thought he was a few years younger than that.
Didn't realise he was 27, thought he was a few years younger than that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests
It is currently 18 Mar 2026 21:55