Don't disagree !Hoop Blah wrote:
At the end of the day Puma and the Club presumably pay quite a bit of money to pick out the right shirt so why not try and match it up to what the fans want (even if that means the current fan base want a tin pot one like this effort).
WTF do you know? This shirt is a million times better than the old gay sailor-boy nonsense we had last season. There would be ripped arseholes a-plenty if that shirt was worn in numbers when we go to Pompey.Ark Royal wrote:As somebody else alluded to earlier, I thought it was just bad resolution on my monitor when I first saw it. More repulsive than the last one and that took some doing.
The. Worst. Kit. Ever.
What's more telling are the launch dates of Morton's kits yet they still allow the punter to see what it is before the launch. Why the secrecy? Is the club afraid that there will be an army of thousands making knock-off replicas?X210 wrote:How can Puma design a decent hoop shirt for Greenock Morton and not us?
http://www.themortonshop.com/
This might be a matter of personal taste but how can you reconcile the 'street art' style hoops that look like something found in the skip round the back of the design office of 2012 Olympics? I admit the shirt itself looks good if it wasn't for that ridiculous feature.Barry the bird boggler wrote:The new kit is far and away the best kit since the kits we had in 2005/2006. Certainly it's vast improvement of the monstrosities we've had in the last couple of years.
And it does make a small amount of difference players, if you have a smart looking kit you'll feel a little bit more pride about the job in hand. OK it won't turn also rans into world beaters but it could add a bit to some player's mind sets.
This season though that isn't the case though is it? If it was we'd have the same kit as the other Puma hooped shirts but instead we have this ropey old number.Sun Tzu wrote:There usually isn't much choice, given we just have a colour variant on whatever the standard template is for the season.
The kit revealed today is a vast improvement of the dreadful cr*p we've had in the last two seasons. Yes it could be better, the hoops could be properly coloured in for example, but overall it is a step in the right direction.Ark Royal wrote:As somebody else alluded to earlier, I thought it was just bad resolution on my monitor when I first saw it. More repulsive than the last one and that took some doing.
The. Worst. Kit. Ever.
I suspect we may be better reserving judgement a little until we've actually seen the kit though....Hoop Blah wrote:This season though that isn't the case though is it? If it was we'd have the same kit as the other Puma hooped shirts but instead we have this ropey old number.Sun Tzu wrote:There usually isn't much choice, given we just have a colour variant on whatever the standard template is for the season.
How can QPR consistently turn out a worse football team than us, despite spending so much more on players ?floyd__streete wrote:The blue hoops look like they have been drawn on freehand. All blue back to the home shirt. Blue shorts. A relegation kit if ever there was one. How can QPR can consistently turn out smarter looking blue and white hooped kits?
Users browsing this forum: RG30 and 69 guests