Perhaps they should comply with the law, then.royalgrumpy wrote:By picking out two fans standing amongst a group of 40 in the front rows, and ignoring the several hundred stoop behind them?!
Perhaps they should comply with the law, then.royalgrumpy wrote:By picking out two fans standing amongst a group of 40 in the front rows, and ignoring the several hundred stoop behind them?!
given the large number of people who were standing who were ignored by the stewards, and the fact that they had to wade in deep into the row to pick them out, I think it's most likely they the weren't thrown out for standing. Making gestures towards the away fans seems much more likely.royalgrumpy wrote:By picking out two fans standing amongst a group of 40 in the front rows, and ignoring the several hundred stoop behind them?!
Hey friend, how many times you been in the away end?loyalroyaldaz wrote:If its the law then why do they do oxf*rd all about the away fans standing!
It is NOT illegal to stand !!!
Wrong. I know the brother of one of them and he was thrown out for not sitting down quick enough, and given a warning. One of the other stewards disagreed with the way the steward handled it as well! The other lad was just for flatly refusing to sit when the other thousand or so around him were standing.tmesis wrote:given the large number of people who were standing who were ignored by the stewards, and the fact that they had to wade in deep into the row to pick them out, I think it's most likely they the weren't thrown out for standing. Making gestures towards the away fans seems much more likely.royalgrumpy wrote:By picking out two fans standing amongst a group of 40 in the front rows, and ignoring the several hundred stoop behind them?!
why on earth would they randomly pick on a bloke in a middle of a row when everyone else was standing?SPARTA wrote:Wrong. I know the brother of one of them and he was thrown out for not sitting down quick enough, and given a warning. One of the other stewards disagreed with the way the steward handled it as well! The other lad was just for flatly refusing to sit when the other thousand or so around him were standing.tmesis wrote:given the large number of people who were standing who were ignored by the stewards, and the fact that they had to wade in deep into the row to pick them out, I think it's most likely they the weren't thrown out for standing. Making gestures towards the away fans seems much more likely.royalgrumpy wrote:By picking out two fans standing amongst a group of 40 in the front rows, and ignoring the several hundred stoop behind them?!
I don't buy that for a second.Once were Biscuitmen wrote:As a politician you would never be blamed for maintaining a status quo which has overwhelming cross party support.urz13 wrote:What if a tragedy occurs from persistent standing in seated areas, though?
I guarantee the first time any reform is tried one of the Liverpool MPs will stand up, talk about children being crushed to death at Hillsborough, and whatever private members bill attempts this first will be toast.
Looked to me like one guy refused to sit down when he was isolated from the main stranding group. An arse of a steward decided to make an example out of him and then the rest had to back him even when the whole stand stood up in support.SPARTA wrote:Exactly, and that's why so many fans turned on the stewards, and the steward didn't try and get the whole block to sit. They focused on the front group to the left of the entrance/exit. Picking on someone for not sitting quickly enough, yet those around him remained on their feet, and the several hundred behind them in the top half of the stand remained on their feet, he was just looking for trouble. His colleague didn't agree with how he handled the situation either. The club will never win the battle, so they should just ask the stewards to make themselves visible, ask you to sit, then go off again and try again later. Throwing one or two fans out a week whilst ignoring the rest will never work. If you're going to put your foot down, then do it properly or not at all. The club will only alienate fans and ultimately lose them!
If the other thousand or so were in front of him obstructing his view he might have a point.SPARTA wrote:Wrong. I know the brother of one of them and he was thrown out for not sitting down quick enough, and given a warning. One of the other stewards disagreed with the way the steward handled it as well! The other lad was just for flatly refusing to sit when the other thousand or so around him were standing.tmesis wrote:given the large number of people who were standing who were ignored by the stewards, and the fact that they had to wade in deep into the row to pick them out, I think it's most likely they the weren't thrown out for standing. Making gestures towards the away fans seems much more likely.royalgrumpy wrote:By picking out two fans standing amongst a group of 40 in the front rows, and ignoring the several hundred stoop behind them?!
Not what I was told by one of the supervisors Saturday - they were thrown out for laying hands on a steward on the concourse.SPARTA wrote:Wrong. I know the brother of one of them and he was thrown out for not sitting down quick enough, and given a warning. One of the other stewards disagreed with the way the steward handled it as well! The other lad was just for flatly refusing to sit when the other thousand or so around him were standing.tmesis wrote:
given the large number of people who were standing who were ignored by the stewards, and the fact that they had to wade in deep into the row to pick them out, I think it's most likely they the weren't thrown out for standing. Making gestures towards the away fans seems much more likely.
I was right behind them. It started and finished in the stands. Whether or not they reacted as they were being lead out is another matter.westendgirl wrote:Not what I was told by one of the supervisors Saturday - they were thrown out for laying hands on a steward on the concourse.SPARTA wrote:Wrong. I know the brother of one of them and he was thrown out for not sitting down quick enough, and given a warning. One of the other stewards disagreed with the way the steward handled it as well! The other lad was just for flatly refusing to sit when the other thousand or so around him were standing.tmesis wrote:
given the large number of people who were standing who were ignored by the stewards, and the fact that they had to wade in deep into the row to pick them out, I think it's most likely they the weren't thrown out for standing. Making gestures towards the away fans seems much more likely.
Weren't they all told to sit at the front of Y25 again?SPARTA wrote:The stewards didn't say boo to a goose yesterday. Same fans and same amount standing, and same steward, but a completely different approach. Much better when some common sense is thrown in. Thank you RFC.
I didn't see them approach the fans but if they did they decided to just leave it, as no one sat back down. In fact more fans than normal stood for this game.bobby1413 wrote:Weren't they all told to sit at the front of Y25 again?SPARTA wrote:The stewards didn't say boo to a goose yesterday. Same fans and same amount standing, and same steward, but a completely different approach. Much better when some common sense is thrown in. Thank you RFC.
I don't recall as much of a presence by them. The game against Blackburn they seemed to me trying to make a point
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests