This 100. Backs ruin what could have been great kits.Platypuss wrote:Home:
Front: 9/10 (lose point for collar)
Back: 1/10. Grim.
Away:
Front: 9/10. Inventive while still keeping hoops. Like it a lot.
Back: 2/10. What a waste.
No.Scutterbucketz wrote:Will the kids kit have the sponsor on?
Equally I look forward to the only thing more predictable than people complaining about the kit - people complaining about people complaining about the kitStranded wrote:So there we go, we have some kits and the home one is blue and white.
I look forward to everyone complaining again next summer when the kit is released at exactly the same time as it is every year and it will be blue and white again but not quite blue and white enough and maybe with a funny sleeve.
Yep both are equally tiresome so will leave this conversation well alone from now on.dizzynewheights wrote:Equally I look forward to the only thing more predictable than people complaining about the kit - people complaining about people complaining about the kitStranded wrote:So there we go, we have some kits and the home one is blue and white.
I look forward to everyone complaining again next summer when the kit is released at exactly the same time as it is every year and it will be blue and white again but not quite blue and white enough and maybe with a funny sleeve.
'Keeper and away have solid backs, the same colour as the main colour of the kit.The Royal Forester wrote:I will reserve judgement until I have seen the backs. How can I see the back of the shirts? Please don't say Twitter, as I am not a Twiterer! Is there somebody who can upload pictures of the sides and backs (goalies as well if possable, please?
The Royal Forester wrote:I will reserve judgement until I have seen the backs. How can I see the back of the shirts? Please don't say Twitter, as I am not a Twiterer! Is there somebody who can upload pictures of the sides and backs (goalies as well if possable, please?




Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 29 guests