Between £5m and £6mUps and Downs wrote:If long does come back, how much is he gonna cost?
Quite right.Ups and Downs wrote:Both have black hair and play up front.
Both are terriers, chasing down balls others wouldn't even bother moving for. I'm sure there are other things.
ALF is deceptively fast but Long is far quicker. Long, despite not being particularly big, is extremely strong and very good at roughing up defenders. So I would love to see him back and, from what McDermott said after he left, I think Long would be more than happy to come back.Ups and Downs wrote:Both have black hair and play up front.
Both are terriers, chasing down balls others wouldn't even bother moving for. I'm sure there are other things.
That's the price you have to pay when you've pawned the family silver.paultheroyal wrote:£13 million to get to ex players back?
This. Cannot see how re-signing a player whose main contribution to a game is his diving.RoyalX wrote:I wouldn't be disappointed if we signed Long, just a bit underwhelmed.
It's a bit strange to have all this investment to get back where we were a season or two ago
It's because he's not Gylfi.Royal Ginger wrote:I don't know why everyone would be so upset if Long did come back. We were nearly all gutted when he went, he was great for us. I for one would love to see him partner with Roberts.
He hasn't scored a crazy number of goals this year, but when he's had the ball things happen. I'd welcome him back with open arms.
semtex1871 wrote:This. Cannot see how re-signing a player whose main contribution to a game is his diving.RoyalX wrote:I wouldn't be disappointed if we signed Long, just a bit underwhelmed.
It's a bit strange to have all this investment to get back where we were a season or two ago
It really can't be a coincidence that we started playing so well after we offloaded him and brought in roberts and Alfie.......not a forward move to re-sign old players.......
Semtex drops a bombshell.semtex1871 wrote: It really can't be a coincidence that we started playing so well after we offloaded him and brought in roberts and Alfie.............
This should keep us going for another few pagessemtex1871 wrote:This. Cannot see how re-signing a player whose main contribution to a game is his diving.RoyalX wrote:I wouldn't be disappointed if we signed Long, just a bit underwhelmed.
It's a bit strange to have all this investment to get back where we were a season or two ago
It really can't be a coincidence that we started playing so well after we offloaded him and brought in roberts and Alfie.......not a forward move to re-sign old players.......
You drunk?semtex1871 wrote:This. Cannot see how re-signing a player whose main contribution to a game is his diving.RoyalX wrote:I wouldn't be disappointed if we signed Long, just a bit underwhelmed.
It's a bit strange to have all this investment to get back where we were a season or two ago
It really can't be a coincidence that we started playing so well after we offloaded him and brought in roberts and Alfie.......not a forward move to re-sign old players.......
You have a very strange memory of last season and Shane Long. Folks, I think we found our fool of the day...semtex1871 wrote:This. Cannot see how re-signing a player whose main contribution to a game is his diving.RoyalX wrote:I wouldn't be disappointed if we signed Long, just a bit underwhelmed.
It's a bit strange to have all this investment to get back where we were a season or two ago
It really can't be a coincidence that we started playing so well after we offloaded him and brought in roberts and Alfie.......not a forward move to re-sign old players.......
Words fail meRockheadRumple wrote:Are you serious? I'd rather have Long back than bloody Gylfi!Pepe the Horseman wrote:If all this hysteria, is about Shane Long coming back, I'm gonna be fucking livid
What does that even mean?Pepe the Horseman wrote:Words fail meRockheadRumple wrote:Are you serious? I'd rather have Long back than bloody Gylfi!Pepe the Horseman wrote:If all this hysteria, is about Shane Long coming back, I'm gonna be fucking livid
This thread and and the talk of the takeover, possible signings and pizza is starting to take its toll on some posters as they fail to remember how well we were playing before the start of this season.semtex1871 wrote:This. Cannot see how re-signing a player whose main contribution to a game is his diving.RoyalX wrote:I wouldn't be disappointed if we signed Long, just a bit underwhelmed.
It's a bit strange to have all this investment to get back where we were a season or two ago
It really can't be a coincidence that we started playing so well after we offloaded him and brought in roberts and Alfie.......not a forward move to re-sign old players.......
winchester_royal wrote:What does that even mean?Pepe the Horseman wrote:Words fail meRockheadRumple wrote:
Are you serious? I'd rather have Long back than bloody Gylfi!
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot], Marcel and 52 guests