I think you are right. The idea that paperless tickets will solve the time taken to clear the area is absolute nonsense if the buses are travelling any significant distance (unless they plan to have 100s of buses waiting for passengers, which I very much doubt).Hound wrote:Regarding the free travel, the idea in principle is good enough, but driving into the town centre on a Saturday to find a car park is a complete pain in the backside at the best of times, esp if a load of footy fans start to use the car parks as well. I'm guessing there is nothing in the plans to build a new town centre car park
I think they need to do something airport style, where you park in a big field somewhere nearby away from the centre and there is a regular shuttle going back and forth
The 23-30 days relate to the well being of what is (used to be?) the core business/purpose of the club. Get it wrong and potentially wave goodbye to that business. I'm afraid I would be selfish if that happened and not be able to find much consolation in the fact that homes, jobs and all year round amenities have replaced the club.Elm Park Kid wrote:Happy to hear that this is going forward. I mean we need to keep in perspective that the parking/travel situation only concerns 23-30 days a year. It would be crazy to put that before a massive new investment project that will give people homes, jobs and amenities all year round.
.
It is cheap and easy, plus you can get pissed.Nameless wrote:T I currently drive but the bus actually stops at the end of my road, I may decide to switch if it is cheap, and easy.
Currently It's more expensive than driving, and not as easy. Plus I have rather more taste than drinking enough stadium beer to get drunk.72 bus wrote:It is cheap and easy, plus you can get pissed.Nameless wrote:T I currently drive but the bus actually stops at the end of my road, I may decide to switch if it is cheap, and easy.
You can get drunk on beer served in football stadiaNameless wrote:Currently It's more expensive than driving, and not as easy. Plus I have rather more taste than drinking enough stadium beer to get drunk.72 bus wrote:It is cheap and easy, plus you can get pissed.Nameless wrote:T I currently drive but the bus actually stops at the end of my road, I may decide to switch if it is cheap, and easy.
This x1000Sutekh wrote:I like the bit that says "....flexible space for live events and concerts..." hope that space will be flexible enough to allow for a concert hall that would allow Reading to be included on many a band's concert tours and not just a 500/1000 seat maximum offered by the Hexagon.
If you are taking a car load with you then yes driving is cheaper, but easier, really ? do you honestly find driving easier than just walking to the end of your road and getting on the bus.Nameless wrote:Currently It's more expensive than driving, and not as easy. Plus I have rather more taste than drinking enough stadium beer to get drunk.72 bus wrote:It is cheap and easy, plus you can get pissed.Nameless wrote:T I currently drive but the bus actually stops at the end of my road, I may decide to switch if it is cheap, and easy.
I don't park in the stadium car park and don't pay for parking. I don't queue to get in my car or wait for anyone else to fill up the other seats. My neighbours get the bus, I often see them waiting at the bus stop and I'm always home before them.72 bus wrote:If you are taking a car load with you then yes driving is cheaper, but easier, really ? do you honestly find driving easier than just walking to the end of your road and getting on the bus.Nameless wrote:Currently It's more expensive than driving, and not as easy. Plus I have rather more taste than drinking enough stadium beer to get drunk.72 bus wrote:
It is cheap and easy, plus you can get pissed.
For me :
Parking = £8
Bus=£5 return and I am home quicker on the bus.
There are still 800 spaces in the multi-storey.KC Royal wrote:I take it that the proposed multi-storey is no longer going ahead?
I've rarely parked in the stadium car park but as someone who drives to home games (though I've not been to any game this season) I am worried about how the loss of spaces will impact on parking in the area.
You cannot stop someone objecting. The previous expansion was partly halted by spurious objections from a neighbouring council.me wrote:The one thing that really concerns me is stadium expansion. If the need arises to increase capacity by 10-15,000, what is the likelihood that one nimby objects and blocks expansion. Surely there would have to be something in the sales contract giving the club the right to expand the stadium?
back in 13 SJM said something strange back then as he suggested that the original PM would lapse so they needed to resubmit.Nameless wrote:You cannot stop someone objecting. The previous expansion was partly halted by spurious objections from a neighbouring council.me wrote:The one thing that really concerns me is stadium expansion. If the need arises to increase capacity by 10-15,000, what is the likelihood that one nimby objects and blocks expansion. Surely there would have to be something in the sales contract giving the club the right to expand the stadium?
The objection would need to be upheld though and it's hard to see how someone renting a flat on a sports complex could raise a sustainable objection.
would you have thought they would have taken due diligence on what constitutes 'a start'?Nameless wrote:PP definitely have a limited life, I doubt if a random bit of concrete would extend that indefinitely. Maybe if you genuinely carried on shortly after the expiry you might be ok but not if you left it years !
At the early stages of a project it is often a matter of planning judgement as to whether or not development has started.
However, the following are useful examples of when the Department would accept that development has commenced in accordance with the approval.
Where an applicant has complied with conditions relating to works to be carried out before the commencement of other work e.g the construction of an access in accordance with the approved plans, and
Where an applicant has commenced any work of construction in the course of the erection of a building, such as the digging of foundations and preferably pouring of concrete, driving of piles or other substantive works;
The laying of any underground main pipe to the foundations or part of the foundations of a building;
How wonderful, but utterly meaningless !multisync1830 wrote:would you have thought they would have taken due diligence on what constitutes 'a start'?Nameless wrote:PP definitely have a limited life, I doubt if a random bit of concrete would extend that indefinitely. Maybe if you genuinely carried on shortly after the expiry you might be ok but not if you left it years !
At the early stages of a project it is often a matter of planning judgement as to whether or not development has started.
However, the following are useful examples of when the Department would accept that development has commenced in accordance with the approval.
Where an applicant has complied with conditions relating to works to be carried out before the commencement of other work e.g the construction of an access in accordance with the approved plans, and
Where an applicant has commenced any work of construction in the course of the erection of a building, such as the digging of foundations and preferably pouring of concrete, driving of piles or other substantive works;
The laying of any underground main pipe to the foundations or part of the foundations of a building;
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests