Aren't they in the same division as Reading now?Brogue wrote:forest v everton game should be called the deduction derby
by Winston Biscuit » 14 Jan 2024 22:29
14 Jan 2024 22:29Athletic reporter saying they will be charged.Sanguine wrote:Everton points deduction. Forest and Everton (again) apparently set to find out if they face FFP charges on Monday
I hate this false comparison. Everton and Forest will be charged with very simple breaches of the FFP rules i.e. they lost too much money over the 3 year period.Sanguine wrote:Everton points deduction. Forest and Everton (again) apparently set to find out if they face FFP charges on Monday. Last time Everton were charged it was resolved in a couple of months, wasn't it? Meanwhile City's date with destiny is some time next century. It all stinks.
Personally I think it's a little naive to think that there won't be more 'two-way discussion' between club and PL when it comes to any sanctions City face.Stranded wrote:I hate this false comparison. Everton and Forest will be charged with very simple breaches of the FFP rules i.e. they lost too much money over the 3 year period.Sanguine wrote:Everton points deduction. Forest and Everton (again) apparently set to find out if they face FFP charges on Monday. Last time Everton were charged it was resolved in a couple of months, wasn't it? Meanwhile City's date with destiny is some time next century. It all stinks.
City have been charged with multiple cases of what is alleged to be close to fraud - of course that will take a vastly longer period of time as I imagine forensic accountants need to review the books in great detail.
It may well all come to nothing, or be brushed under the carpet of course, but to compare the situations does nobody any favours.
As there will be with any club. Doesn't change the fact these are very different situations.Sanguine wrote:Personally I think it's a little naive to think that there won't be more 'two-way discussion' between club and PL when it comes to any sanctions City face.Stranded wrote:I hate this false comparison. Everton and Forest will be charged with very simple breaches of the FFP rules i.e. they lost too much money over the 3 year period.Sanguine wrote:Everton points deduction. Forest and Everton (again) apparently set to find out if they face FFP charges on Monday. Last time Everton were charged it was resolved in a couple of months, wasn't it? Meanwhile City's date with destiny is some time next century. It all stinks.
City have been charged with multiple cases of what is alleged to be close to fraud - of course that will take a vastly longer period of time as I imagine forensic accountants need to review the books in great detail.
It may well all come to nothing, or be brushed under the carpet of course, but to compare the situations does nobody any favours.
by WestYorksRoyal » 15 Jan 2024 16:15
15 Jan 2024 16:15by Winston Biscuit » 15 Jan 2024 16:59
15 Jan 2024 16:59Don't think so, they're two different jurisdictions. Bournemouth got fined by the EFL for breaking the rules when they went up, so I don't see how that can have counted against them in the PL.6ft Kerplunk wrote:How does it work for promoted clubs like Forrest? Are the EFL and Premier League rules the same so they can use 3 years of accounts.
But it should be taken into consideration out of respect to the FL.Dirk Gently wrote:Don't think so, they're two different jurisdictions. Bournemouth got fined by the EFL for breaking the rules when they went up, so I don't see how that can have counted against them in the PL.6ft Kerplunk wrote:How does it work for promoted clubs like Forrest? Are the EFL and Premier League rules the same so they can use 3 years of accounts.
https://talksport.com/football/395272/a ... fair-play/
The Pl have no respect for the FL.Sutekh wrote:But it should be taken into consideration out of respect to the FL.Dirk Gently wrote:Don't think so, they're two different jurisdictions. Bournemouth got fined by the EFL for breaking the rules when they went up, so I don't see how that can have counted against them in the PL.6ft Kerplunk wrote:How does it work for promoted clubs like Forrest? Are the EFL and Premier League rules the same so they can use 3 years of accounts.
https://talksport.com/football/395272/a ... fair-play/
Well I don’t care how good De Marco is, if that’s the best they can come up with, I think he might have a bit of a struggle on his hands.Forest have employed leading sports lawyer Nick de Marco to argue their case, which is thought to centre around the sale of Brennan Johnson to Tottenham for up to £45m in September.
This took place after the accounting deadline, but Forest argue their negotiating tactics allowed them to generate a higher fee than if they had been forced to sell by 30 June 2023.
Yes, they do combine the limits - therefore for Forest it’s 2 years at £13m under FL rules and 1 year at £35m, so, back in the PL, a total limit for permissible losses of £61m for the 3 years to 2022/23.Dirk Gently wrote:Don't think so, they're two different jurisdictions. Bournemouth got fined by the EFL for breaking the rules when they went up, so I don't see how that can have counted against them in the PL.6ft Kerplunk wrote:How does it work for promoted clubs like Forrest? Are the EFL and Premier League rules the same so they can use 3 years of accounts.
https://talksport.com/football/395272/a ... fair-play/
by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Jan 2024 12:32
16 Jan 2024 12:32
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests