by WestYorksRoyal » 17 Jan 2024 13:18
17 Jan 2024 13:18by YorkshireRoyal99 » 19 Jan 2024 09:25
19 Jan 2024 09:25I think they posted losses of around £17m a season or two ago however, I suspect they may be sailing fairly close to the wind. But yes, they aren't exactly a club I've viewed as being big spenders though either.WestYorksRoyal wrote:PNE, often held up as a model Championship club these days, released their accounts today. £12m net loss and £11m equity contributed by the owner. Perfectly safe for FFP given many costs are excluded and all fine so long as the owner is committed, but still dependent upon the owner who's put in close to £80m since taking over. And they are viewed as a well run club.
A sustainable Championship is a relegated Championship club, except when there are crisis clubs to finish above.
by Winston Biscuit » 19 Jan 2024 09:35
19 Jan 2024 09:35by WestYorksRoyal » 19 Jan 2024 09:46
19 Jan 2024 09:46Think it was more down to the self-publicist, who signed off on the deal between IT lessonsOrion1871 wrote:I wonder how the 'ammers got such a favourable deal.

We often hear the EFL Championship is a financial black hole - but how bad really is it?
In an attempt to visualise the problem, here's a grid showing pre-tax losses over the last decade
Key figs:
Collective net loss: £2.9 BILLION
Annual loss posted by 181/214 clubs
For now, your top (well, bottom) five:
Reading (£215.4m)
Fulham (£211.2m)
Nottingham Forest (£197.2m)
Middlesbrough (£165.3m)
Stoke City (£164.3m)
(Obviously this is only for seasons they were in Champ)
Stoke -88.3 (and that's with parachute payments at the time)Brogue wrote:We often hear the EFL Championship is a financial black hole - but how bad really is it?
In an attempt to visualise the problem, here's a grid showing pre-tax losses over the last decade
Key figs:
Collective net loss: £2.9 BILLION
Annual loss posted by 181/214 clubsFor now, your top (well, bottom) five:
Reading (£215.4m)
Fulham (£211.2m)
Nottingham Forest (£197.2m)
Middlesbrough (£165.3m)
Stoke City (£164.3m)
(Obviously this is only for seasons they were in Champ)
by Winston Biscuit » 04 Mar 2024 16:31
04 Mar 2024 16:31crikeySouthampton have filed their financial accounts for the year up to June 2023, recording a pre-tax loss of £70.5m. £93.5m loss after tax.
Approximately £14.6m costs were incurred in settlements to the former clubs of new coaches hired - Jones and co.
by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Mar 2024 19:58
06 Mar 2024 19:58
Given their outright refusal to co-operate with the EFL and them getting away with it via a loophole then I'll have very little sympathy if their promotion (and the vast amount of money they get) results with them having to sell a couple of players or take the penalty and see if they can still stay up.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Leicester could get a points deduction next season, due to PSR breach.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... deduction/
Seems like it could get messy.
by Winston Biscuit » 07 Mar 2024 08:47
07 Mar 2024 08:47Issue might be that the PL would probably fail to backup the FL making any punishment pretty laughable. Another mess that highlights the utter stupidity of two organisations running what amounts to the same competition.Stranded wrote:Given their outright refusal to co-operate with the EFL and them getting away with it via a loophole then I'll have very little sympathy if their promotion (and the vast amount of money they get) results with them having to sell a couple of players or take the penalty and see if they can still stay up.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Leicester could get a points deduction next season, due to PSR breach.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... deduction/
Seems like it could get messy.
In these instances, it hardly seems like a punishment but a business decision to carry the risk.
Yep, Leicester going in to admin, being able to keep all the players they couldn't afford and then get promoted was the case that brought point deductions in for all.Winston Biscuit wrote:iirc the idea of clubs being docked points for going into administration was only brought in because Leicester went into admin to help clear debts as they were on their way to promotion about 15-20 years ago. I remember there being a lot of unhappiness at the time of how they went about doing this.
I think it was slightly longer than that - iirc the debts were tied up with building the new stadium, and that opened in 2002.Stranded wrote:Yep, Leicester going in to admin, being able to keep all the players they couldn't afford and then get promoted was the case that brought point deductions in for all.Winston Biscuit wrote:iirc the idea of clubs being docked points for going into administration was only brought in because Leicester went into admin to help clear debts as they were on their way to promotion about 15-20 years ago. I remember there being a lot of unhappiness at the time of how they went about doing this.
Have to give their lawyers credit, they are pretty skilled at finding these loopholes - though, by all accounts today, unless they raise a decent wedge of sales before end of June, it will just delay and punishment as they are likely in breach of PL rules anyway.
I maintain the La Liga method of giving clubs spending limits at the start of the season is what's needed.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Leicester could get a points deduction next season, due to PSR breach.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... deduction/
Seems like it could get messy.
Still say Chelsea will be really happy that they're failing this season. Failing to qualify for European competition next season means they'll avoid UEFA's even more stringent PSR otherwise they could be looking at having to try and offload more than just what the PL want them to offload to stay "honest".Clyde1998 wrote:I maintain the La Liga method of giving clubs spending limits at the start of the season is what's needed.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Leicester could get a points deduction next season, due to PSR breach.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... deduction/
Seems like it could get messy.
From what I can work out their calculation is based on the following calculation:
Squad Cost Limit = Revenue - Non-Sporting Expenses - Debt Payments + 40% of Transfer Profit + Asset Sales (up to 5% of Revenue)
With squad cost being calculated as:
Squad Cost = Salaries + Image Rights + Agent Fees + Player Amortisation + Social Security + Compensation
The squad cost relates to the (up to) twenty-five players registered to play in league matches (not sure if there's a free pass for younger players), so any player who can't be registered cannot play in league matches - providing an instant sporting punishment for the clubs for overspending.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests