
Can't imagine it would, as it would be the same thing. IMO, the game is bigger than it would be because it's obvious the money goes to charities/community projects.Sanguine wrote:Borrowed off Twitter, but if we renamed the Charity Shield as the 'English Super Cup', would the game take on extra significance?
not forgetting that the FA were forced into changing its name from Charity Shield to Community Shield because a review by The Charity Commission found that the FA were failing to meet its legal obligations by refusing to say what money from ticket sales actually went to charityClyde1998 wrote:Can't imagine it would, as it would be the same thing. IMO, the game is bigger than it would be because it's obvious the money goes to charities/community projects.Sanguine wrote:Borrowed off Twitter, but if we renamed the Charity Shield as the 'English Super Cup', would the game take on extra significance?
by From Despair To Where? » 08 Jan 2025 20:57
08 Jan 2025 20:57It does seem very opaque where the money actually goes and how much goes where.Winston Biscuit wrote:not forgetting that the FA were forced into changing its name from Charity Shield to Community Shield because a review by The Charity Commission found that the FA were failing to meet its legal obligations by refusing to say what money from ticket sales actually went to charityClyde1998 wrote:Can't imagine it would, as it would be the same thing. IMO, the game is bigger than it would be because it's obvious the money goes to charities/community projects.Sanguine wrote:Borrowed off Twitter, but if we renamed the Charity Shield as the 'English Super Cup', would the game take on extra significance?
Official governing body of any description in "being opaque where its money goes (or comes from)" shockClyde1998 wrote:It does seem very opaque where the money actually goes and how much goes where.Winston Biscuit wrote:not forgetting that the FA were forced into changing its name from Charity Shield to Community Shield because a review by The Charity Commission found that the FA were failing to meet its legal obligations by refusing to say what money from ticket sales actually went to charityClyde1998 wrote: Can't imagine it would, as it would be the same thing. IMO, the game is bigger than it would be because it's obvious the money goes to charities/community projects.

"Anything but certain" surely?Sanguine wrote:Still just one league defeat for Leverkusen, means that Sir Harold Kane's first silverware remains all but certain.
In all competitions, Leverkusen have lost just 3 of their last 78 matches, dating back to the start of last season, and one of their last 49 league games.
Why don't all clubs have an official eagle handler?Winston Biscuit wrote:Italy is mental #4396
Lazio sack their official eagle handler for putting pictures of his penis operation online.
The club say they have cut all ties with him as they don't share his values.
When asked, the bloke himself said of the op ‘i have no regrets. I had the surgery to increase my sexual performance because I am very active. I need to ejaculate whenever I have free time'
They do, you just don't see them because most clubs don't have eagles.Sutekh wrote:Why don't all clubs have an official eagle handler?Winston Biscuit wrote:Italy is mental #4396
Lazio sack their official eagle handler for putting pictures of his penis operation online.
The club say they have cut all ties with him as they don't share his values.
When asked, the bloke himself said of the op ‘i have no regrets. I had the surgery to increase my sexual performance because I am very active. I need to ejaculate whenever I have free time'
So that’s where all the money went at Reading!Pepe the Horseman wrote:They do, you just don't see them because most clubs don't have eagles.Sutekh wrote:Why don't all clubs have an official eagle handler?Winston Biscuit wrote:Italy is mental #4396
Lazio sack their official eagle handler for putting pictures of his penis operation online.
The club say they have cut all ties with him as they don't share his values.
When asked, the bloke himself said of the op ‘i have no regrets. I had the surgery to increase my sexual performance because I am very active. I need to ejaculate whenever I have free time'
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests