by Brosef Stalin » 11 Aug 2015 16:07
by Mr Angry » 11 Aug 2015 16:17
sandman Jose Mourinho, what an arse.
Eva Carneiro, what an arse.
by WoodleyRoyal » 11 Aug 2015 16:27
Mr Angrysandman Jose Mourinho, what an arse.
Eva Carneiro, what an arse.
You see the real character of a person when they are under pressure; blaming your medical staff for running on to treat a potentially injured player is pretty indicative that Jose is basically a oxf*rd.
He is also ignorant; medical staff cannot come onto the field of play without permission from the ref. The ref either judged Hazard to be injured (and it would be SO unlike a Chelsea player to exaggerate an injury......), so called on the medical staff, or asked Hazard if he needed medical help to which he answered yes, so then the ref calls on the medical staff.
Jose is clearly under a lot of pressure at the moment and a poor start to the Champions League campaign will see him gone before Xmas.
Mr Angrysandman Jose Mourinho, what an arse.
Eva Carneiro, what an arse.
You see the real character of a person when they are under pressure; blaming your medical staff for running on to treat a potentially injured player is pretty indicative that Jose is basically a oxf*rd.
He is also ignorant; medical staff cannot come onto the field of play without permission from the ref. The ref either judged Hazard to be injured (and it would be SO unlike a Chelsea player to exaggerate an injury......), so called on the medical staff, or asked Hazard if he needed medical help to which he answered yes, so then the ref calls on the medical staff.
Jose is clearly under a lot of pressure at the moment and a poor start to the Champions League campaign will see him gone before Xmas.
by Pepe the Horseman » 11 Aug 2015 17:26
No Fixed Abode It was a foul however, Cahill was in a covering position so it shouldn't have been a red card. Simple.
Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line. If in doubt you don't give a penalty. Two mistakes by Michael Oliver on this occasion.
*On a related note - we were harshly given cards for diving last season. Good to see David Silva getting away with a blatant one last night.
by paultheroyal » 11 Aug 2015 18:42
by Nameless » 11 Aug 2015 22:11
No Fixed Abode It was a foul however, Cahill was in a covering position so it shouldn't have been a red card. Simple.
Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line. If in doubt you don't give a penalty. Two mistakes by Michael Oliver on this occasion.
*On a related note - we were harshly given cards for diving last season. Good to see David Silva getting away with a blatant one last night.
by paultheroyal » 11 Aug 2015 22:36
by Royal Rother » 11 Aug 2015 23:28
NamelessNo Fixed Abode It was a foul however, Cahill was in a covering position so it shouldn't have been a red card. Simple.
Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line. If in doubt you don't give a penalty. Two mistakes by Michael Oliver on this occasion.
*On a related note - we were harshly given cards for diving last season. Good to see David Silva getting away with a blatant one last night.
It was clearly inside the box. Just because it's close doesn't mean you bottle it.the ref would have had a call from the Lino to help on positioning.
One defender covering does not mean it isn't a red card. The offence is denying a clear goal scoring opportunity and whilst the ref takes into account positioning of covering players the fact that there is one around does not automatically mean the forward did not have an opportunity to score. In this case it would probably require the defender to be likely to be able to clear the ball before the forward could shoot.
by Sanguine » 12 Aug 2015 08:53
paultheroyal Going back on this medic issue, yet another reason to state what a tactless club Chelsea are.
If the players would not roll around on the floor then there would be no reason for a medic to come on the pitch.
Looks like Fearn could also be a goner.
by stealthpapes » 12 Aug 2015 08:55
NamelessNo Fixed Abode It was a foul however, Cahill was in a covering position so it shouldn't have been a red card. Simple.
Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line. If in doubt you don't give a penalty. Two mistakes by Michael Oliver on this occasion.
*On a related note - we were harshly given cards for diving last season. Good to see David Silva getting away with a blatant one last night.
It was clearly inside the box. Just because it's close doesn't mean you bottle it.the ref would have had a call from the Lino to help on positioning.
One defender covering does not mean it isn't a red card. The offence is denying a clear goal scoring opportunity and whilst the ref takes into account positioning of covering players the fact that there is one around does not automatically mean the forward did not have an opportunity to score. In this case it would probably require the defender to be likely to be able to clear the ball before the forward could shoot.
by Big Foot » 12 Aug 2015 09:32
paultheroyal Mourino has asked for the female doctor to be removed from the bench this weekend.
Club going for a hatrick...
Racist - tick
Sexist - tick
What's next?
by Nameless » 12 Aug 2015 10:25
NamelessNo Fixed Abode It was a foul however, Cahill was in a covering position so it shouldn't have been a red card. Simple.
Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line. If in doubt you don't give a penalty. Two mistakes by Michael Oliver on this occasion.
*On a related note - we were harshly given cards for diving last season. Good to see David Silva getting away with a blatant one last night.
It was clearly inside the box. Just because it's close doesn't mean you bottle it.the ref would have had a call from the Lino to help on positioning.
One defender covering does not mean it isn't a red card. The offence is denying a clear goal scoring opportunity and whilst the ref takes into account positioning of covering players the fact that there is one around does not automatically mean the forward did not have an opportunity to score. In this case it would probably require the defender to be likely to be able to clear the ball before the forward could shoot.
by Platypuss » 12 Aug 2015 11:08
No Fixed Abode Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line.
by stealthpapes » 12 Aug 2015 11:10
PlatypussNo Fixed Abode Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line.
So you admit yourself it was a penalty, then say it was questionable?
You OK, hun?
by Platypuss » 12 Aug 2015 11:38
No Fixed AbodePlatypussNo Fixed Abode Also questionable as to whether it was a penalty as it was right on the line.
So you admit yourself it was a penalty, then say it was questionable?
You OK, hun?
Are you ok as I never said it was a penalty.![]()
by leon » 12 Aug 2015 12:41
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk and 107 guests