You may be right with the first point although some of the comments from Sharp seem to suggest that is not the case. However, if it is, then why give us the mushroom treatment again? Is there really any harm in telling us the truth on this occasion? i.e. 'We have spoken to Southampton, however they (and maybe the player) appear to want to see whether there is interest from elsewhere before making any commitments' .Cypry wrote:It takes two to make a deal - perhaps Southampton want to wait and see if there's interest elsewhere - I can't believe that we haven't tried to do a deal, but they hold all the cards, and there's no urgency whatsoever in their part to do a deal....RoyalBlue wrote:Looks like we will probably miss out on him anyway as RFC seem to think that there is no rush to get on and do anything in this transfer window! Apparently they will get around to talking to Southampton 'in the next week or so' to find out what their thoughts on Sharp are. WTF?!! If Adkins wants Sharp, why the hell hadn't those talks taken place with Saints even before the window opened? No wonder we more often than not fail to sign our targets in transfer windows.
We now have a player (well we don't) wondering who wants him and where he needs to train to feel part of a team. If we do want Sharp, how the hell is that helping continuity? If we don't want him (and that doesn't appear to be what Adkins is indicating) why the hell don't we just say so in fairness to the player and to dampen fans' expections?
We could, I guess, try to force their hand by making a silly offer, but given his performances, I'm not sure that Sharp is worth it.....
If they came out and said the player wanted to wait and see what else is on the table, he'd get absolutely slated from some quarters along the lines of "well if he doesn't want to be here". They're a bit "damned if they do, damned if they don't"....RoyalBlue wrote:Cypry wrote:It takes two to make a deal - perhaps Southampton want to wait and see if there's interest elsewhere - I can't believe that we haven't tried to do a deal, but they hold all the cards, and there's no urgency whatsoever in their part to do a deal....RoyalBlue wrote:Looks like we will probably miss out on him anyway as RFC seem to think that there is no rush to get on and do anything in this transfer window! Apparently they will get around to talking to Southampton 'in the next week or so' to find out what their thoughts on Sharp are. WTF?!! If Adkins wants Sharp, why the hell hadn't those talks taken place with Saints even before the window opened? No wonder we more often than not fail to sign our targets in transfer windows.
We now have a player (well we don't) wondering who wants him and where he needs to train to feel part of a team. If we do want Sharp, how the hell is that helping continuity? If we don't want him (and that doesn't appear to be what Adkins is indicating) why the hell don't we just say so in fairness to the player and to dampen fans' expections?
We could, I guess, try to force their hand by making a silly offer, but given his performances, I'm not sure that Sharp is worth it.....
You may be right with the first point although some of the comments from Sharp seem to suggest that is not the case. However, if it is, then why give us the mushroom treatment again? Is there really any harm in telling us the truth on this occasion? i.e. 'We have spoken to Southampton, however they (and maybe the player) appear to want to see whether there is interest from elsewhere before making any commitments' .
Sometimes the 'PR spin' from RFC seems pretty clueless.
Like that Adam Le Fondre chap we signed from League 2 Rotherhampaddy20 wrote:Cant get excited about Sharp, not exactly shone since he has been here. Rather an up and coming striker from the nether regions.
I agree. If we seriously want to be in the PL why would we want a player that the current manager dropped as soon as he got Southampton promoted. Good Championship player but not PL standard. Therefore why waste the money on him unless we just want to stay in this division. I would rather we brought in a younger player with potential.soggy biscuit wrote:Can't help but feel we would be setting our sights very low if we sign Sharpe. Bit of a statement of non intent really if that is the quality the club are aiming at.
Agree with you there, Sogs. Whilst Sharp is a good finisher, I don't see what new added dimension he gives us over ALF.soggy biscuit wrote:Personally I would prefer us spend money on a young player with potential that the club feel they can develop to be someone good rather than a bloke in his late 30's that hasn't played well for a couple of years, been hit and miss his whole career and just finished a very underwhelming loan spell here.
Possibly if they said that and if it was true (I'm not sure it is Sharp that is hanging out for another club though - he seems to want things sorted). However, they could say that 'we have spoken to Southampton but at the moment they are waiting to see if their is interest elsewhere.' However, to say that 'we will speak to Southampton in the next week or so to see what their thoughts are ' (when we get around to it!) seems a daft thing to do and say.Cypry wrote:If they came out and said the player wanted to wait and see what else is on the table, he'd get absolutely slated from some quarters along the lines of "well if he doesn't want to be here". They're a bit "damned if they do, damned if they don't"....RoyalBlue wrote:Cypry wrote:
It takes two to make a deal - perhaps Southampton want to wait and see if there's interest elsewhere - I can't believe that we haven't tried to do a deal, but they hold all the cards, and there's no urgency whatsoever in their part to do a deal....
We could, I guess, try to force their hand by making a silly offer, but given his performances, I'm not sure that Sharp is worth it.....
You may be right with the first point although some of the comments from Sharp seem to suggest that is not the case. However, if it is, then why give us the mushroom treatment again? Is there really any harm in telling us the truth on this occasion? i.e. 'We have spoken to Southampton, however they (and maybe the player) appear to want to see whether there is interest from elsewhere before making any commitments' .
Sometimes the 'PR spin' from RFC seems pretty clueless.
Didn't you say we had agreed a deal with Southampton? Frustratingly that must mean there is next to nothing in the pot, contrary to more nonsense from SJM about him ensuring there would be at the very least some money!maffff wrote:Better than a night in with Nick, couple of bottles of Muscadet and a few poppers...
Yet still people eat the sh*t Madejski spouts/spouted in his radio interview following the Wigan game.SPARTA wrote:Didn't you say we had agreed a deal with Southampton? Frustratingly that must mean there is next to nothing in the pot, contrary to more nonsense from SJM about him ensuring there would be at the very least some money!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 29 guests