+1 Every right to go down? oxf*rd off, if you're not impeded you should get nothing.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Analysis of the Benteke pen on R5L has been getting me riled
Exactly at what point did commentators/press beside the change the rules on penalties? And why have the FA/refs not come out and clarified
Not seen the pen mind. But the comments were along the lines of "well there was the faintest of touches, but not enough to warrant that kind of dive. So the pen was really harsh, but on our slomo reply we can see that he has touched him in the box..... so its definitely a pen" Grrrrrrrrrrree
Just bloody where does it say you're not allowed contact with someone in the box FFS? You not allowed to foul them
I really wish the FA would tell everyone to shut up about it, and that contact has to be worthy of a proper foul. It would really protect the refs aswell
I remember hearing Bale comment in a Sky interview when he'd been booked for diving that he "felt contact so had every right to go down"...... and no pfucker challenged that viewpoint![]()
//Rant over
I remember Patrick Vieira talking about a penalty he won in a Champions League tie where he said he "thought" he felt contact so had every right to go down and no-one said "Hang on a minute , Patrick......"Ian Royal wrote:+1 Every right to go down? oxf*rd off, if you're not impeded you should get nothing.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Analysis of the Benteke pen on R5L has been getting me riled
Exactly at what point did commentators/press beside the change the rules on penalties? And why have the FA/refs not come out and clarified
Not seen the pen mind. But the comments were along the lines of "well there was the faintest of touches, but not enough to warrant that kind of dive. So the pen was really harsh, but on our slomo reply we can see that he has touched him in the box..... so its definitely a pen" Grrrrrrrrrrree
Just bloody where does it say you're not allowed contact with someone in the box FFS? You not allowed to foul them
I really wish the FA would tell everyone to shut up about it, and that contact has to be worthy of a proper foul. It would really protect the refs aswell
I remember hearing Bale comment in a Sky interview when he'd been booked for diving that he "felt contact so had every right to go down"...... and no pfucker challenged that viewpoint![]()
//Rant over
However, the refs are part of the problem, because they only blow up if you do go down, whether you're impeded or not. They actively teaching players to dive because of it.
Agreed, particularly if it's now also agreed and discussed on this very board that you jump a failed tackle that's also a penalty then what's the bloody issue!!Silver Fox wrote:It was a penalty though, if people think otherwise I'd love to know why?
Because it's Liverpool who are a bunch of fcuking underachieving nancy boys pricks.Silver Fox wrote:It was a penalty though, if people think otherwise I'd love to know why?
But what contact doesn't lead to a pen and what does?John Madejski's Wallet wrote:So are we really in a place where ANY touch on a player is a pen?
I guess games are going to finish with scores like 47-46 then
leon wrote:Because it's Liverpool who are a bunch of fcuking underachieving nancy boys pricks.Silver Fox wrote:It was a penalty though, if people think otherwise I'd love to know why?
Not convinced it was a penalty, despite what everyone says. Still, hoping they're very depressed for next Friday.
Yeah there was the slightest of contacts but not convinced either. If you wanted to see a clear cut penalty over the weekend Muniesa's rugby tackle on Oscar - unbelievable that wasn't given.leon wrote:Because it's Liverpool who are a bunch of fcuking underachieving nancy boys pricks.Silver Fox wrote:It was a penalty though, if people think otherwise I'd love to know why?
Not convinced it was a penalty, despite what everyone says. Still, hoping they're very depressed for next Friday.
The Palace defender did pull out of the challenge by pulling his legs out of the way but his momentum made his knee slightly clip Benteke's foot. He went down very easily. It's just one of those where if it's against you, you'd feel aggrieved when you consider there are more blatant penalties every week for shirt pulling from corners etc.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:I haven't seen the Benteke incident.
Now that IS contact that should be awarded as a pen.No Fixed Abode wrote:The Palace defender did pull out of the challenge by pulling his legs out of the way but his momentum made his knee slightly clip Benteke's foot. He went down very easily. It's just one of those where if it's against you, you'd feel aggrieved when you consider there are more blatant penalties every week for shirt pulling from corners etc.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:I haven't seen the Benteke incident.
Yeah, that's what I saw as well.Winston Smith wrote:only seen one replay of the Benteke incident and it looked massively homo (slightest contact on one foot = both legs giving way in dramatic fashion)
how do you account for things like leverage, balance or having one of your bases removedJohn Madejski's Wallet wrote:Now that IS contact that should be awarded as a pen.No Fixed Abode wrote:The Palace defender did pull out of the challenge by pulling his legs out of the way but his momentum made his knee slightly clip Benteke's foot. He went down very easily. It's just one of those where if it's against you, you'd feel aggrieved when you consider there are more blatant penalties every week for shirt pulling from corners etc.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:I haven't seen the Benteke incident.
Not a f*cking slight graze of the skin on the way past
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 41 guests