by Royal Rother » 11 Sep 2016 16:49
11 Sep 2016 16:49
by Royal Rother » 11 Sep 2016 17:35
11 Sep 2016 17:35by No Fixed Abode » 11 Sep 2016 18:53
11 Sep 2016 18:53Correct.Fluff wrote:Not a Chelsea fan, but I think Swansea were a bit lucky to still have 11 men on the pitch.
by Jack Celliers » 11 Sep 2016 21:34
11 Sep 2016 21:34by No Fixed Abode » 13 Sep 2016 12:57
13 Sep 2016 12:57Stoke didn't win in their first few games last season either.genome wrote:Y'know I think I would probably prefer to support Sunderland, who flirt with relegation every year and survive at the last moment, than perennial mid-tablers like West Brom or Stoke. It's more exciting, victories although rarer are sweeter.
Though it appears Stoke are trying their best to get in on it this year.
by Winston Smith » 13 Sep 2016 13:08
13 Sep 2016 13:08I do genuinely think mid to lower half in the PL is about the worst place to be as a fan. At least in the lower leagues each season could be wildly different so hope isn't far away, you have a more realistic 6th place to go for and you have either 6 or 7 new teams coming into the division each season to freshen things upgenome wrote:Y'know I think I would probably prefer to support Sunderland, who flirt with relegation every year and survive at the last moment, than perennial mid-tablers like West Brom or Stoke. It's more exciting, victories although rarer are sweeter.
Though it appears Stoke are trying their best to get in on it this year.
What are you a Stoke fan?No Fixed Abode wrote:Stoke didn't win in their first few games last season either.genome wrote:Y'know I think I would probably prefer to support Sunderland, who flirt with relegation every year and survive at the last moment, than perennial mid-tablers like West Brom or Stoke. It's more exciting, victories although rarer are sweeter.
Though it appears Stoke are trying their best to get in on it this year.
by No Fixed Abode » 13 Sep 2016 18:29
13 Sep 2016 18:29No. Just pointing out they got off to a poor start last season too. Which you obviously didn't know.genome wrote:What are you a Stoke fan?No Fixed Abode wrote:Stoke didn't win in their first few games last season either.genome wrote:Y'know I think I would probably prefer to support Sunderland, who flirt with relegation every year and survive at the last moment, than perennial mid-tablers like West Brom or Stoke. It's more exciting, victories although rarer are sweeter.
Though it appears Stoke are trying their best to get in on it this year.
Obviously. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.No Fixed Abode wrote:No. Just pointing out they got off to a poor start last season too. Which you obviously didn't know.genome wrote:What are you a Stoke fan?No Fixed Abode wrote:
Stoke didn't win in their first few games last season either.

The view in the from the other side of the pitch shows, to me at least, that he is reasonably in control of the challenge and that he doesn't go in studs up either. It looks to me like he takes the ball with his instep having turned his foot at the last moment (see 22 secs onwards in the video).Brosef Stalin wrote:https://cdn-e2.streamable.com/video/mp4/ebfe.mp4
No way he's in control of that. Definite foul.
by Saaaaaaaammmmmm » 17 Sep 2016 15:59
17 Sep 2016 15:59
Don't know why but would be very happy with them getting relegated this year. Sure it won't happen but would be fun if it did.Saaaaaaaammmmmm wrote:West Ham in complete meltdown it appears
Going 3-0 down to West Brom at HT is even funnier than their European 'adventure,' blowing a 2-0 lead against Watford, and all of their stadium problems
by Winston Smith » 18 Sep 2016 15:53
18 Sep 2016 15:53Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests