"I don't see how Ranieri can keep his job"
He's ex-city! Very biased against United (this may redeem him for youBR2 wrote:I thought Niall Quinn was bordering on unlistenable last night-all he could offer was that Bournemouth were plucky and committed when they were being mullered.
They ran about quite a lot and offered very little.
BR0B0T wrote:He's ex-city! Very biased against United (this may redeem him for youBR2 wrote:I thought Niall Quinn was bordering on unlistenable last night-all he could offer was that Bournemouth were plucky and committed when they were being mullered.
They ran about quite a lot and offered very little.)
Wow, even famously pro-Liverpool Gary Neville?No Fixed Abode wrote:Has anyone watched 'Gary Neville - The pundit' on SS1 yet? Even he had a pop at Sky for having so many ex Liverpool players as pundits.
Peter Drury, is and has always been, the biggest cnut on the planet. Appalling man.genome wrote:It does annoy me how condescending commentators/co-commentators are towards the smaller teams. Heard it in the Burnley vs Chelsea match. They were praising them but it was all so patronising.
In a similar vein, one of my absolute worst commentators, Peter Drury, is like this. If one of the big teams is playing a smaller side, he commentates such an air of inevitability in the tone of his voice when they are attacking, as if it's a foregone conclusion they will score. It does my nut in. Jonathan Pearce does this as well.
That was a proper ding-dong. I agree with Savage on the subject in general though. Really don't like Sutton.glass half full wrote:Savage has just called sutton 'a clown'.
Neutral corners, please!
Is Drury the one who w@nks himself into a frenzy of over-excitement at the sight of a throw in?leon wrote:Peter Drury, is and has always been, the biggest cnut on the planet. Appalling man.genome wrote:It does annoy me how condescending commentators/co-commentators are towards the smaller teams. Heard it in the Burnley vs Chelsea match. They were praising them but it was all so patronising.
In a similar vein, one of my absolute worst commentators, Peter Drury, is like this. If one of the big teams is playing a smaller side, he commentates such an air of inevitability in the tone of his voice when they are attacking, as if it's a foregone conclusion they will score. It does my nut in. Jonathan Pearce does this as well.
yeah, that was a bit unedifying. Wasn't it that the ball hadn't crossed the line, then it clearly had, or the other way around? Christ.I used to like Jonathan Pearce until the last World Cup when he went on a 5 minute rant about how shit goal line technology was when it had just given 2 perfectly correct decisions in the space of 10 seconds and he was too self absorbed to keep up with what the fcuk was happening.
cheers.From Despair To Where? wrote:A shot hit the post but didn't cross the line and then the keeper made a hash of collecting the loose ball as it rolled along the line and fumbled it marginally over. The replay correctly showed that the initial effort did not cross the line and that the fumble did.
Pearce wasn't paying attention and was absolutely convinced that the technology had got it wrong and then changed its mind despite the 2 replays clearly being of two different incidents. He proceeded to rant about how it didn't work properly for an embarrassingly long time even as further replays clarified exactly what the goal line technology had said.
France v Honduras
Yeah, I remember feeling genuinely embarrassed for the moron.From Despair To Where? wrote:A shot hit the post but didn't cross the line and then the keeper made a hash of collecting the loose ball as it rolled along the line and fumbled it marginally over. The replay correctly showed that the initial effort did not cross the line and that the fumble did.
Pearce wasn't paying attention and was absolutely convinced that the technology had got it wrong and then changed its mind despite the 2 replays clearly being of two different incidents. He proceeded to rant about how it didn't work properly for an embarrassingly long time even as further replays clarified exactly what the goal line technology had said.
France v Honduras
Not sure this entirely makes sense.Ian Royal wrote:Wow, even famously pro-Liverpool Gary Neville?No Fixed Abode wrote:Has anyone watched 'Gary Neville - The pundit' on SS1 yet? Even he had a pop at Sky for having so many ex Liverpool players as pundits.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests